TY - JOUR
T1 - Potential improvements in shock-mitigation efficacy of a polyurea-augmented advanced combat helmet
AU - Grujicic, A.
AU - Laberge, M.
AU - Grujicic, M.
AU - Pandurangan, B.
AU - Runt, J.
AU - Tarter, J.
AU - Dillon, G.
N1 - Funding Information:
The material presented in this paper is based on work supported by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) research contract entitled ‘‘Elastomeric Polymer-By-Design to Protect the Warfighter Against Traumatic Brain Injury by Diverting the Blast Induced Shock Waves from the Head’’, Contract Number 4036-CU-ONR-1125 as funded through the Pennsylvania State University. The authors are indebted to Dr. Roshdy Barsoum of ONR for continuing support and interest in the present work and to Professors G. Settles and M. Hargather for stimulating discussions and friendship.
PY - 2012/8
Y1 - 2012/8
N2 - The design of the currently used Advanced Combat Helmet (ACH) has been optimized to attain maximum protection against ballistic impacts (fragments, shrapnel, etc.) and hard-surface collisions. However, the ability of the ACH to protect soldiers against blast loading appears not to be as effective. Polyurea, a micro-segregated elastomeric copolymer has shown superior shock-mitigation capabilities. In the present work, a combined Eulerian/Lagrangian transient non-linear dynamics computational fluid/solid interaction analysis is used to investigate potential shock-mitigation benefits which may result from different polyurea-based design augmentations of the ACH. Specific augmentations include replacement of the currently used suspension-pad material with polyurea and the introduction of a thin polyurea internal lining/external coating to the ACH shell. Effectiveness of different ACH designs was quantified by: (a) establishing the main forms of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI); (b) identifying the key mechanical causes for these injuries; and (c) quantifying the extents of reductions in the magnitude of these mechanical causes. The results obtained show that while the ACH with a 2-mm-thick polyurea internal lining displays the best blast mitigation performance, it does not provide sufficient protection against mTBI.
AB - The design of the currently used Advanced Combat Helmet (ACH) has been optimized to attain maximum protection against ballistic impacts (fragments, shrapnel, etc.) and hard-surface collisions. However, the ability of the ACH to protect soldiers against blast loading appears not to be as effective. Polyurea, a micro-segregated elastomeric copolymer has shown superior shock-mitigation capabilities. In the present work, a combined Eulerian/Lagrangian transient non-linear dynamics computational fluid/solid interaction analysis is used to investigate potential shock-mitigation benefits which may result from different polyurea-based design augmentations of the ACH. Specific augmentations include replacement of the currently used suspension-pad material with polyurea and the introduction of a thin polyurea internal lining/external coating to the ACH shell. Effectiveness of different ACH designs was quantified by: (a) establishing the main forms of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI); (b) identifying the key mechanical causes for these injuries; and (c) quantifying the extents of reductions in the magnitude of these mechanical causes. The results obtained show that while the ACH with a 2-mm-thick polyurea internal lining displays the best blast mitigation performance, it does not provide sufficient protection against mTBI.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865223683&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865223683&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11665-011-0065-3
DO - 10.1007/s11665-011-0065-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84865223683
SN - 1059-9495
VL - 21
SP - 1562
EP - 1579
JO - Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
JF - Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
IS - 8
ER -