Plump or corpulent? Lean or gaunt? Historical categories of bodily health in nineteenth-century thought

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although “excess” weight today is usually associated with poor health, nineteenthcentury classifications present an interesting historical puzzle: Physician concern with “corpulence,” on the one hand, was balanced by praise for “plumpness,” on the other. This is quite different from contemporary understandings of weight, where the focus is overwhelmingly on overweight and obesity. Through an analysis of nineteenth-century medical, health reform, and popular journals, I find that there was concern with weight on both ends of the spectrum—thin bodies and fat bodies were potential states of health, as well as illness, through the categories of plumpness, corpulence, leanness, and gauntness. In this way, body weight held multiple symbolic positions up until the early twentieth century when plumpness receded as a category of health. Such findings problematize the standard historical narrative of valued-to-stigmatized fatness, and suggest that the symbolic position held by body weight constitutes a more complicated phenomenon than previously believed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-303
Number of pages21
JournalSocial Science History
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Plump or corpulent? Lean or gaunt? Historical categories of bodily health in nineteenth-century thought'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this