Practice and Working Memory Effects in Building Procedural Skill

Richard Alan Carlson, Marc A. Sullivan, Walter Schneider

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several theories assume that practice (a) results in restructuring of component processes and (b) reduces demand on working memory. Eight subjects practiced judgments about digital logic gates for over 8,000 trials. At two practice levels, subjects made judgments while retaining short-term memory loads irrelevant to the judgments, relevant but not accessed, or accessed to make the judgments. Four phenomena together provide constraints for theory: First, performance declined in moving from blocked practice to randomized practice. Second, gate and judgment type strongly affected latency. Third, these effects declined but did not disappear with practice. Fourth, the cost of accessing information in working memory remained substantial. These results are interpreted as reflecting a serial process with constant structure, while component processes become faster. The results challenge theories assuming that all learning results from restructuring or that restructuring is an automatic consequence of practice, and they support a distributed view of working memory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)517-526
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1989

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
restructuring
Practice (Psychology)
Procedural
Working Memory
Learning
Costs and Cost Analysis
demand
costs
learning
performance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{8dbd98cab5ec4a06832cc5bc3c07bcc2,
title = "Practice and Working Memory Effects in Building Procedural Skill",
abstract = "Several theories assume that practice (a) results in restructuring of component processes and (b) reduces demand on working memory. Eight subjects practiced judgments about digital logic gates for over 8,000 trials. At two practice levels, subjects made judgments while retaining short-term memory loads irrelevant to the judgments, relevant but not accessed, or accessed to make the judgments. Four phenomena together provide constraints for theory: First, performance declined in moving from blocked practice to randomized practice. Second, gate and judgment type strongly affected latency. Third, these effects declined but did not disappear with practice. Fourth, the cost of accessing information in working memory remained substantial. These results are interpreted as reflecting a serial process with constant structure, while component processes become faster. The results challenge theories assuming that all learning results from restructuring or that restructuring is an automatic consequence of practice, and they support a distributed view of working memory.",
author = "Carlson, {Richard Alan} and Sullivan, {Marc A.} and Walter Schneider",
year = "1989",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0278-7393.15.3.517",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "517--526",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Practice and Working Memory Effects in Building Procedural Skill. / Carlson, Richard Alan; Sullivan, Marc A.; Schneider, Walter.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 15, No. 3, 01.01.1989, p. 517-526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practice and Working Memory Effects in Building Procedural Skill

AU - Carlson, Richard Alan

AU - Sullivan, Marc A.

AU - Schneider, Walter

PY - 1989/1/1

Y1 - 1989/1/1

N2 - Several theories assume that practice (a) results in restructuring of component processes and (b) reduces demand on working memory. Eight subjects practiced judgments about digital logic gates for over 8,000 trials. At two practice levels, subjects made judgments while retaining short-term memory loads irrelevant to the judgments, relevant but not accessed, or accessed to make the judgments. Four phenomena together provide constraints for theory: First, performance declined in moving from blocked practice to randomized practice. Second, gate and judgment type strongly affected latency. Third, these effects declined but did not disappear with practice. Fourth, the cost of accessing information in working memory remained substantial. These results are interpreted as reflecting a serial process with constant structure, while component processes become faster. The results challenge theories assuming that all learning results from restructuring or that restructuring is an automatic consequence of practice, and they support a distributed view of working memory.

AB - Several theories assume that practice (a) results in restructuring of component processes and (b) reduces demand on working memory. Eight subjects practiced judgments about digital logic gates for over 8,000 trials. At two practice levels, subjects made judgments while retaining short-term memory loads irrelevant to the judgments, relevant but not accessed, or accessed to make the judgments. Four phenomena together provide constraints for theory: First, performance declined in moving from blocked practice to randomized practice. Second, gate and judgment type strongly affected latency. Third, these effects declined but did not disappear with practice. Fourth, the cost of accessing information in working memory remained substantial. These results are interpreted as reflecting a serial process with constant structure, while component processes become faster. The results challenge theories assuming that all learning results from restructuring or that restructuring is an automatic consequence of practice, and they support a distributed view of working memory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000556330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000556330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0278-7393.15.3.517

DO - 10.1037/0278-7393.15.3.517

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 517

EP - 526

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 3

ER -