Policies related to opioid agonist therapy for opioid use disorders: The evolution of state policies from 2004 to 2013

Rachel M. Burns, Rosalie L. Pacula, Sebastian Bauhoff, Adam J. Gordon, Hollie Hendrikson, Douglas Leslie, Bradley D. Stein

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: State Medicaid policies play an important role in Medicaid enrollees' access to and use of opioid agonists, such as methadone and buprenorphine, in the treatment of opioid use disorders. Little information is available, however, regarding the evolution of state policies facilitating or hindering access to opioid agonists among Medicaid enrollees. Methods: During 2013-2014, we surveyed state Medicaid officials and other designated state substance abuse treatment specialists about their state's recent history of Medicaid coverage and policies pertaining to methadone and buprenorphine. We describe the evolution of such coverage and policies and present an overview of the Medicaid policy environment with respect to opioid agonist therapy from 2004 to 2013. Results: Among our sample of 45 states with information on buprenorphine and methadone coverage, we found a gradual trend toward adoption of coverage for opioid agonist therapies in state Medicaid agencies. In 2013, only 11% of states in our sample (n = 5) had Medicaid policies that excluded coverage for methadone and buprenorphine, whereas 71% (n = 32) had adopted or maintained policies to cover both buprenorphine and methadone among Medicaid enrollees. We also noted an increase in policies over the time period that may have hindered access to buprenorphine and/or methadone. Conclusions: There appears to be a trend for states to enact policies increasing Medicaid coverage of opioid agonist therapies, while in recent years also enacting policies, such as prior authorization requirements, that potentially serve as barriers to opioid agonist therapy utilization. Greater empirical information about the potential benefits and potential unintended consequences of such policies can provide policymakers and others with a more informed understanding of their policy decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63-69
Number of pages7
JournalSubstance Abuse
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2016

Fingerprint

Opioid Analgesics
Medicaid
Buprenorphine
Methadone
Therapeutics
Substance-Related Disorders

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Burns, Rachel M. ; Pacula, Rosalie L. ; Bauhoff, Sebastian ; Gordon, Adam J. ; Hendrikson, Hollie ; Leslie, Douglas ; Stein, Bradley D. / Policies related to opioid agonist therapy for opioid use disorders : The evolution of state policies from 2004 to 2013. In: Substance Abuse. 2016 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 63-69.
@article{aa2fb1e4f4bc40c3988936df6ba277ea,
title = "Policies related to opioid agonist therapy for opioid use disorders: The evolution of state policies from 2004 to 2013",
abstract = "Background: State Medicaid policies play an important role in Medicaid enrollees' access to and use of opioid agonists, such as methadone and buprenorphine, in the treatment of opioid use disorders. Little information is available, however, regarding the evolution of state policies facilitating or hindering access to opioid agonists among Medicaid enrollees. Methods: During 2013-2014, we surveyed state Medicaid officials and other designated state substance abuse treatment specialists about their state's recent history of Medicaid coverage and policies pertaining to methadone and buprenorphine. We describe the evolution of such coverage and policies and present an overview of the Medicaid policy environment with respect to opioid agonist therapy from 2004 to 2013. Results: Among our sample of 45 states with information on buprenorphine and methadone coverage, we found a gradual trend toward adoption of coverage for opioid agonist therapies in state Medicaid agencies. In 2013, only 11{\%} of states in our sample (n = 5) had Medicaid policies that excluded coverage for methadone and buprenorphine, whereas 71{\%} (n = 32) had adopted or maintained policies to cover both buprenorphine and methadone among Medicaid enrollees. We also noted an increase in policies over the time period that may have hindered access to buprenorphine and/or methadone. Conclusions: There appears to be a trend for states to enact policies increasing Medicaid coverage of opioid agonist therapies, while in recent years also enacting policies, such as prior authorization requirements, that potentially serve as barriers to opioid agonist therapy utilization. Greater empirical information about the potential benefits and potential unintended consequences of such policies can provide policymakers and others with a more informed understanding of their policy decisions.",
author = "Burns, {Rachel M.} and Pacula, {Rosalie L.} and Sebastian Bauhoff and Gordon, {Adam J.} and Hollie Hendrikson and Douglas Leslie and Stein, {Bradley D.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/08897077.2015.1080208",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "63--69",
journal = "Substance Abuse",
issn = "0889-7077",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Policies related to opioid agonist therapy for opioid use disorders : The evolution of state policies from 2004 to 2013. / Burns, Rachel M.; Pacula, Rosalie L.; Bauhoff, Sebastian; Gordon, Adam J.; Hendrikson, Hollie; Leslie, Douglas; Stein, Bradley D.

In: Substance Abuse, Vol. 37, No. 1, 02.01.2016, p. 63-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policies related to opioid agonist therapy for opioid use disorders

T2 - The evolution of state policies from 2004 to 2013

AU - Burns, Rachel M.

AU - Pacula, Rosalie L.

AU - Bauhoff, Sebastian

AU - Gordon, Adam J.

AU - Hendrikson, Hollie

AU - Leslie, Douglas

AU - Stein, Bradley D.

PY - 2016/1/2

Y1 - 2016/1/2

N2 - Background: State Medicaid policies play an important role in Medicaid enrollees' access to and use of opioid agonists, such as methadone and buprenorphine, in the treatment of opioid use disorders. Little information is available, however, regarding the evolution of state policies facilitating or hindering access to opioid agonists among Medicaid enrollees. Methods: During 2013-2014, we surveyed state Medicaid officials and other designated state substance abuse treatment specialists about their state's recent history of Medicaid coverage and policies pertaining to methadone and buprenorphine. We describe the evolution of such coverage and policies and present an overview of the Medicaid policy environment with respect to opioid agonist therapy from 2004 to 2013. Results: Among our sample of 45 states with information on buprenorphine and methadone coverage, we found a gradual trend toward adoption of coverage for opioid agonist therapies in state Medicaid agencies. In 2013, only 11% of states in our sample (n = 5) had Medicaid policies that excluded coverage for methadone and buprenorphine, whereas 71% (n = 32) had adopted or maintained policies to cover both buprenorphine and methadone among Medicaid enrollees. We also noted an increase in policies over the time period that may have hindered access to buprenorphine and/or methadone. Conclusions: There appears to be a trend for states to enact policies increasing Medicaid coverage of opioid agonist therapies, while in recent years also enacting policies, such as prior authorization requirements, that potentially serve as barriers to opioid agonist therapy utilization. Greater empirical information about the potential benefits and potential unintended consequences of such policies can provide policymakers and others with a more informed understanding of their policy decisions.

AB - Background: State Medicaid policies play an important role in Medicaid enrollees' access to and use of opioid agonists, such as methadone and buprenorphine, in the treatment of opioid use disorders. Little information is available, however, regarding the evolution of state policies facilitating or hindering access to opioid agonists among Medicaid enrollees. Methods: During 2013-2014, we surveyed state Medicaid officials and other designated state substance abuse treatment specialists about their state's recent history of Medicaid coverage and policies pertaining to methadone and buprenorphine. We describe the evolution of such coverage and policies and present an overview of the Medicaid policy environment with respect to opioid agonist therapy from 2004 to 2013. Results: Among our sample of 45 states with information on buprenorphine and methadone coverage, we found a gradual trend toward adoption of coverage for opioid agonist therapies in state Medicaid agencies. In 2013, only 11% of states in our sample (n = 5) had Medicaid policies that excluded coverage for methadone and buprenorphine, whereas 71% (n = 32) had adopted or maintained policies to cover both buprenorphine and methadone among Medicaid enrollees. We also noted an increase in policies over the time period that may have hindered access to buprenorphine and/or methadone. Conclusions: There appears to be a trend for states to enact policies increasing Medicaid coverage of opioid agonist therapies, while in recent years also enacting policies, such as prior authorization requirements, that potentially serve as barriers to opioid agonist therapy utilization. Greater empirical information about the potential benefits and potential unintended consequences of such policies can provide policymakers and others with a more informed understanding of their policy decisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959062104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959062104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08897077.2015.1080208

DO - 10.1080/08897077.2015.1080208

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26566761

AN - SCOPUS:84959062104

VL - 37

SP - 63

EP - 69

JO - Substance Abuse

JF - Substance Abuse

SN - 0889-7077

IS - 1

ER -