Pre-drilling background groundwater quality in the Deep River Triassic Basin of central North Carolina, USA

Adrian Down, Kathrin Schreglmann, Desiree L. Plata, Martin Elsner, Nathaniel Richard Warner, Avner Vengosh, Katie Moore, Drew Coleman, Robert B. Jackson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Unconventional natural gas development via horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing has greatly increased the supply of natural gas in the United States. However, the practice presents concerns about the possibility for impacts on shallow groundwater aquifers. The Deep River Triassic Basin in central North Carolina is likely to contain natural gas that could be extracted via hydraulic fracturing in the future. Unlike other states where hydraulic fracturing has been employed, North Carolina has no history of commercial oil and gas extraction. In this study, we measured water chemistry, dissolved gases, and volatile organic compounds in 51 private drinking water well samples over the Deep River Triassic Basin. Our data document the background water quality of shallow aquifers in the Deep River Basin, which could provide an important baseline dataset if hydraulic fracturing occurs here in the future. We found only two of the 51 water wells sampled had dissolved CH4 concentrations >0.1mg/L, and no well had a methane concentration >0.5mg/L. The δ13C-CH4 of the two highest CH4 concentration water wells (-69.5% and -61%) suggest a biogenic CH4 source and are distinct from the δ13C-CH4 of two test gas wells drilled in the area (-54.41% and -45.11%). Unlike other basins overlying shale gas formations in the US, we find no evidence for CH4 migration into shallow groundwater in the Triassic basin. In addition, we found only seven VOCs in five water samples, with all levels below the US EPA's maximum contaminant levels. Ion and trace metal concentrations in most samples were also below US EPA primary drinking water standards, with the exception of two samples that exceed the standards for As. We modeled the depth of the upper surface of the Cumnock Shale formation in the Deep River Basin using a kriging algorithm and found that its depth below the surface is shallow (0-~1500m) relative to other shale formations that have been drilled commercially in the US, including the Marcellus in Pennsylvania and the Fayetteville in Arkansas. The relatively shallow shale, combined with the presence of multiple faults and diabase intrusions that characterize the geology of the area, may make the Deep River Triassic Basin more vulnerable to deep fluid connectivity to shallow aquifers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-13
Number of pages11
JournalApplied Geochemistry
Volume60
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Hydraulic fracturing
Catchments
Groundwater
Drilling
Water wells
Triassic
Rivers
drilling
Shale
Aquifers
groundwater
natural gas
Natural gas
shale
basin
river
Gases
aquifer
Volatile organic compounds
Potable water

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Pollution
  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Cite this

Down, Adrian ; Schreglmann, Kathrin ; Plata, Desiree L. ; Elsner, Martin ; Warner, Nathaniel Richard ; Vengosh, Avner ; Moore, Katie ; Coleman, Drew ; Jackson, Robert B. / Pre-drilling background groundwater quality in the Deep River Triassic Basin of central North Carolina, USA. In: Applied Geochemistry. 2015 ; Vol. 60. pp. 3-13.
@article{ca390fc432a1414e93a4221f02367d45,
title = "Pre-drilling background groundwater quality in the Deep River Triassic Basin of central North Carolina, USA",
abstract = "Unconventional natural gas development via horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing has greatly increased the supply of natural gas in the United States. However, the practice presents concerns about the possibility for impacts on shallow groundwater aquifers. The Deep River Triassic Basin in central North Carolina is likely to contain natural gas that could be extracted via hydraulic fracturing in the future. Unlike other states where hydraulic fracturing has been employed, North Carolina has no history of commercial oil and gas extraction. In this study, we measured water chemistry, dissolved gases, and volatile organic compounds in 51 private drinking water well samples over the Deep River Triassic Basin. Our data document the background water quality of shallow aquifers in the Deep River Basin, which could provide an important baseline dataset if hydraulic fracturing occurs here in the future. We found only two of the 51 water wells sampled had dissolved CH4 concentrations >0.1mg/L, and no well had a methane concentration >0.5mg/L. The δ13C-CH4 of the two highest CH4 concentration water wells (-69.5{\%} and -61{\%}) suggest a biogenic CH4 source and are distinct from the δ13C-CH4 of two test gas wells drilled in the area (-54.41{\%} and -45.11{\%}). Unlike other basins overlying shale gas formations in the US, we find no evidence for CH4 migration into shallow groundwater in the Triassic basin. In addition, we found only seven VOCs in five water samples, with all levels below the US EPA's maximum contaminant levels. Ion and trace metal concentrations in most samples were also below US EPA primary drinking water standards, with the exception of two samples that exceed the standards for As. We modeled the depth of the upper surface of the Cumnock Shale formation in the Deep River Basin using a kriging algorithm and found that its depth below the surface is shallow (0-~1500m) relative to other shale formations that have been drilled commercially in the US, including the Marcellus in Pennsylvania and the Fayetteville in Arkansas. The relatively shallow shale, combined with the presence of multiple faults and diabase intrusions that characterize the geology of the area, may make the Deep River Triassic Basin more vulnerable to deep fluid connectivity to shallow aquifers.",
author = "Adrian Down and Kathrin Schreglmann and Plata, {Desiree L.} and Martin Elsner and Warner, {Nathaniel Richard} and Avner Vengosh and Katie Moore and Drew Coleman and Jackson, {Robert B.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.01.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "3--13",
journal = "Applied Geochemistry",
issn = "0883-2927",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Down, A, Schreglmann, K, Plata, DL, Elsner, M, Warner, NR, Vengosh, A, Moore, K, Coleman, D & Jackson, RB 2015, 'Pre-drilling background groundwater quality in the Deep River Triassic Basin of central North Carolina, USA', Applied Geochemistry, vol. 60, pp. 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.01.018

Pre-drilling background groundwater quality in the Deep River Triassic Basin of central North Carolina, USA. / Down, Adrian; Schreglmann, Kathrin; Plata, Desiree L.; Elsner, Martin; Warner, Nathaniel Richard; Vengosh, Avner; Moore, Katie; Coleman, Drew; Jackson, Robert B.

In: Applied Geochemistry, Vol. 60, 01.09.2015, p. 3-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pre-drilling background groundwater quality in the Deep River Triassic Basin of central North Carolina, USA

AU - Down, Adrian

AU - Schreglmann, Kathrin

AU - Plata, Desiree L.

AU - Elsner, Martin

AU - Warner, Nathaniel Richard

AU - Vengosh, Avner

AU - Moore, Katie

AU - Coleman, Drew

AU - Jackson, Robert B.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Unconventional natural gas development via horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing has greatly increased the supply of natural gas in the United States. However, the practice presents concerns about the possibility for impacts on shallow groundwater aquifers. The Deep River Triassic Basin in central North Carolina is likely to contain natural gas that could be extracted via hydraulic fracturing in the future. Unlike other states where hydraulic fracturing has been employed, North Carolina has no history of commercial oil and gas extraction. In this study, we measured water chemistry, dissolved gases, and volatile organic compounds in 51 private drinking water well samples over the Deep River Triassic Basin. Our data document the background water quality of shallow aquifers in the Deep River Basin, which could provide an important baseline dataset if hydraulic fracturing occurs here in the future. We found only two of the 51 water wells sampled had dissolved CH4 concentrations >0.1mg/L, and no well had a methane concentration >0.5mg/L. The δ13C-CH4 of the two highest CH4 concentration water wells (-69.5% and -61%) suggest a biogenic CH4 source and are distinct from the δ13C-CH4 of two test gas wells drilled in the area (-54.41% and -45.11%). Unlike other basins overlying shale gas formations in the US, we find no evidence for CH4 migration into shallow groundwater in the Triassic basin. In addition, we found only seven VOCs in five water samples, with all levels below the US EPA's maximum contaminant levels. Ion and trace metal concentrations in most samples were also below US EPA primary drinking water standards, with the exception of two samples that exceed the standards for As. We modeled the depth of the upper surface of the Cumnock Shale formation in the Deep River Basin using a kriging algorithm and found that its depth below the surface is shallow (0-~1500m) relative to other shale formations that have been drilled commercially in the US, including the Marcellus in Pennsylvania and the Fayetteville in Arkansas. The relatively shallow shale, combined with the presence of multiple faults and diabase intrusions that characterize the geology of the area, may make the Deep River Triassic Basin more vulnerable to deep fluid connectivity to shallow aquifers.

AB - Unconventional natural gas development via horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing has greatly increased the supply of natural gas in the United States. However, the practice presents concerns about the possibility for impacts on shallow groundwater aquifers. The Deep River Triassic Basin in central North Carolina is likely to contain natural gas that could be extracted via hydraulic fracturing in the future. Unlike other states where hydraulic fracturing has been employed, North Carolina has no history of commercial oil and gas extraction. In this study, we measured water chemistry, dissolved gases, and volatile organic compounds in 51 private drinking water well samples over the Deep River Triassic Basin. Our data document the background water quality of shallow aquifers in the Deep River Basin, which could provide an important baseline dataset if hydraulic fracturing occurs here in the future. We found only two of the 51 water wells sampled had dissolved CH4 concentrations >0.1mg/L, and no well had a methane concentration >0.5mg/L. The δ13C-CH4 of the two highest CH4 concentration water wells (-69.5% and -61%) suggest a biogenic CH4 source and are distinct from the δ13C-CH4 of two test gas wells drilled in the area (-54.41% and -45.11%). Unlike other basins overlying shale gas formations in the US, we find no evidence for CH4 migration into shallow groundwater in the Triassic basin. In addition, we found only seven VOCs in five water samples, with all levels below the US EPA's maximum contaminant levels. Ion and trace metal concentrations in most samples were also below US EPA primary drinking water standards, with the exception of two samples that exceed the standards for As. We modeled the depth of the upper surface of the Cumnock Shale formation in the Deep River Basin using a kriging algorithm and found that its depth below the surface is shallow (0-~1500m) relative to other shale formations that have been drilled commercially in the US, including the Marcellus in Pennsylvania and the Fayetteville in Arkansas. The relatively shallow shale, combined with the presence of multiple faults and diabase intrusions that characterize the geology of the area, may make the Deep River Triassic Basin more vulnerable to deep fluid connectivity to shallow aquifers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939417457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939417457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.01.018

DO - 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.01.018

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 3

EP - 13

JO - Applied Geochemistry

JF - Applied Geochemistry

SN - 0883-2927

ER -