Policing the perimeter: Disgust and purity in democratic debate

Peter Hatemi, Rose McDermott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We explicate the precise role that one specific emotion, disgust, plays in generating political acrimony. We do this by identifying the link between the different dimensions along which moral judgments are made by those espousing different political ideologies and the different emotions which undergird these evaluations. These assessments reliably track along liberal and conservative dimensions and are linked to the way values associated with purity and sanctity elicit greater degrees of disgust among conservatives. Here, we review a growing literature showing how disgust affects the psychology of politics through its influence on the cognitive and emotional processes that govern judgments of morality, as well as its direct impact on specific policy preferences. We then apply these findings to the nature and tenor of political discourse and suggest some ways that disgust might affect the character and function of democratic debate and tolerance. Finally, we discuss what these findings mean for public policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)675-687
Number of pages13
JournalPS - Political Science and Politics
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2012

Fingerprint

emotion
moral judgement
political ideology
morality
tolerance
public policy
psychology
politics
discourse
evaluation
Values
literature

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{fb6982828f54497199e4a582a9f639f9,
title = "Policing the perimeter: Disgust and purity in democratic debate",
abstract = "We explicate the precise role that one specific emotion, disgust, plays in generating political acrimony. We do this by identifying the link between the different dimensions along which moral judgments are made by those espousing different political ideologies and the different emotions which undergird these evaluations. These assessments reliably track along liberal and conservative dimensions and are linked to the way values associated with purity and sanctity elicit greater degrees of disgust among conservatives. Here, we review a growing literature showing how disgust affects the psychology of politics through its influence on the cognitive and emotional processes that govern judgments of morality, as well as its direct impact on specific policy preferences. We then apply these findings to the nature and tenor of political discourse and suggest some ways that disgust might affect the character and function of democratic debate and tolerance. Finally, we discuss what these findings mean for public policy.",
author = "Peter Hatemi and Rose McDermott",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1049096512000686",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "675--687",
journal = "PS - Political Science and Politics",
issn = "1049-0965",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

Policing the perimeter : Disgust and purity in democratic debate. / Hatemi, Peter; McDermott, Rose.

In: PS - Political Science and Politics, Vol. 45, No. 4, 01.10.2012, p. 675-687.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policing the perimeter

T2 - Disgust and purity in democratic debate

AU - Hatemi, Peter

AU - McDermott, Rose

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - We explicate the precise role that one specific emotion, disgust, plays in generating political acrimony. We do this by identifying the link between the different dimensions along which moral judgments are made by those espousing different political ideologies and the different emotions which undergird these evaluations. These assessments reliably track along liberal and conservative dimensions and are linked to the way values associated with purity and sanctity elicit greater degrees of disgust among conservatives. Here, we review a growing literature showing how disgust affects the psychology of politics through its influence on the cognitive and emotional processes that govern judgments of morality, as well as its direct impact on specific policy preferences. We then apply these findings to the nature and tenor of political discourse and suggest some ways that disgust might affect the character and function of democratic debate and tolerance. Finally, we discuss what these findings mean for public policy.

AB - We explicate the precise role that one specific emotion, disgust, plays in generating political acrimony. We do this by identifying the link between the different dimensions along which moral judgments are made by those espousing different political ideologies and the different emotions which undergird these evaluations. These assessments reliably track along liberal and conservative dimensions and are linked to the way values associated with purity and sanctity elicit greater degrees of disgust among conservatives. Here, we review a growing literature showing how disgust affects the psychology of politics through its influence on the cognitive and emotional processes that govern judgments of morality, as well as its direct impact on specific policy preferences. We then apply these findings to the nature and tenor of political discourse and suggest some ways that disgust might affect the character and function of democratic debate and tolerance. Finally, we discuss what these findings mean for public policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870194351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870194351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1049096512000686

DO - 10.1017/S1049096512000686

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84870194351

VL - 45

SP - 675

EP - 687

JO - PS - Political Science and Politics

JF - PS - Political Science and Politics

SN - 1049-0965

IS - 4

ER -