Policymaking in education: Understanding influences on the Reading Excellence Act

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Educators and researchers are being called to participate in language and literacy policy making (Roller & Long, 2001). In order to do so, however, there needs to be an understanding of how policy is made. Although policymaking often appears to be an irrational process, there are theories that exist to explain the influences and mechanisms that work to shape policies. In what follows, I adapt Theodoulou and Cahn's (1995) typology on policymaking in order to discuss how policy is made. These theories of policymaking are explored within the context of the Reading Excellence Act to demonstrate how policymaking is read and explained Given the limitations of these explanations, particularly the sense that there maybe no explicit role for educators in such a process, an alternate theory of policymaking, critical pluralism, is proposed This alternate typology suggests different roles for educators in relation to policymaking.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number11
Pages (from-to)1-26
Number of pages26
JournalEducation Policy Analysis Archives
Volume13
StatePublished - Feb 3 2005

Fingerprint

act
educator
typology
education
pluralism
literacy
language

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

@article{1e3fc59f64154ad3b63937aa1fb6f2aa,
title = "Policymaking in education: Understanding influences on the Reading Excellence Act",
abstract = "Educators and researchers are being called to participate in language and literacy policy making (Roller & Long, 2001). In order to do so, however, there needs to be an understanding of how policy is made. Although policymaking often appears to be an irrational process, there are theories that exist to explain the influences and mechanisms that work to shape policies. In what follows, I adapt Theodoulou and Cahn's (1995) typology on policymaking in order to discuss how policy is made. These theories of policymaking are explored within the context of the Reading Excellence Act to demonstrate how policymaking is read and explained Given the limitations of these explanations, particularly the sense that there maybe no explicit role for educators in such a process, an alternate theory of policymaking, critical pluralism, is proposed This alternate typology suggests different roles for educators in relation to policymaking.",
author = "Jacqueline Edmondson",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
day = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "1--26",
journal = "Education Policy Analysis Archives",
issn = "1068-2341",
publisher = "Arizona State University",

}

Policymaking in education : Understanding influences on the Reading Excellence Act. / Edmondson, Jacqueline.

In: Education Policy Analysis Archives, Vol. 13, 11, 03.02.2005, p. 1-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policymaking in education

T2 - Understanding influences on the Reading Excellence Act

AU - Edmondson, Jacqueline

PY - 2005/2/3

Y1 - 2005/2/3

N2 - Educators and researchers are being called to participate in language and literacy policy making (Roller & Long, 2001). In order to do so, however, there needs to be an understanding of how policy is made. Although policymaking often appears to be an irrational process, there are theories that exist to explain the influences and mechanisms that work to shape policies. In what follows, I adapt Theodoulou and Cahn's (1995) typology on policymaking in order to discuss how policy is made. These theories of policymaking are explored within the context of the Reading Excellence Act to demonstrate how policymaking is read and explained Given the limitations of these explanations, particularly the sense that there maybe no explicit role for educators in such a process, an alternate theory of policymaking, critical pluralism, is proposed This alternate typology suggests different roles for educators in relation to policymaking.

AB - Educators and researchers are being called to participate in language and literacy policy making (Roller & Long, 2001). In order to do so, however, there needs to be an understanding of how policy is made. Although policymaking often appears to be an irrational process, there are theories that exist to explain the influences and mechanisms that work to shape policies. In what follows, I adapt Theodoulou and Cahn's (1995) typology on policymaking in order to discuss how policy is made. These theories of policymaking are explored within the context of the Reading Excellence Act to demonstrate how policymaking is read and explained Given the limitations of these explanations, particularly the sense that there maybe no explicit role for educators in such a process, an alternate theory of policymaking, critical pluralism, is proposed This alternate typology suggests different roles for educators in relation to policymaking.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14744292281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14744292281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:14744292281

VL - 13

SP - 1

EP - 26

JO - Education Policy Analysis Archives

JF - Education Policy Analysis Archives

SN - 1068-2341

M1 - 11

ER -