Points of departure: Insiders, outsiders, and social relations in caribbean field research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In traditional ethnographies, it is customarily assumed that the field researcher is an outsider who seeks to acquire an insider's understanding of the social world being investigated. While conducting field research projects on education and tourism in Trinidad (West Indies) we found that the standard distinction between insider and outsider became problematic for us. Our experiences can be understood in terms of two competing conceptions of fieldwork. One, rooted in classical ethnography, views fieldwork as a process whereby the researcher learns to translate the cultural practices of a little-known or misunderstood group into terms understandable to the ethnographic audience. The other, growing out of the institutional ethnography approach pioneered by Dorothy E. Smith, views fieldwork as a process of mapping the relations that govern an institutional complex. In the latter approach, local experiences provide the point of departure for exploring a wider set of social arrangements. In this article, we treat our own fieldwork experiences as points of departure for a reflexive examination of this alternative ethnographic strategy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)291-312
Number of pages22
JournalHuman Studies
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009

Fingerprint

field research
Social Relations
ethnography
experience
Caribbean Region
research project
Tourism
examination
Outsider
Field Research
Field Work
education
Group
Ethnography
Ethnographic

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{75dab42248b449489f4a956973258790,
title = "Points of departure: Insiders, outsiders, and social relations in caribbean field research",
abstract = "In traditional ethnographies, it is customarily assumed that the field researcher is an outsider who seeks to acquire an insider's understanding of the social world being investigated. While conducting field research projects on education and tourism in Trinidad (West Indies) we found that the standard distinction between insider and outsider became problematic for us. Our experiences can be understood in terms of two competing conceptions of fieldwork. One, rooted in classical ethnography, views fieldwork as a process whereby the researcher learns to translate the cultural practices of a little-known or misunderstood group into terms understandable to the ethnographic audience. The other, growing out of the institutional ethnography approach pioneered by Dorothy E. Smith, views fieldwork as a process of mapping the relations that govern an institutional complex. In the latter approach, local experiences provide the point of departure for exploring a wider set of social arrangements. In this article, we treat our own fieldwork experiences as points of departure for a reflexive examination of this alternative ethnographic strategy.",
author = "Grahame, {Peter R.} and Grahame, {Kamini Maraj}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10746-009-9121-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "291--312",
journal = "Human Studies",
issn = "0163-8548",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

Points of departure : Insiders, outsiders, and social relations in caribbean field research. / Grahame, Peter R.; Grahame, Kamini Maraj.

In: Human Studies, Vol. 32, No. 3, 01.12.2009, p. 291-312.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Points of departure

T2 - Insiders, outsiders, and social relations in caribbean field research

AU - Grahame, Peter R.

AU - Grahame, Kamini Maraj

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - In traditional ethnographies, it is customarily assumed that the field researcher is an outsider who seeks to acquire an insider's understanding of the social world being investigated. While conducting field research projects on education and tourism in Trinidad (West Indies) we found that the standard distinction between insider and outsider became problematic for us. Our experiences can be understood in terms of two competing conceptions of fieldwork. One, rooted in classical ethnography, views fieldwork as a process whereby the researcher learns to translate the cultural practices of a little-known or misunderstood group into terms understandable to the ethnographic audience. The other, growing out of the institutional ethnography approach pioneered by Dorothy E. Smith, views fieldwork as a process of mapping the relations that govern an institutional complex. In the latter approach, local experiences provide the point of departure for exploring a wider set of social arrangements. In this article, we treat our own fieldwork experiences as points of departure for a reflexive examination of this alternative ethnographic strategy.

AB - In traditional ethnographies, it is customarily assumed that the field researcher is an outsider who seeks to acquire an insider's understanding of the social world being investigated. While conducting field research projects on education and tourism in Trinidad (West Indies) we found that the standard distinction between insider and outsider became problematic for us. Our experiences can be understood in terms of two competing conceptions of fieldwork. One, rooted in classical ethnography, views fieldwork as a process whereby the researcher learns to translate the cultural practices of a little-known or misunderstood group into terms understandable to the ethnographic audience. The other, growing out of the institutional ethnography approach pioneered by Dorothy E. Smith, views fieldwork as a process of mapping the relations that govern an institutional complex. In the latter approach, local experiences provide the point of departure for exploring a wider set of social arrangements. In this article, we treat our own fieldwork experiences as points of departure for a reflexive examination of this alternative ethnographic strategy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72749126819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72749126819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10746-009-9121-5

DO - 10.1007/s10746-009-9121-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:72749126819

VL - 32

SP - 291

EP - 312

JO - Human Studies

JF - Human Studies

SN - 0163-8548

IS - 3

ER -