Phosphorus indices: Why we need to take stock of how we are doing

Andrew Sharpley, Doug Beegle, Carl Bolster, Laura Good, Brad Joern, Quirine Ketterings, John Lory, Rob Mikkelsen, Deanna Osmond, Peter Vadas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Scopus citations

Abstract

Many states have invested significant resources to identify components of their Phosphorus (P) Index that reliably estimate the relative risk of P loss and incentivize conservation management. However, differences in management recommendations and manure application guidelines for similar field conditions among state P Indices, coupled with minimal reductions in the extent of P-impaired surface waters and soil test P (STP) levels, led the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS) to revise the 590 Nutrient Management Standard. In preparation for this revision, NRCS requested that a review of the scientific underpinnings and accuracy of current P Indices be undertaken. They also sought to standardize the interpretation and management implications of P Indices, including establishment of ratings above which P applications should be curtailed. Although some states have initiated STP thresholds above which no application of P is allowed, STP alone cannot define a site's risk of P loss. Phosphorus Indices are intended to accoun for all of the major factors leading to P loss. A rigorous evaluation of P Indices is neede to determine if they are directionally and magnitudinally correct. Although use of observed P loss data under various management scenarios is ideal, such data are spatially and temporally limited. Alternatively, the use of a locally validated water quality model that has been shown to provide accurate estimates of P loss may be the most expedient option to conduct Index assessments in the short time required by the newly revised 590 Standard.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1711-1719
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Environmental Quality
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Phosphorus indices: Why we need to take stock of how we are doing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Sharpley, A., Beegle, D., Bolster, C., Good, L., Joern, B., Ketterings, Q., Lory, J., Mikkelsen, R., Osmond, D., & Vadas, P. (2012). Phosphorus indices: Why we need to take stock of how we are doing. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41(6), 1711-1719. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2012.0040