TY - JOUR
T1 - Population response to climate change
T2 - Linear vs. non-linear modeling approaches
AU - Ellis, Alicia M.
AU - Post, Eric
PY - 2004/3/31
Y1 - 2004/3/31
N2 - Background: Research on the ecological consequences of global climate change has elicited a growing interest in the use of time series analysis to investigate population dynamics in a changing climate. Here, we compare linear and non-linear models describing the contribution of climate to the density fluctuations of the population of wolves on Isle Royale, Michigan from 1959 to 1999. Results: The non-linear self excitatory threshold autoregressive (SETAR) model revealed that, due to differences in the strength and nature of density dependence, relatively small and large populations may be differentially affected by future changes in climate. Both linear and non-linear models predict a decrease in the population of wolves with predicted changes in climate. Conclusions: Because specific predictions differed between linear and non-linear models, our study highlights the importance of using non-linear methods that allow the detection of non-linearity in the strength and nature of density dependence. Failure to adopt a non-linear approach to modelling population response to climate change, either exclusively or in addition to linear approaches, may compromise efforts to quantify ecological consequences of future warming.
AB - Background: Research on the ecological consequences of global climate change has elicited a growing interest in the use of time series analysis to investigate population dynamics in a changing climate. Here, we compare linear and non-linear models describing the contribution of climate to the density fluctuations of the population of wolves on Isle Royale, Michigan from 1959 to 1999. Results: The non-linear self excitatory threshold autoregressive (SETAR) model revealed that, due to differences in the strength and nature of density dependence, relatively small and large populations may be differentially affected by future changes in climate. Both linear and non-linear models predict a decrease in the population of wolves with predicted changes in climate. Conclusions: Because specific predictions differed between linear and non-linear models, our study highlights the importance of using non-linear methods that allow the detection of non-linearity in the strength and nature of density dependence. Failure to adopt a non-linear approach to modelling population response to climate change, either exclusively or in addition to linear approaches, may compromise efforts to quantify ecological consequences of future warming.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2942594356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2942594356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1472-6785-4-2
DO - 10.1186/1472-6785-4-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 15056394
AN - SCOPUS:2942594356
SN - 1472-6785
VL - 4
JO - BMC Ecology and Evolution
JF - BMC Ecology and Evolution
M1 - 2
ER -