physicians' perceptions of consensus reports

Martha N. Hill, Carol S. Weisman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a pretest-posttest panel survey of 595 eligible Maryland physicians practicing family or general medicine, internal medicine, cardiology, or nephrology, perceptions of consensus reports designed to alter medical practice are examined. On a 7-point scale, physicians reported positive or neutral views of descriptors, most favorably rating credible (mean = 2.25) and reliable (mean = 2.41), and least favorably rating biased (mean = 3.79). In a regression analysis of factors influencing changes in practice behavior congruent with consensus recommendations before and 1 year after the release of a consensus report on hypertension (8), these perceptions were not significant determinants. The strongest predictor of congruent practice behavior a year after the report was published was congruent practice behavior just prior to the report's release, and the second strongest predictor was perceived influence of the report's sources/sponsors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)30-41
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1991

Fingerprint

Nephrology
Family Physicians
Internal Medicine
Cardiology
Regression Analysis
Medicine
Hypertension
Physicians
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{c698d0ec97214975b0e64e923c6d9981,
title = "physicians' perceptions of consensus reports",
abstract = "In a pretest-posttest panel survey of 595 eligible Maryland physicians practicing family or general medicine, internal medicine, cardiology, or nephrology, perceptions of consensus reports designed to alter medical practice are examined. On a 7-point scale, physicians reported positive or neutral views of descriptors, most favorably rating credible (mean = 2.25) and reliable (mean = 2.41), and least favorably rating biased (mean = 3.79). In a regression analysis of factors influencing changes in practice behavior congruent with consensus recommendations before and 1 year after the release of a consensus report on hypertension (8), these perceptions were not significant determinants. The strongest predictor of congruent practice behavior a year after the report was published was congruent practice behavior just prior to the report's release, and the second strongest predictor was perceived influence of the report's sources/sponsors.",
author = "Hill, {Martha N.} and Weisman, {Carol S.}",
year = "1991",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1017/S0266462300004827",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "30--41",
journal = "International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care",
issn = "0266-4623",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

physicians' perceptions of consensus reports. / Hill, Martha N.; Weisman, Carol S.

In: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Vol. 7, No. 1, 08.1991, p. 30-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - physicians' perceptions of consensus reports

AU - Hill, Martha N.

AU - Weisman, Carol S.

PY - 1991/8

Y1 - 1991/8

N2 - In a pretest-posttest panel survey of 595 eligible Maryland physicians practicing family or general medicine, internal medicine, cardiology, or nephrology, perceptions of consensus reports designed to alter medical practice are examined. On a 7-point scale, physicians reported positive or neutral views of descriptors, most favorably rating credible (mean = 2.25) and reliable (mean = 2.41), and least favorably rating biased (mean = 3.79). In a regression analysis of factors influencing changes in practice behavior congruent with consensus recommendations before and 1 year after the release of a consensus report on hypertension (8), these perceptions were not significant determinants. The strongest predictor of congruent practice behavior a year after the report was published was congruent practice behavior just prior to the report's release, and the second strongest predictor was perceived influence of the report's sources/sponsors.

AB - In a pretest-posttest panel survey of 595 eligible Maryland physicians practicing family or general medicine, internal medicine, cardiology, or nephrology, perceptions of consensus reports designed to alter medical practice are examined. On a 7-point scale, physicians reported positive or neutral views of descriptors, most favorably rating credible (mean = 2.25) and reliable (mean = 2.41), and least favorably rating biased (mean = 3.79). In a regression analysis of factors influencing changes in practice behavior congruent with consensus recommendations before and 1 year after the release of a consensus report on hypertension (8), these perceptions were not significant determinants. The strongest predictor of congruent practice behavior a year after the report was published was congruent practice behavior just prior to the report's release, and the second strongest predictor was perceived influence of the report's sources/sponsors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025922675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025922675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0266462300004827

DO - 10.1017/S0266462300004827

M3 - Article

C2 - 2032774

AN - SCOPUS:0025922675

VL - 7

SP - 30

EP - 41

JO - International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

JF - International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

SN - 0266-4623

IS - 1

ER -