Political Corruption in America

A Search for Definitions and a Theory, or If Political Corruption Is in the Mainstream of American Politics Why Is It Not in the Mainstream of American Politics Research?

John G. Peters, Susan Welch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lack of a clear definition of political corruption has limited its systematic study by analysts of American politics. This article offers a conceptual framework with which to view corruption. A corrupt act is categorized by its four components: the donor, the favor, the public official and the payoff. For each component, propositions about perceived corrupt and noncorrupt elements can be formulated and tested. The usefulness of this scheme in analyzing attitudes about corruption is demonstrated with data from state legislators. Finally, the article suggests some future research possibilities using this scheme to compare elites and public or other groupings in the political system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)974-984
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
Volume72
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1978

Fingerprint

corruption
politics
grouping
political system
elite
lack

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{b23c1312f799456389cbb1abd530e56c,
title = "Political Corruption in America: A Search for Definitions and a Theory, or If Political Corruption Is in the Mainstream of American Politics Why Is It Not in the Mainstream of American Politics Research?",
abstract = "Lack of a clear definition of political corruption has limited its systematic study by analysts of American politics. This article offers a conceptual framework with which to view corruption. A corrupt act is categorized by its four components: the donor, the favor, the public official and the payoff. For each component, propositions about perceived corrupt and noncorrupt elements can be formulated and tested. The usefulness of this scheme in analyzing attitudes about corruption is demonstrated with data from state legislators. Finally, the article suggests some future research possibilities using this scheme to compare elites and public or other groupings in the political system.",
author = "Peters, {John G.} and Susan Welch",
year = "1978",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/1955115",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "974--984",
journal = "American Political Science Review",
issn = "0003-0554",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Political Corruption in America

T2 - A Search for Definitions and a Theory, or If Political Corruption Is in the Mainstream of American Politics Why Is It Not in the Mainstream of American Politics Research?

AU - Peters, John G.

AU - Welch, Susan

PY - 1978/1/1

Y1 - 1978/1/1

N2 - Lack of a clear definition of political corruption has limited its systematic study by analysts of American politics. This article offers a conceptual framework with which to view corruption. A corrupt act is categorized by its four components: the donor, the favor, the public official and the payoff. For each component, propositions about perceived corrupt and noncorrupt elements can be formulated and tested. The usefulness of this scheme in analyzing attitudes about corruption is demonstrated with data from state legislators. Finally, the article suggests some future research possibilities using this scheme to compare elites and public or other groupings in the political system.

AB - Lack of a clear definition of political corruption has limited its systematic study by analysts of American politics. This article offers a conceptual framework with which to view corruption. A corrupt act is categorized by its four components: the donor, the favor, the public official and the payoff. For each component, propositions about perceived corrupt and noncorrupt elements can be formulated and tested. The usefulness of this scheme in analyzing attitudes about corruption is demonstrated with data from state legislators. Finally, the article suggests some future research possibilities using this scheme to compare elites and public or other groupings in the political system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973961574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973961574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/1955115

DO - 10.2307/1955115

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 974

EP - 984

JO - American Political Science Review

JF - American Political Science Review

SN - 0003-0554

IS - 3

ER -