Point-of-care estimated radiation exposure and imaging guidelines can reduce pediatric radiation burden

Christopher W. Bunt, Harry B. Burke, Alexander J. Towbin, Albert Hoang, Mark Stephens, Paul Fontelo, Fang Liu, Ronald W. Gimbel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The steady increase in the use of computed tomography (CT) has particular concerns for children. Family physicians must often select pediatric imaging without any decision support. We hypothesized that point-of-care decision support would lead to the selection of imaging that lowered radiation exposure and improved guideline congruence. Methods: Our double-blind, randomized simulation included family physicians in the Military Health System. Participants initially reviewed a pediatric hematuria scenario and selected imaging without decision support. Participants were subsequently randomized to either receive imaging-appropriateness guidelines and then estimated radiation exposure information or receive estimated radiation information then guidelines; imaging selections were required after each step. The primary outcome was the selected imaging modality with point-of-care decision support. Results: The first arm increased CT ordering after viewing the guidelines (P = .008) but then decreased it after reviewing radiation exposure information (P = .007). In the second arm radiation information decreased CT and plain film use (P = not significant), with a subsequent increase in ultrasound and CT after the guideline presentation (P = .05). Conclusions: Decision support during a simulated pediatric scenario helped family physicians select imaging that lowered radiation exposure and was aligned with current guidelines, especially when presented with radiation information after guideline review. This information could help inform electronic medical record design.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-350
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Point-of-Care Systems
Guidelines
Radiation
Pediatrics
Family Physicians
Tomography
Electronic Health Records
Hematuria
Motion Pictures
Radiation Exposure
Double-Blind Method
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Bunt, Christopher W. ; Burke, Harry B. ; Towbin, Alexander J. ; Hoang, Albert ; Stephens, Mark ; Fontelo, Paul ; Liu, Fang ; Gimbel, Ronald W. / Point-of-care estimated radiation exposure and imaging guidelines can reduce pediatric radiation burden. In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 28, No. 3. pp. 343-350.
@article{ec89cd8bb4c64fa4b45eb62cbd0498d9,
title = "Point-of-care estimated radiation exposure and imaging guidelines can reduce pediatric radiation burden",
abstract = "Introduction: The steady increase in the use of computed tomography (CT) has particular concerns for children. Family physicians must often select pediatric imaging without any decision support. We hypothesized that point-of-care decision support would lead to the selection of imaging that lowered radiation exposure and improved guideline congruence. Methods: Our double-blind, randomized simulation included family physicians in the Military Health System. Participants initially reviewed a pediatric hematuria scenario and selected imaging without decision support. Participants were subsequently randomized to either receive imaging-appropriateness guidelines and then estimated radiation exposure information or receive estimated radiation information then guidelines; imaging selections were required after each step. The primary outcome was the selected imaging modality with point-of-care decision support. Results: The first arm increased CT ordering after viewing the guidelines (P = .008) but then decreased it after reviewing radiation exposure information (P = .007). In the second arm radiation information decreased CT and plain film use (P = not significant), with a subsequent increase in ultrasound and CT after the guideline presentation (P = .05). Conclusions: Decision support during a simulated pediatric scenario helped family physicians select imaging that lowered radiation exposure and was aligned with current guidelines, especially when presented with radiation information after guideline review. This information could help inform electronic medical record design.",
author = "Bunt, {Christopher W.} and Burke, {Harry B.} and Towbin, {Alexander J.} and Albert Hoang and Mark Stephens and Paul Fontelo and Fang Liu and Gimbel, {Ronald W.}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140251",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "343--350",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "3",

}

Point-of-care estimated radiation exposure and imaging guidelines can reduce pediatric radiation burden. / Bunt, Christopher W.; Burke, Harry B.; Towbin, Alexander J.; Hoang, Albert; Stephens, Mark; Fontelo, Paul; Liu, Fang; Gimbel, Ronald W.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 3, 01.05.2015, p. 343-350.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Point-of-care estimated radiation exposure and imaging guidelines can reduce pediatric radiation burden

AU - Bunt, Christopher W.

AU - Burke, Harry B.

AU - Towbin, Alexander J.

AU - Hoang, Albert

AU - Stephens, Mark

AU - Fontelo, Paul

AU - Liu, Fang

AU - Gimbel, Ronald W.

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Introduction: The steady increase in the use of computed tomography (CT) has particular concerns for children. Family physicians must often select pediatric imaging without any decision support. We hypothesized that point-of-care decision support would lead to the selection of imaging that lowered radiation exposure and improved guideline congruence. Methods: Our double-blind, randomized simulation included family physicians in the Military Health System. Participants initially reviewed a pediatric hematuria scenario and selected imaging without decision support. Participants were subsequently randomized to either receive imaging-appropriateness guidelines and then estimated radiation exposure information or receive estimated radiation information then guidelines; imaging selections were required after each step. The primary outcome was the selected imaging modality with point-of-care decision support. Results: The first arm increased CT ordering after viewing the guidelines (P = .008) but then decreased it after reviewing radiation exposure information (P = .007). In the second arm radiation information decreased CT and plain film use (P = not significant), with a subsequent increase in ultrasound and CT after the guideline presentation (P = .05). Conclusions: Decision support during a simulated pediatric scenario helped family physicians select imaging that lowered radiation exposure and was aligned with current guidelines, especially when presented with radiation information after guideline review. This information could help inform electronic medical record design.

AB - Introduction: The steady increase in the use of computed tomography (CT) has particular concerns for children. Family physicians must often select pediatric imaging without any decision support. We hypothesized that point-of-care decision support would lead to the selection of imaging that lowered radiation exposure and improved guideline congruence. Methods: Our double-blind, randomized simulation included family physicians in the Military Health System. Participants initially reviewed a pediatric hematuria scenario and selected imaging without decision support. Participants were subsequently randomized to either receive imaging-appropriateness guidelines and then estimated radiation exposure information or receive estimated radiation information then guidelines; imaging selections were required after each step. The primary outcome was the selected imaging modality with point-of-care decision support. Results: The first arm increased CT ordering after viewing the guidelines (P = .008) but then decreased it after reviewing radiation exposure information (P = .007). In the second arm radiation information decreased CT and plain film use (P = not significant), with a subsequent increase in ultrasound and CT after the guideline presentation (P = .05). Conclusions: Decision support during a simulated pediatric scenario helped family physicians select imaging that lowered radiation exposure and was aligned with current guidelines, especially when presented with radiation information after guideline review. This information could help inform electronic medical record design.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929298821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929298821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140251

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140251

M3 - Article

C2 - 25957367

AN - SCOPUS:84929298821

VL - 28

SP - 343

EP - 350

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 3

ER -