Practice variability promotes an external focus of attention and enhances motor skill learning

Lee Kuen Chua, Maria Katrina Dimapilis, Takehiro Iwatsuki, Reza Abdollahipour, Rebecca Lewthwaite, Gabriele Wulf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Variability in practice has been shown to enhance motor skill learning. Benefits of practice variability have been attributed to motor schema formation (variable versus constant practice), or more effortful information processing (random versus blocked practice). We hypothesized that, among other mechanisms, greater practice variability might promote an external focus of attention on the intended movement effect, while less variability would be more conducive to a less effective internal focus on body movements. In Experiment 1, the learning of a throwing task was enhanced by variable versus constant practice, and variable group participants reported focusing more on the distance to the target (external focus), while constant group participants focused more on their posture (internal focus). In Experiment 2, golf putting was learned more effectively with a random compared with a blocked practice schedule. Furthermore, random group learners reported using a more effective distal external focus (i.e., distance to the target) to a greater extent, whereas blocked group participants used a less effective proximal focus (i.e., putter) more often. While attentional focus was assessed through questionnaires in the first two experiments, learners in Experiment 3 were asked to report their current attentional focus at any time during practice. Again, the learning of a throwing task was more effective after random relative to blocked practice. Also, random practice learners reported using more external focus cues, while in blocked practice participants used more internal focus cues. The findings suggest that the attentional foci induced by different practice schedules might be at least partially responsible for the learning differences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)307-319
Number of pages13
JournalHuman Movement Science
Volume64
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Motor Skills
Learning
Cues
Appointments and Schedules
Practice (Psychology)
Golf
Posture
Automatic Data Processing

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Chua, Lee Kuen ; Dimapilis, Maria Katrina ; Iwatsuki, Takehiro ; Abdollahipour, Reza ; Lewthwaite, Rebecca ; Wulf, Gabriele. / Practice variability promotes an external focus of attention and enhances motor skill learning. In: Human Movement Science. 2019 ; Vol. 64. pp. 307-319.
@article{e5b95e0f60704968b2aabbfcdf4d4b46,
title = "Practice variability promotes an external focus of attention and enhances motor skill learning",
abstract = "Variability in practice has been shown to enhance motor skill learning. Benefits of practice variability have been attributed to motor schema formation (variable versus constant practice), or more effortful information processing (random versus blocked practice). We hypothesized that, among other mechanisms, greater practice variability might promote an external focus of attention on the intended movement effect, while less variability would be more conducive to a less effective internal focus on body movements. In Experiment 1, the learning of a throwing task was enhanced by variable versus constant practice, and variable group participants reported focusing more on the distance to the target (external focus), while constant group participants focused more on their posture (internal focus). In Experiment 2, golf putting was learned more effectively with a random compared with a blocked practice schedule. Furthermore, random group learners reported using a more effective distal external focus (i.e., distance to the target) to a greater extent, whereas blocked group participants used a less effective proximal focus (i.e., putter) more often. While attentional focus was assessed through questionnaires in the first two experiments, learners in Experiment 3 were asked to report their current attentional focus at any time during practice. Again, the learning of a throwing task was more effective after random relative to blocked practice. Also, random practice learners reported using more external focus cues, while in blocked practice participants used more internal focus cues. The findings suggest that the attentional foci induced by different practice schedules might be at least partially responsible for the learning differences.",
author = "Chua, {Lee Kuen} and Dimapilis, {Maria Katrina} and Takehiro Iwatsuki and Reza Abdollahipour and Rebecca Lewthwaite and Gabriele Wulf",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.humov.2019.02.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "307--319",
journal = "Human Movement Science",
issn = "0167-9457",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Practice variability promotes an external focus of attention and enhances motor skill learning. / Chua, Lee Kuen; Dimapilis, Maria Katrina; Iwatsuki, Takehiro; Abdollahipour, Reza; Lewthwaite, Rebecca; Wulf, Gabriele.

In: Human Movement Science, Vol. 64, 01.04.2019, p. 307-319.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practice variability promotes an external focus of attention and enhances motor skill learning

AU - Chua, Lee Kuen

AU - Dimapilis, Maria Katrina

AU - Iwatsuki, Takehiro

AU - Abdollahipour, Reza

AU - Lewthwaite, Rebecca

AU - Wulf, Gabriele

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Variability in practice has been shown to enhance motor skill learning. Benefits of practice variability have been attributed to motor schema formation (variable versus constant practice), or more effortful information processing (random versus blocked practice). We hypothesized that, among other mechanisms, greater practice variability might promote an external focus of attention on the intended movement effect, while less variability would be more conducive to a less effective internal focus on body movements. In Experiment 1, the learning of a throwing task was enhanced by variable versus constant practice, and variable group participants reported focusing more on the distance to the target (external focus), while constant group participants focused more on their posture (internal focus). In Experiment 2, golf putting was learned more effectively with a random compared with a blocked practice schedule. Furthermore, random group learners reported using a more effective distal external focus (i.e., distance to the target) to a greater extent, whereas blocked group participants used a less effective proximal focus (i.e., putter) more often. While attentional focus was assessed through questionnaires in the first two experiments, learners in Experiment 3 were asked to report their current attentional focus at any time during practice. Again, the learning of a throwing task was more effective after random relative to blocked practice. Also, random practice learners reported using more external focus cues, while in blocked practice participants used more internal focus cues. The findings suggest that the attentional foci induced by different practice schedules might be at least partially responsible for the learning differences.

AB - Variability in practice has been shown to enhance motor skill learning. Benefits of practice variability have been attributed to motor schema formation (variable versus constant practice), or more effortful information processing (random versus blocked practice). We hypothesized that, among other mechanisms, greater practice variability might promote an external focus of attention on the intended movement effect, while less variability would be more conducive to a less effective internal focus on body movements. In Experiment 1, the learning of a throwing task was enhanced by variable versus constant practice, and variable group participants reported focusing more on the distance to the target (external focus), while constant group participants focused more on their posture (internal focus). In Experiment 2, golf putting was learned more effectively with a random compared with a blocked practice schedule. Furthermore, random group learners reported using a more effective distal external focus (i.e., distance to the target) to a greater extent, whereas blocked group participants used a less effective proximal focus (i.e., putter) more often. While attentional focus was assessed through questionnaires in the first two experiments, learners in Experiment 3 were asked to report their current attentional focus at any time during practice. Again, the learning of a throwing task was more effective after random relative to blocked practice. Also, random practice learners reported using more external focus cues, while in blocked practice participants used more internal focus cues. The findings suggest that the attentional foci induced by different practice schedules might be at least partially responsible for the learning differences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062179428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062179428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.humov.2019.02.015

DO - 10.1016/j.humov.2019.02.015

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 307

EP - 319

JO - Human Movement Science

JF - Human Movement Science

SN - 0167-9457

ER -