Postural stability margins as a function of support surface slopes

Aviroop Dutt-Mazumder, Semyon Slobounov, John Henry Challis, Karl Maxim Newell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This investigation examined the effects of slope of the surface of support (35°, 30°, 20°, 10° Facing(Toe) Down, 0° Flat and 10°, 20°, 25° Facing (Toe) Up) and postural orientation on the margins of postural stability in quiet standing of young adults. The findings showed that the center of pressure CoP (displacement, area and length) had least motion at the baseline (0° Flat) platform condition that progressively increased as a function of platform angle in both facing up and down directions. The virtual time to collision (VTC) dynamics revealed that the spatiooral margins to the functional stability boundary were progressively smaller and the VTC time series also more regular (SampEn±Sample Entropy) as slope angle increased. Surface slope induces a restricted stability region with lower dimension VTC dynamics that is more constrained when postural orientation is facing down the slope. These findings provide further evidence that VTC acts as a control variable in standing posture that is influenced by the emergent dynamics of the individual-environment-task interaction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0164913
JournalPloS one
Volume11
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Toes
Facings
entropy
posture
young adults
Time series
time series analysis
Entropy
Posture
Young Adult
Pressure
Direction compound

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Dutt-Mazumder, Aviroop ; Slobounov, Semyon ; Challis, John Henry ; Newell, Karl Maxim. / Postural stability margins as a function of support surface slopes. In: PloS one. 2016 ; Vol. 11, No. 10.
@article{5b679f956c764df6b320eca201ed7483,
title = "Postural stability margins as a function of support surface slopes",
abstract = "This investigation examined the effects of slope of the surface of support (35°, 30°, 20°, 10° Facing(Toe) Down, 0° Flat and 10°, 20°, 25° Facing (Toe) Up) and postural orientation on the margins of postural stability in quiet standing of young adults. The findings showed that the center of pressure CoP (displacement, area and length) had least motion at the baseline (0° Flat) platform condition that progressively increased as a function of platform angle in both facing up and down directions. The virtual time to collision (VTC) dynamics revealed that the spatiooral margins to the functional stability boundary were progressively smaller and the VTC time series also more regular (SampEn±Sample Entropy) as slope angle increased. Surface slope induces a restricted stability region with lower dimension VTC dynamics that is more constrained when postural orientation is facing down the slope. These findings provide further evidence that VTC acts as a control variable in standing posture that is influenced by the emergent dynamics of the individual-environment-task interaction.",
author = "Aviroop Dutt-Mazumder and Semyon Slobounov and Challis, {John Henry} and Newell, {Karl Maxim}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0164913",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "10",

}

Postural stability margins as a function of support surface slopes. / Dutt-Mazumder, Aviroop; Slobounov, Semyon; Challis, John Henry; Newell, Karl Maxim.

In: PloS one, Vol. 11, No. 10, e0164913, 01.10.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Postural stability margins as a function of support surface slopes

AU - Dutt-Mazumder, Aviroop

AU - Slobounov, Semyon

AU - Challis, John Henry

AU - Newell, Karl Maxim

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - This investigation examined the effects of slope of the surface of support (35°, 30°, 20°, 10° Facing(Toe) Down, 0° Flat and 10°, 20°, 25° Facing (Toe) Up) and postural orientation on the margins of postural stability in quiet standing of young adults. The findings showed that the center of pressure CoP (displacement, area and length) had least motion at the baseline (0° Flat) platform condition that progressively increased as a function of platform angle in both facing up and down directions. The virtual time to collision (VTC) dynamics revealed that the spatiooral margins to the functional stability boundary were progressively smaller and the VTC time series also more regular (SampEn±Sample Entropy) as slope angle increased. Surface slope induces a restricted stability region with lower dimension VTC dynamics that is more constrained when postural orientation is facing down the slope. These findings provide further evidence that VTC acts as a control variable in standing posture that is influenced by the emergent dynamics of the individual-environment-task interaction.

AB - This investigation examined the effects of slope of the surface of support (35°, 30°, 20°, 10° Facing(Toe) Down, 0° Flat and 10°, 20°, 25° Facing (Toe) Up) and postural orientation on the margins of postural stability in quiet standing of young adults. The findings showed that the center of pressure CoP (displacement, area and length) had least motion at the baseline (0° Flat) platform condition that progressively increased as a function of platform angle in both facing up and down directions. The virtual time to collision (VTC) dynamics revealed that the spatiooral margins to the functional stability boundary were progressively smaller and the VTC time series also more regular (SampEn±Sample Entropy) as slope angle increased. Surface slope induces a restricted stability region with lower dimension VTC dynamics that is more constrained when postural orientation is facing down the slope. These findings provide further evidence that VTC acts as a control variable in standing posture that is influenced by the emergent dynamics of the individual-environment-task interaction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992179941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992179941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0164913

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0164913

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 10

M1 - e0164913

ER -