Persons iii: The multiple faces of a corporation's legal personality

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The debate over competing conceptions of juridical persons still shows life today in terms not much removed from those of a century ago. At the core of the juridical personality� debate are two views of the critical nature of economic organizations. For one, economic organizations are property in the hands of their owners. This property might be given special qualities by the state or through contract, but it remains property all the same. The role of law was to focus on the interests of the owners or those with an ownership interest or stake in the entity. For the other, the economic organization (like a pallid reflection of the political state that gave it existence) constituted an autonomous institutional actor separable from those with an interest in it. The role of law should focus here on the entitythat is, on the collective interests constituting the entity rather than on the aggregate individual interests of stakeholders, however defined. Recent scholarship has suggested the connection between the two camps and the critical role that economic culture plays in the social acceptance of institutional personality. The extent of the regulatory autonomy of enterprises will continue to be a significant issue. This is very different from the nineteenth or twentieth centuries. Today an economic enterprise can insulate its assets within itself, disperse its assets among enterpriseseach an independent juridical person. It can exist independent of its shareholders, own itself, can exist independent of the regulation of any singular political community, choose the set of regulations to which it wishes to subject clusters of assets, for short: regulate itself. For the economic enterprise able to disperse assets and operations worldwide and access capital markets around the globe, the essential role of law of the economic organization emphasizes the ability of the multinational economic enterprise to become an autonomous and self-regulating enterprise.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSigns in Law - A Source Book
Subtitle of host publicationThe Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages199-211
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9783319098371
ISBN (Print)9783319098364
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Personality
corporation
personality
Economics
human being
economics
assets
Law
regulation
organization
Organizations
Social Distance
Person
shareholder
capital market
Aptitude
Ownership
Contracts
nineteenth century
twentieth century

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Backer, L. C. (2015). Persons iii: The multiple faces of a corporation's legal personality. In Signs in Law - A Source Book: The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III (pp. 199-211). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_23
Backer, Larry Cata. / Persons iii : The multiple faces of a corporation's legal personality. Signs in Law - A Source Book: The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III. Springer International Publishing, 2015. pp. 199-211
@inbook{4d672479b42b4f619d5c08bcdb622938,
title = "Persons iii: The multiple faces of a corporation's legal personality",
abstract = "The debate over competing conceptions of juridical persons still shows life today in terms not much removed from those of a century ago. At the core of the juridical personality� debate are two views of the critical nature of economic organizations. For one, economic organizations are property in the hands of their owners. This property might be given special qualities by the state or through contract, but it remains property all the same. The role of law was to focus on the interests of the owners or those with an ownership interest or stake in the entity. For the other, the economic organization (like a pallid reflection of the political state that gave it existence) constituted an autonomous institutional actor separable from those with an interest in it. The role of law should focus here on the entitythat is, on the collective interests constituting the entity rather than on the aggregate individual interests of stakeholders, however defined. Recent scholarship has suggested the connection between the two camps and the critical role that economic culture plays in the social acceptance of institutional personality. The extent of the regulatory autonomy of enterprises will continue to be a significant issue. This is very different from the nineteenth or twentieth centuries. Today an economic enterprise can insulate its assets within itself, disperse its assets among enterpriseseach an independent juridical person. It can exist independent of its shareholders, own itself, can exist independent of the regulation of any singular political community, choose the set of regulations to which it wishes to subject clusters of assets, for short: regulate itself. For the economic enterprise able to disperse assets and operations worldwide and access capital markets around the globe, the essential role of law of the economic organization emphasizes the ability of the multinational economic enterprise to become an autonomous and self-regulating enterprise.",
author = "Backer, {Larry Cata}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_23",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783319098364",
pages = "199--211",
booktitle = "Signs in Law - A Source Book",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

Backer, LC 2015, Persons iii: The multiple faces of a corporation's legal personality. in Signs in Law - A Source Book: The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III. Springer International Publishing, pp. 199-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_23

Persons iii : The multiple faces of a corporation's legal personality. / Backer, Larry Cata.

Signs in Law - A Source Book: The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III. Springer International Publishing, 2015. p. 199-211.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Persons iii

T2 - The multiple faces of a corporation's legal personality

AU - Backer, Larry Cata

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The debate over competing conceptions of juridical persons still shows life today in terms not much removed from those of a century ago. At the core of the juridical personality� debate are two views of the critical nature of economic organizations. For one, economic organizations are property in the hands of their owners. This property might be given special qualities by the state or through contract, but it remains property all the same. The role of law was to focus on the interests of the owners or those with an ownership interest or stake in the entity. For the other, the economic organization (like a pallid reflection of the political state that gave it existence) constituted an autonomous institutional actor separable from those with an interest in it. The role of law should focus here on the entitythat is, on the collective interests constituting the entity rather than on the aggregate individual interests of stakeholders, however defined. Recent scholarship has suggested the connection between the two camps and the critical role that economic culture plays in the social acceptance of institutional personality. The extent of the regulatory autonomy of enterprises will continue to be a significant issue. This is very different from the nineteenth or twentieth centuries. Today an economic enterprise can insulate its assets within itself, disperse its assets among enterpriseseach an independent juridical person. It can exist independent of its shareholders, own itself, can exist independent of the regulation of any singular political community, choose the set of regulations to which it wishes to subject clusters of assets, for short: regulate itself. For the economic enterprise able to disperse assets and operations worldwide and access capital markets around the globe, the essential role of law of the economic organization emphasizes the ability of the multinational economic enterprise to become an autonomous and self-regulating enterprise.

AB - The debate over competing conceptions of juridical persons still shows life today in terms not much removed from those of a century ago. At the core of the juridical personality� debate are two views of the critical nature of economic organizations. For one, economic organizations are property in the hands of their owners. This property might be given special qualities by the state or through contract, but it remains property all the same. The role of law was to focus on the interests of the owners or those with an ownership interest or stake in the entity. For the other, the economic organization (like a pallid reflection of the political state that gave it existence) constituted an autonomous institutional actor separable from those with an interest in it. The role of law should focus here on the entitythat is, on the collective interests constituting the entity rather than on the aggregate individual interests of stakeholders, however defined. Recent scholarship has suggested the connection between the two camps and the critical role that economic culture plays in the social acceptance of institutional personality. The extent of the regulatory autonomy of enterprises will continue to be a significant issue. This is very different from the nineteenth or twentieth centuries. Today an economic enterprise can insulate its assets within itself, disperse its assets among enterpriseseach an independent juridical person. It can exist independent of its shareholders, own itself, can exist independent of the regulation of any singular political community, choose the set of regulations to which it wishes to subject clusters of assets, for short: regulate itself. For the economic enterprise able to disperse assets and operations worldwide and access capital markets around the globe, the essential role of law of the economic organization emphasizes the ability of the multinational economic enterprise to become an autonomous and self-regulating enterprise.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955400193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955400193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_23

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_23

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84955400193

SN - 9783319098364

SP - 199

EP - 211

BT - Signs in Law - A Source Book

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -

Backer LC. Persons iii: The multiple faces of a corporation's legal personality. In Signs in Law - A Source Book: The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III. Springer International Publishing. 2015. p. 199-211 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_23