Photo-stability and performance of CdSe/ZnS quantum dots in luminescent solar concentrators

Meredith G. Hyldahl, Sheldon T. Bailey, Bruce Paul Wittmershaus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The performances of luminescent solar concentrators (LSCs) made with two versions of quantum dots (QDs) with CdSe cores and ZnS shells are compared to LSCs containing the organic dye, Lumogen® F Red 300 (LR), to assess the viability of QD LSCs. In addition to spectroscopic and light collection measurements, the photo-degradation response of the version I (vI) QD LSC is compared to the LR LSC. The measured fluorescence quantum yield of the version II (vII) QDs (57%) is about half that of LR (>90%) and twice that of the vI QDs (31%). Though the quantum yield for vII QDs is lower than LR, the vII QD LSC has nearly twice the short-circuit current of the LR LSCs or the vI QD LSCs when their respective red-peak optical densities are the same in 6.2 × 6.2 × 0.6 cm LSCs. This is a reflection of the main advantage of QDs for use in LSCs, that QDs collect considerably more sunlight than LR due to their broad absorption spectrum. Despite the fact that the QD LSCs absorbs more photons than the LR LSCs, the slow phase of the photo-degradation rate of the QD LSC is approximately five times slower than the LR LSC under nearly constant light exposure. Most surprising is the observation that the photo-degradation of the QD LSC's absorption completely recovers during a prolonged dark cycle. In a normal day/night cycle, this will benefit the performance of the QD LSC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)566-573
Number of pages8
JournalSolar Energy
Volume83
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2009

Fingerprint

Solar concentrators
Semiconductor quantum dots
Photodegradation
Quantum yield
Density (optical)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Materials Science(all)

Cite this

Hyldahl, Meredith G. ; Bailey, Sheldon T. ; Wittmershaus, Bruce Paul. / Photo-stability and performance of CdSe/ZnS quantum dots in luminescent solar concentrators. In: Solar Energy. 2009 ; Vol. 83, No. 4. pp. 566-573.
@article{c444c7ca3e0e47958fb7335e418a68f0,
title = "Photo-stability and performance of CdSe/ZnS quantum dots in luminescent solar concentrators",
abstract = "The performances of luminescent solar concentrators (LSCs) made with two versions of quantum dots (QDs) with CdSe cores and ZnS shells are compared to LSCs containing the organic dye, Lumogen{\circledR} F Red 300 (LR), to assess the viability of QD LSCs. In addition to spectroscopic and light collection measurements, the photo-degradation response of the version I (vI) QD LSC is compared to the LR LSC. The measured fluorescence quantum yield of the version II (vII) QDs (57{\%}) is about half that of LR (>90{\%}) and twice that of the vI QDs (31{\%}). Though the quantum yield for vII QDs is lower than LR, the vII QD LSC has nearly twice the short-circuit current of the LR LSCs or the vI QD LSCs when their respective red-peak optical densities are the same in 6.2 × 6.2 × 0.6 cm LSCs. This is a reflection of the main advantage of QDs for use in LSCs, that QDs collect considerably more sunlight than LR due to their broad absorption spectrum. Despite the fact that the QD LSCs absorbs more photons than the LR LSCs, the slow phase of the photo-degradation rate of the QD LSC is approximately five times slower than the LR LSC under nearly constant light exposure. Most surprising is the observation that the photo-degradation of the QD LSC's absorption completely recovers during a prolonged dark cycle. In a normal day/night cycle, this will benefit the performance of the QD LSC.",
author = "Hyldahl, {Meredith G.} and Bailey, {Sheldon T.} and Wittmershaus, {Bruce Paul}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.solener.2008.10.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "566--573",
journal = "Solar Energy",
issn = "0038-092X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

Photo-stability and performance of CdSe/ZnS quantum dots in luminescent solar concentrators. / Hyldahl, Meredith G.; Bailey, Sheldon T.; Wittmershaus, Bruce Paul.

In: Solar Energy, Vol. 83, No. 4, 01.04.2009, p. 566-573.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Photo-stability and performance of CdSe/ZnS quantum dots in luminescent solar concentrators

AU - Hyldahl, Meredith G.

AU - Bailey, Sheldon T.

AU - Wittmershaus, Bruce Paul

PY - 2009/4/1

Y1 - 2009/4/1

N2 - The performances of luminescent solar concentrators (LSCs) made with two versions of quantum dots (QDs) with CdSe cores and ZnS shells are compared to LSCs containing the organic dye, Lumogen® F Red 300 (LR), to assess the viability of QD LSCs. In addition to spectroscopic and light collection measurements, the photo-degradation response of the version I (vI) QD LSC is compared to the LR LSC. The measured fluorescence quantum yield of the version II (vII) QDs (57%) is about half that of LR (>90%) and twice that of the vI QDs (31%). Though the quantum yield for vII QDs is lower than LR, the vII QD LSC has nearly twice the short-circuit current of the LR LSCs or the vI QD LSCs when their respective red-peak optical densities are the same in 6.2 × 6.2 × 0.6 cm LSCs. This is a reflection of the main advantage of QDs for use in LSCs, that QDs collect considerably more sunlight than LR due to their broad absorption spectrum. Despite the fact that the QD LSCs absorbs more photons than the LR LSCs, the slow phase of the photo-degradation rate of the QD LSC is approximately five times slower than the LR LSC under nearly constant light exposure. Most surprising is the observation that the photo-degradation of the QD LSC's absorption completely recovers during a prolonged dark cycle. In a normal day/night cycle, this will benefit the performance of the QD LSC.

AB - The performances of luminescent solar concentrators (LSCs) made with two versions of quantum dots (QDs) with CdSe cores and ZnS shells are compared to LSCs containing the organic dye, Lumogen® F Red 300 (LR), to assess the viability of QD LSCs. In addition to spectroscopic and light collection measurements, the photo-degradation response of the version I (vI) QD LSC is compared to the LR LSC. The measured fluorescence quantum yield of the version II (vII) QDs (57%) is about half that of LR (>90%) and twice that of the vI QDs (31%). Though the quantum yield for vII QDs is lower than LR, the vII QD LSC has nearly twice the short-circuit current of the LR LSCs or the vI QD LSCs when their respective red-peak optical densities are the same in 6.2 × 6.2 × 0.6 cm LSCs. This is a reflection of the main advantage of QDs for use in LSCs, that QDs collect considerably more sunlight than LR due to their broad absorption spectrum. Despite the fact that the QD LSCs absorbs more photons than the LR LSCs, the slow phase of the photo-degradation rate of the QD LSC is approximately five times slower than the LR LSC under nearly constant light exposure. Most surprising is the observation that the photo-degradation of the QD LSC's absorption completely recovers during a prolonged dark cycle. In a normal day/night cycle, this will benefit the performance of the QD LSC.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61849149430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61849149430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.solener.2008.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.solener.2008.10.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:61849149430

VL - 83

SP - 566

EP - 573

JO - Solar Energy

JF - Solar Energy

SN - 0038-092X

IS - 4

ER -