Predator-induced maternal stress and population demography in snowshoe hares

The more severe the risk, the longer the generational effect

Michael John Sheriff, E. K. Mcmahon, C. J. Krebs, R. Boonstra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The risk of predation can cause strong antipredator behaviors and marked stress-induced changes in physiology. In mothers, predator-induced stress can reduce reproductive fitness and alter offspring phenotypes. Acting via these generational, maternal stress effects, predation risk may continue to influence the demography of prey populations even when the predators are no longer present. The 10-year snowshoe hare cycle is the classic top-down predator-driven example in nature and is caused both by direct mortality and by indirect risk effects. During the decline phase, virtually, all hares die because they are killed and simultaneously hares exhibit pronounced stress effects caused by high predation risk. However, the rapidity of the decline phase varies among cycles. When the decline is extremely rapid, we expect that the risk experienced by hares is much greater than when the decline is prolonged. The enigma of these cycles is the low phase following the decline, when there is little or no population growth in spite of the absence of predators and ample food. Previously, we have shown that predator-induced maternal stress decreases reproduction and compromises the offspring stress axis. Here, we examine how the severity of predation risk during six separate population declines is related to the length of the subsequent low phase. We show that the more severe the decline, as indicated by the greater rate of loss of hares, the longer the subsequent low phase. These results support the hypothesis that the greater the degree of risk, the longer the generational impact on population demography (the longer the low phase of the hare population). Our findings have broad applicability to conservation and management efforts; even when a stressor (predator, human disturbance) is removed or when exposure may be short term (drought, fire or translocation), the signature of the stressor may be evident over several future generations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)305-310
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Zoology
Volume296
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

demography and population
Lepus americanus
demography
hares
predator
predators
predation risk
predation
population decline
translocation
physiology
effect
phenotype
population growth
fitness
drought
disturbance
mortality
food

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Sheriff, Michael John ; Mcmahon, E. K. ; Krebs, C. J. ; Boonstra, R. / Predator-induced maternal stress and population demography in snowshoe hares : The more severe the risk, the longer the generational effect. In: Journal of Zoology. 2015 ; Vol. 296, No. 4. pp. 305-310.
@article{7794e1c25f9d4b10baf7d877987f0d07,
title = "Predator-induced maternal stress and population demography in snowshoe hares: The more severe the risk, the longer the generational effect",
abstract = "The risk of predation can cause strong antipredator behaviors and marked stress-induced changes in physiology. In mothers, predator-induced stress can reduce reproductive fitness and alter offspring phenotypes. Acting via these generational, maternal stress effects, predation risk may continue to influence the demography of prey populations even when the predators are no longer present. The 10-year snowshoe hare cycle is the classic top-down predator-driven example in nature and is caused both by direct mortality and by indirect risk effects. During the decline phase, virtually, all hares die because they are killed and simultaneously hares exhibit pronounced stress effects caused by high predation risk. However, the rapidity of the decline phase varies among cycles. When the decline is extremely rapid, we expect that the risk experienced by hares is much greater than when the decline is prolonged. The enigma of these cycles is the low phase following the decline, when there is little or no population growth in spite of the absence of predators and ample food. Previously, we have shown that predator-induced maternal stress decreases reproduction and compromises the offspring stress axis. Here, we examine how the severity of predation risk during six separate population declines is related to the length of the subsequent low phase. We show that the more severe the decline, as indicated by the greater rate of loss of hares, the longer the subsequent low phase. These results support the hypothesis that the greater the degree of risk, the longer the generational impact on population demography (the longer the low phase of the hare population). Our findings have broad applicability to conservation and management efforts; even when a stressor (predator, human disturbance) is removed or when exposure may be short term (drought, fire or translocation), the signature of the stressor may be evident over several future generations.",
author = "Sheriff, {Michael John} and Mcmahon, {E. K.} and Krebs, {C. J.} and R. Boonstra",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jzo.12249",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "296",
pages = "305--310",
journal = "Journal of Zoology",
issn = "0952-8369",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Predator-induced maternal stress and population demography in snowshoe hares : The more severe the risk, the longer the generational effect. / Sheriff, Michael John; Mcmahon, E. K.; Krebs, C. J.; Boonstra, R.

In: Journal of Zoology, Vol. 296, No. 4, 01.01.2015, p. 305-310.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predator-induced maternal stress and population demography in snowshoe hares

T2 - The more severe the risk, the longer the generational effect

AU - Sheriff, Michael John

AU - Mcmahon, E. K.

AU - Krebs, C. J.

AU - Boonstra, R.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The risk of predation can cause strong antipredator behaviors and marked stress-induced changes in physiology. In mothers, predator-induced stress can reduce reproductive fitness and alter offspring phenotypes. Acting via these generational, maternal stress effects, predation risk may continue to influence the demography of prey populations even when the predators are no longer present. The 10-year snowshoe hare cycle is the classic top-down predator-driven example in nature and is caused both by direct mortality and by indirect risk effects. During the decline phase, virtually, all hares die because they are killed and simultaneously hares exhibit pronounced stress effects caused by high predation risk. However, the rapidity of the decline phase varies among cycles. When the decline is extremely rapid, we expect that the risk experienced by hares is much greater than when the decline is prolonged. The enigma of these cycles is the low phase following the decline, when there is little or no population growth in spite of the absence of predators and ample food. Previously, we have shown that predator-induced maternal stress decreases reproduction and compromises the offspring stress axis. Here, we examine how the severity of predation risk during six separate population declines is related to the length of the subsequent low phase. We show that the more severe the decline, as indicated by the greater rate of loss of hares, the longer the subsequent low phase. These results support the hypothesis that the greater the degree of risk, the longer the generational impact on population demography (the longer the low phase of the hare population). Our findings have broad applicability to conservation and management efforts; even when a stressor (predator, human disturbance) is removed or when exposure may be short term (drought, fire or translocation), the signature of the stressor may be evident over several future generations.

AB - The risk of predation can cause strong antipredator behaviors and marked stress-induced changes in physiology. In mothers, predator-induced stress can reduce reproductive fitness and alter offspring phenotypes. Acting via these generational, maternal stress effects, predation risk may continue to influence the demography of prey populations even when the predators are no longer present. The 10-year snowshoe hare cycle is the classic top-down predator-driven example in nature and is caused both by direct mortality and by indirect risk effects. During the decline phase, virtually, all hares die because they are killed and simultaneously hares exhibit pronounced stress effects caused by high predation risk. However, the rapidity of the decline phase varies among cycles. When the decline is extremely rapid, we expect that the risk experienced by hares is much greater than when the decline is prolonged. The enigma of these cycles is the low phase following the decline, when there is little or no population growth in spite of the absence of predators and ample food. Previously, we have shown that predator-induced maternal stress decreases reproduction and compromises the offspring stress axis. Here, we examine how the severity of predation risk during six separate population declines is related to the length of the subsequent low phase. We show that the more severe the decline, as indicated by the greater rate of loss of hares, the longer the subsequent low phase. These results support the hypothesis that the greater the degree of risk, the longer the generational impact on population demography (the longer the low phase of the hare population). Our findings have broad applicability to conservation and management efforts; even when a stressor (predator, human disturbance) is removed or when exposure may be short term (drought, fire or translocation), the signature of the stressor may be evident over several future generations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938548600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938548600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jzo.12249

DO - 10.1111/jzo.12249

M3 - Article

VL - 296

SP - 305

EP - 310

JO - Journal of Zoology

JF - Journal of Zoology

SN - 0952-8369

IS - 4

ER -