Pop (Up) goes the Blind Date: Supertextual constraints on "reality" television

Justin DeRose, Elfriede Fürsich, Ekaterina V. Haskins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this textual analysis of the reality dating show Blind Date, the authors challenge the recent cultural studies scholarship that champions textual openness of reality television. In particular, the authors demonstrate how the pop-up supertext in Blind Date undermines the counterhegemonic potential of this show with regard to gender, class, and ethnic representations. The authors find that the interplay between the comic supertext and the dating coverage tends to punish deviance from dominant conceptions of aesthetics, class, social, and intellectual abilities. The analysis highlights the limits of textual polysemy in the new generation of interactive or enhanced television formats.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-189
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Communication Inquiry
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2003

Fingerprint

Television
television
format television
deviant behavior
cultural studies
aesthetics
coverage
gender
ability
Reality Television
Cultural Studies
Conception
Openness
Deviance
Textual Analysis
Polysemy
Aesthetics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cultural Studies
  • Communication
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{15292abd19cc4756bd4da4731c7095cc,
title = "Pop (Up) goes the Blind Date: Supertextual constraints on {"}reality{"} television",
abstract = "In this textual analysis of the reality dating show Blind Date, the authors challenge the recent cultural studies scholarship that champions textual openness of reality television. In particular, the authors demonstrate how the pop-up supertext in Blind Date undermines the counterhegemonic potential of this show with regard to gender, class, and ethnic representations. The authors find that the interplay between the comic supertext and the dating coverage tends to punish deviance from dominant conceptions of aesthetics, class, social, and intellectual abilities. The analysis highlights the limits of textual polysemy in the new generation of interactive or enhanced television formats.",
author = "Justin DeRose and Elfriede F{\"u}rsich and Haskins, {Ekaterina V.}",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0196859902250865",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "171--189",
journal = "Journal of Communication Inquiry",
issn = "0196-8599",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Pop (Up) goes the Blind Date : Supertextual constraints on "reality" television. / DeRose, Justin; Fürsich, Elfriede; Haskins, Ekaterina V.

In: Journal of Communication Inquiry, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.12.2003, p. 171-189.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pop (Up) goes the Blind Date

T2 - Supertextual constraints on "reality" television

AU - DeRose, Justin

AU - Fürsich, Elfriede

AU - Haskins, Ekaterina V.

PY - 2003/12/1

Y1 - 2003/12/1

N2 - In this textual analysis of the reality dating show Blind Date, the authors challenge the recent cultural studies scholarship that champions textual openness of reality television. In particular, the authors demonstrate how the pop-up supertext in Blind Date undermines the counterhegemonic potential of this show with regard to gender, class, and ethnic representations. The authors find that the interplay between the comic supertext and the dating coverage tends to punish deviance from dominant conceptions of aesthetics, class, social, and intellectual abilities. The analysis highlights the limits of textual polysemy in the new generation of interactive or enhanced television formats.

AB - In this textual analysis of the reality dating show Blind Date, the authors challenge the recent cultural studies scholarship that champions textual openness of reality television. In particular, the authors demonstrate how the pop-up supertext in Blind Date undermines the counterhegemonic potential of this show with regard to gender, class, and ethnic representations. The authors find that the interplay between the comic supertext and the dating coverage tends to punish deviance from dominant conceptions of aesthetics, class, social, and intellectual abilities. The analysis highlights the limits of textual polysemy in the new generation of interactive or enhanced television formats.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746023892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746023892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0196859902250865

DO - 10.1177/0196859902250865

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33746023892

VL - 27

SP - 171

EP - 189

JO - Journal of Communication Inquiry

JF - Journal of Communication Inquiry

SN - 0196-8599

IS - 2

ER -