Personality heterogeneity in teams: Which Differences Make a Difference for Team Performance?

Susan Mohammed, Linda C. Angell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of personality heterogeneity on team performance. Relationships were tested from 267 business students in 59 teams working on process improvement projects sponsored by organizations. The impact of personality composition on two types of team tasks (oral vs. written) was examined. Relationships between predictors and criteria differed depending on the type of task performed. Specifically, higher variability on agreeableness and neuroticism resulted in lower oral presentation scores, whereas higher variability on extraversion resulted in higher oral presentation scores. Teams with higher mean cognitive ability scored better on written reports. The implications of these findings for the study of team performance are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)651-677
Number of pages27
JournalSmall Group Research
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2003

Fingerprint

Personality
Aptitude
Students
Extraversion (Psychology)
Neuroticism

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

@article{1f3c1aaa00bd4ad8961872512c06f3ff,
title = "Personality heterogeneity in teams: Which Differences Make a Difference for Team Performance?",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of personality heterogeneity on team performance. Relationships were tested from 267 business students in 59 teams working on process improvement projects sponsored by organizations. The impact of personality composition on two types of team tasks (oral vs. written) was examined. Relationships between predictors and criteria differed depending on the type of task performed. Specifically, higher variability on agreeableness and neuroticism resulted in lower oral presentation scores, whereas higher variability on extraversion resulted in higher oral presentation scores. Teams with higher mean cognitive ability scored better on written reports. The implications of these findings for the study of team performance are discussed.",
author = "Susan Mohammed and Angell, {Linda C.}",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1046496403257228",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "651--677",
journal = "Small Group Research",
issn = "1046-4964",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Personality heterogeneity in teams : Which Differences Make a Difference for Team Performance? / Mohammed, Susan; Angell, Linda C.

In: Small Group Research, Vol. 34, No. 6, 01.12.2003, p. 651-677.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Personality heterogeneity in teams

T2 - Which Differences Make a Difference for Team Performance?

AU - Mohammed, Susan

AU - Angell, Linda C.

PY - 2003/12/1

Y1 - 2003/12/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of personality heterogeneity on team performance. Relationships were tested from 267 business students in 59 teams working on process improvement projects sponsored by organizations. The impact of personality composition on two types of team tasks (oral vs. written) was examined. Relationships between predictors and criteria differed depending on the type of task performed. Specifically, higher variability on agreeableness and neuroticism resulted in lower oral presentation scores, whereas higher variability on extraversion resulted in higher oral presentation scores. Teams with higher mean cognitive ability scored better on written reports. The implications of these findings for the study of team performance are discussed.

AB - The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of personality heterogeneity on team performance. Relationships were tested from 267 business students in 59 teams working on process improvement projects sponsored by organizations. The impact of personality composition on two types of team tasks (oral vs. written) was examined. Relationships between predictors and criteria differed depending on the type of task performed. Specifically, higher variability on agreeableness and neuroticism resulted in lower oral presentation scores, whereas higher variability on extraversion resulted in higher oral presentation scores. Teams with higher mean cognitive ability scored better on written reports. The implications of these findings for the study of team performance are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242719692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242719692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1046496403257228

DO - 10.1177/1046496403257228

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0242719692

VL - 34

SP - 651

EP - 677

JO - Small Group Research

JF - Small Group Research

SN - 1046-4964

IS - 6

ER -