Positive end-expiratory pressure lower than the ards network protocol is associated with higher pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome mortality

Robinder G. Khemani, Kaushik Parvathaneni, Nadir Yehya, Anoopindar K. Bhalla, Neal J. Thomas, Christopher J.L. Newth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale: The ARDS Network (ARDSNet) used a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)/FIO2 model in many studies. In general, pediatric intensivists use less PEEP and higher FIO2 than this model. Objectives: To evaluate whether children managed with PEEP lower than recommended by the ARDSNet PEEP/FIO2 model had higher mortality. Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) managed without a formal PEEP/FIO2 protocol. Four distinct datasets were combined for analysis. We extracted time-matched PEEP/FIO2 values, calculating the difference between PEEP level and the ARDSNet-recommended PEEP level for a given FIO2. We analyzed the median difference over the first 24 hours of PARDS diagnosis against ICU mortality and adjusted for confounding variables, effect modifiers, or factors that may have affected the propensity to use lower PEEP. Measurements and Main Results: Of the 1,134 patients with PARDS, 26.6% were managed with lower PEEP relative to the amount of FIO2 recommended by the ARDSNet protocol. Patients managed with lower PEEP experienced higher mortality than those who were managed with PEEP levels in line with or higher than recommended by the protocol (P <0.001). After adjustment for hypoxemia, inotropes, comorbidities, severity of illness, ventilator settings, nitric oxide, and dataset, PEEP lower than recommended by the protocol remained independently associated with higher mortality (odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-3.17). Findings were similar after propensity-based covariate adjustment (odds ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-3.22). Conclusions: Patients with PARDS managed with lower PEEP relative to FIO2 than recommended by the ARDSNet model had higher mortality. Clinical trials targeting PEEP management in PARDS are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)77-89
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
Volume198
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Positive-Pressure Respiration
Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Pediatrics
Mortality
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Mechanical Ventilators

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Khemani, Robinder G. ; Parvathaneni, Kaushik ; Yehya, Nadir ; Bhalla, Anoopindar K. ; Thomas, Neal J. ; Newth, Christopher J.L. / Positive end-expiratory pressure lower than the ards network protocol is associated with higher pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome mortality. In: American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 198, No. 1. pp. 77-89.
@article{921b59d2e5184f0f92fc92dc11580ae4,
title = "Positive end-expiratory pressure lower than the ards network protocol is associated with higher pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome mortality",
abstract = "Rationale: The ARDS Network (ARDSNet) used a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)/FIO2 model in many studies. In general, pediatric intensivists use less PEEP and higher FIO2 than this model. Objectives: To evaluate whether children managed with PEEP lower than recommended by the ARDSNet PEEP/FIO2 model had higher mortality. Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) managed without a formal PEEP/FIO2 protocol. Four distinct datasets were combined for analysis. We extracted time-matched PEEP/FIO2 values, calculating the difference between PEEP level and the ARDSNet-recommended PEEP level for a given FIO2. We analyzed the median difference over the first 24 hours of PARDS diagnosis against ICU mortality and adjusted for confounding variables, effect modifiers, or factors that may have affected the propensity to use lower PEEP. Measurements and Main Results: Of the 1,134 patients with PARDS, 26.6{\%} were managed with lower PEEP relative to the amount of FIO2 recommended by the ARDSNet protocol. Patients managed with lower PEEP experienced higher mortality than those who were managed with PEEP levels in line with or higher than recommended by the protocol (P <0.001). After adjustment for hypoxemia, inotropes, comorbidities, severity of illness, ventilator settings, nitric oxide, and dataset, PEEP lower than recommended by the protocol remained independently associated with higher mortality (odds ratio, 2.05; 95{\%} confidence interval, 1.32-3.17). Findings were similar after propensity-based covariate adjustment (odds ratio, 2.00; 95{\%} confidence interval, 1.24-3.22). Conclusions: Patients with PARDS managed with lower PEEP relative to FIO2 than recommended by the ARDSNet model had higher mortality. Clinical trials targeting PEEP management in PARDS are needed.",
author = "Khemani, {Robinder G.} and Kaushik Parvathaneni and Nadir Yehya and Bhalla, {Anoopindar K.} and Thomas, {Neal J.} and Newth, {Christopher J.L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1164/rccm.201707-1404OC",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "198",
pages = "77--89",
journal = "American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "1073-449X",
publisher = "American Thoracic Society",
number = "1",

}

Positive end-expiratory pressure lower than the ards network protocol is associated with higher pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome mortality. / Khemani, Robinder G.; Parvathaneni, Kaushik; Yehya, Nadir; Bhalla, Anoopindar K.; Thomas, Neal J.; Newth, Christopher J.L.

In: American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, Vol. 198, No. 1, 01.07.2018, p. 77-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Positive end-expiratory pressure lower than the ards network protocol is associated with higher pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome mortality

AU - Khemani, Robinder G.

AU - Parvathaneni, Kaushik

AU - Yehya, Nadir

AU - Bhalla, Anoopindar K.

AU - Thomas, Neal J.

AU - Newth, Christopher J.L.

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Rationale: The ARDS Network (ARDSNet) used a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)/FIO2 model in many studies. In general, pediatric intensivists use less PEEP and higher FIO2 than this model. Objectives: To evaluate whether children managed with PEEP lower than recommended by the ARDSNet PEEP/FIO2 model had higher mortality. Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) managed without a formal PEEP/FIO2 protocol. Four distinct datasets were combined for analysis. We extracted time-matched PEEP/FIO2 values, calculating the difference between PEEP level and the ARDSNet-recommended PEEP level for a given FIO2. We analyzed the median difference over the first 24 hours of PARDS diagnosis against ICU mortality and adjusted for confounding variables, effect modifiers, or factors that may have affected the propensity to use lower PEEP. Measurements and Main Results: Of the 1,134 patients with PARDS, 26.6% were managed with lower PEEP relative to the amount of FIO2 recommended by the ARDSNet protocol. Patients managed with lower PEEP experienced higher mortality than those who were managed with PEEP levels in line with or higher than recommended by the protocol (P <0.001). After adjustment for hypoxemia, inotropes, comorbidities, severity of illness, ventilator settings, nitric oxide, and dataset, PEEP lower than recommended by the protocol remained independently associated with higher mortality (odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-3.17). Findings were similar after propensity-based covariate adjustment (odds ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-3.22). Conclusions: Patients with PARDS managed with lower PEEP relative to FIO2 than recommended by the ARDSNet model had higher mortality. Clinical trials targeting PEEP management in PARDS are needed.

AB - Rationale: The ARDS Network (ARDSNet) used a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)/FIO2 model in many studies. In general, pediatric intensivists use less PEEP and higher FIO2 than this model. Objectives: To evaluate whether children managed with PEEP lower than recommended by the ARDSNet PEEP/FIO2 model had higher mortality. Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) managed without a formal PEEP/FIO2 protocol. Four distinct datasets were combined for analysis. We extracted time-matched PEEP/FIO2 values, calculating the difference between PEEP level and the ARDSNet-recommended PEEP level for a given FIO2. We analyzed the median difference over the first 24 hours of PARDS diagnosis against ICU mortality and adjusted for confounding variables, effect modifiers, or factors that may have affected the propensity to use lower PEEP. Measurements and Main Results: Of the 1,134 patients with PARDS, 26.6% were managed with lower PEEP relative to the amount of FIO2 recommended by the ARDSNet protocol. Patients managed with lower PEEP experienced higher mortality than those who were managed with PEEP levels in line with or higher than recommended by the protocol (P <0.001). After adjustment for hypoxemia, inotropes, comorbidities, severity of illness, ventilator settings, nitric oxide, and dataset, PEEP lower than recommended by the protocol remained independently associated with higher mortality (odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-3.17). Findings were similar after propensity-based covariate adjustment (odds ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-3.22). Conclusions: Patients with PARDS managed with lower PEEP relative to FIO2 than recommended by the ARDSNet model had higher mortality. Clinical trials targeting PEEP management in PARDS are needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046536660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046536660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1164/rccm.201707-1404OC

DO - 10.1164/rccm.201707-1404OC

M3 - Article

C2 - 29373802

AN - SCOPUS:85046536660

VL - 198

SP - 77

EP - 89

JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

SN - 1073-449X

IS - 1

ER -