TY - JOUR
T1 - Political Corruption in America
T2 - A Search for Definitions and a Theory, or If Political Corruption Is in the Mainstream of American Politics Why Is It Not in the Mainstream of American Politics Research?
AU - Peters, John G.
AU - Welch, Susan
PY - 1978/9
Y1 - 1978/9
N2 - Lack of a clear definition of political corruption has limited its systematic study by analysts of American politics. This article offers a conceptual framework with which to view corruption. A corrupt act is categorized by its four components: the donor, the favor, the public official and the payoff. For each component, propositions about perceived corrupt and noncorrupt elements can be formulated and tested. The usefulness of this scheme in analyzing attitudes about corruption is demonstrated with data from state legislators. Finally, the article suggests some future research possibilities using this scheme to compare elites and public or other groupings in the political system.
AB - Lack of a clear definition of political corruption has limited its systematic study by analysts of American politics. This article offers a conceptual framework with which to view corruption. A corrupt act is categorized by its four components: the donor, the favor, the public official and the payoff. For each component, propositions about perceived corrupt and noncorrupt elements can be formulated and tested. The usefulness of this scheme in analyzing attitudes about corruption is demonstrated with data from state legislators. Finally, the article suggests some future research possibilities using this scheme to compare elites and public or other groupings in the political system.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973961574&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973961574&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2307/1955115
DO - 10.2307/1955115
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84973961574
SN - 0003-0554
VL - 72
SP - 974
EP - 984
JO - American Political Science Review
JF - American Political Science Review
IS - 3
ER -