Predicting deliberative conversation: The impact of discussion networks, media use, and political cognitions

Patricia Moy, John Gastil

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study explores the meaning and origins of deliberative political conversation, characterized by an openness to political conflict, the absence of conversational dominance, clear and reasonable argument, and mutual comprehension. Adapting McLeod, Scheufele, and Moy's (1999) model of democratic engagement, we posit a series of relationships among discussion networks, media use, political cognition, and public participation. Using two divergent samples-one consisting of 149 adult literacy students and another comprising 130 public forum participants-we test the model's utility as a predictor of deliberative conversation. Structural equation modeling indicates that network characteristics had mixed effects. Print media use and interpersonal discussion tended to enhance deliberative conversation, and television news viewing hindered both the reasonableness of one's arguments and the comprehension of others' views. Taken together, these results suggest that the deliberative quality of public talk has a complex relationship with common predictors of other political communication behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)443-460
Number of pages18
JournalPolitical Communication
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2006

Fingerprint

cognition
conversation
comprehension
Television
communication behavior
reasonableness
political communication
print media
political behavior
political conflict
Students
television
Communication
news
literacy
participation
student

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{daffac48d08c456cba822389cd867a42,
title = "Predicting deliberative conversation: The impact of discussion networks, media use, and political cognitions",
abstract = "This study explores the meaning and origins of deliberative political conversation, characterized by an openness to political conflict, the absence of conversational dominance, clear and reasonable argument, and mutual comprehension. Adapting McLeod, Scheufele, and Moy's (1999) model of democratic engagement, we posit a series of relationships among discussion networks, media use, political cognition, and public participation. Using two divergent samples-one consisting of 149 adult literacy students and another comprising 130 public forum participants-we test the model's utility as a predictor of deliberative conversation. Structural equation modeling indicates that network characteristics had mixed effects. Print media use and interpersonal discussion tended to enhance deliberative conversation, and television news viewing hindered both the reasonableness of one's arguments and the comprehension of others' views. Taken together, these results suggest that the deliberative quality of public talk has a complex relationship with common predictors of other political communication behavior.",
author = "Patricia Moy and John Gastil",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10584600600977003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "443--460",
journal = "Political Communication",
issn = "1058-4609",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Predicting deliberative conversation : The impact of discussion networks, media use, and political cognitions. / Moy, Patricia; Gastil, John.

In: Political Communication, Vol. 23, No. 4, 01.12.2006, p. 443-460.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting deliberative conversation

T2 - The impact of discussion networks, media use, and political cognitions

AU - Moy, Patricia

AU - Gastil, John

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - This study explores the meaning and origins of deliberative political conversation, characterized by an openness to political conflict, the absence of conversational dominance, clear and reasonable argument, and mutual comprehension. Adapting McLeod, Scheufele, and Moy's (1999) model of democratic engagement, we posit a series of relationships among discussion networks, media use, political cognition, and public participation. Using two divergent samples-one consisting of 149 adult literacy students and another comprising 130 public forum participants-we test the model's utility as a predictor of deliberative conversation. Structural equation modeling indicates that network characteristics had mixed effects. Print media use and interpersonal discussion tended to enhance deliberative conversation, and television news viewing hindered both the reasonableness of one's arguments and the comprehension of others' views. Taken together, these results suggest that the deliberative quality of public talk has a complex relationship with common predictors of other political communication behavior.

AB - This study explores the meaning and origins of deliberative political conversation, characterized by an openness to political conflict, the absence of conversational dominance, clear and reasonable argument, and mutual comprehension. Adapting McLeod, Scheufele, and Moy's (1999) model of democratic engagement, we posit a series of relationships among discussion networks, media use, political cognition, and public participation. Using two divergent samples-one consisting of 149 adult literacy students and another comprising 130 public forum participants-we test the model's utility as a predictor of deliberative conversation. Structural equation modeling indicates that network characteristics had mixed effects. Print media use and interpersonal discussion tended to enhance deliberative conversation, and television news viewing hindered both the reasonableness of one's arguments and the comprehension of others' views. Taken together, these results suggest that the deliberative quality of public talk has a complex relationship with common predictors of other political communication behavior.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751089580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751089580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10584600600977003

DO - 10.1080/10584600600977003

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:33751089580

VL - 23

SP - 443

EP - 460

JO - Political Communication

JF - Political Communication

SN - 1058-4609

IS - 4

ER -