Picking a frame for communicating about genetics

Stigmas or challenges

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Currently, one may describe awareness of genomics as limited, but growing in the US. Although awareness is limited, the US public expresses great concern that genomics could result in stigmatization and discrimination (Reproductive genetic testing: What America thinks. Washington, DC: Genetics and Public Policy Center, 2004). This situation provides a rare opportunity to think carefully about how to design communication to a general public in ways that galvanize positive sentiments around genomics instead of stimulate stigmas. This manuscript provides a synthesis of communication theories relevant to framing genomics in stigma and challenge formats, the details necessary to understand what such messages look like, and an illustration of the two frames. Many people in different roles are engaging in these conversations in many different contexts. Through the growing exposure and interest in genomics, the opportunity to proactively script messages to form beliefs and attitudes about genomics, instead of managing pre-existing ones, may disappear quickly.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)289-298
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Genetic Counseling
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2007

Fingerprint

Genomics
Communication
Stereotyping
Genetic Testing
Public Policy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

@article{0a188b996c56452cacd176b12d517661,
title = "Picking a frame for communicating about genetics: Stigmas or challenges",
abstract = "Currently, one may describe awareness of genomics as limited, but growing in the US. Although awareness is limited, the US public expresses great concern that genomics could result in stigmatization and discrimination (Reproductive genetic testing: What America thinks. Washington, DC: Genetics and Public Policy Center, 2004). This situation provides a rare opportunity to think carefully about how to design communication to a general public in ways that galvanize positive sentiments around genomics instead of stimulate stigmas. This manuscript provides a synthesis of communication theories relevant to framing genomics in stigma and challenge formats, the details necessary to understand what such messages look like, and an illustration of the two frames. Many people in different roles are engaging in these conversations in many different contexts. Through the growing exposure and interest in genomics, the opportunity to proactively script messages to form beliefs and attitudes about genomics, instead of managing pre-existing ones, may disappear quickly.",
author = "Smith, {Rachel Annette}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10897-006-9075-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "289--298",
journal = "Journal of Genetic Counseling",
issn = "1059-7700",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic/Human Sciences Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Picking a frame for communicating about genetics : Stigmas or challenges. / Smith, Rachel Annette.

In: Journal of Genetic Counseling, Vol. 16, No. 3, 01.06.2007, p. 289-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Picking a frame for communicating about genetics

T2 - Stigmas or challenges

AU - Smith, Rachel Annette

PY - 2007/6/1

Y1 - 2007/6/1

N2 - Currently, one may describe awareness of genomics as limited, but growing in the US. Although awareness is limited, the US public expresses great concern that genomics could result in stigmatization and discrimination (Reproductive genetic testing: What America thinks. Washington, DC: Genetics and Public Policy Center, 2004). This situation provides a rare opportunity to think carefully about how to design communication to a general public in ways that galvanize positive sentiments around genomics instead of stimulate stigmas. This manuscript provides a synthesis of communication theories relevant to framing genomics in stigma and challenge formats, the details necessary to understand what such messages look like, and an illustration of the two frames. Many people in different roles are engaging in these conversations in many different contexts. Through the growing exposure and interest in genomics, the opportunity to proactively script messages to form beliefs and attitudes about genomics, instead of managing pre-existing ones, may disappear quickly.

AB - Currently, one may describe awareness of genomics as limited, but growing in the US. Although awareness is limited, the US public expresses great concern that genomics could result in stigmatization and discrimination (Reproductive genetic testing: What America thinks. Washington, DC: Genetics and Public Policy Center, 2004). This situation provides a rare opportunity to think carefully about how to design communication to a general public in ways that galvanize positive sentiments around genomics instead of stimulate stigmas. This manuscript provides a synthesis of communication theories relevant to framing genomics in stigma and challenge formats, the details necessary to understand what such messages look like, and an illustration of the two frames. Many people in different roles are engaging in these conversations in many different contexts. Through the growing exposure and interest in genomics, the opportunity to proactively script messages to form beliefs and attitudes about genomics, instead of managing pre-existing ones, may disappear quickly.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249944400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249944400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10897-006-9075-y

DO - 10.1007/s10897-006-9075-y

M3 - Review article

VL - 16

SP - 289

EP - 298

JO - Journal of Genetic Counseling

JF - Journal of Genetic Counseling

SN - 1059-7700

IS - 3

ER -