Portfolio allocation and the vote of no confidence

Sona N. Golder, Jacquelyn A. Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations


There is a contradiction between theory and empirics with respect to portfolio allocation in parliamentary democracies. While the canonical model of legislative bargaining predicts the existence of a 'formateur bonus', empirical studies show that portfolios are allocated in a manner that favours smaller parties. This article argues that the difference between the empirical pattern and the theoretical predictions can be explained by the vote of no confidence, which provides an incentive for large formateur parties to overcompensate smaller coalition partners in exchange for their sustained support over time. This argument is tested by exploiting variations in the presence of no confidence votes across national and regional levels in France. As predicted, we find that larger formateur parties receive a greater share of portfolios if the vote of no confidence is absent than if it is present.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-39
Number of pages11
JournalBritish Journal of Political Science
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Portfolio allocation and the vote of no confidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this