Predicting river otter latrine sites in Pennsylvania

Thomas J. Swimley, Thomas L. Serfass, Robert P. Brooks, Walter M. Tzilkowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Detecting river otter (Lontra canadensis) presence or estimating abundance relies on harvest records, trapper surveys, track surveys, or latrine surveys. Harvest records and trapper surveys are not an option where otters are protected, and track surveys have limited utility in many areas. Latrine surveys are often useful, but may be labor intensive. We used multivariate analysis techniques to examine habitat characteristics at 131 river otter latrines and 113 randomly chosen (nonlatrine) sites along upper Pine Creek, northcentral Pennsylvania, 1991-1992. Discriminant analysis and logistic regression each identified 6 variables as predictors of otter latrine sites: vertical banks, rock formations, points of land, backwater sloughs, tributary streams, and beaver (Castor canadensis) bank dens, lodges, or ponds. Models were cross-validated with ground surveys and low-altitude aerial photographs (1:1,300) from lower Pine Creek, 1993-1994, and Tionesta Creek, northwestern Pennsylvania, 1993-1994. We developed a pattern recognition (PATREC) model using the 6 variables identified as predictors of river otter latrines. Results were similar for all 3 model types, but differed among the 3 survey areas. All 3 model types showed potential for identifying latrines. Allocation of resources to detect otter presence can be adjusted by varying the cutpoint P(E), that defines a predicted latrine for both the logistic regression and the PATREC models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)836-845
Number of pages10
JournalWildlife Society Bulletin
Volume26
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1998

Fingerprint

Lontra canadensis
river
pattern recognition
logistics
Pinus
Castor canadensis
Castoridae
backwater
resource allocation
discriminant analysis
multivariate analysis
aerial photograph
photographs
tributary
labor
pond
rocks

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology

Cite this

Swimley, T. J., Serfass, T. L., Brooks, R. P., & Tzilkowski, W. M. (1998). Predicting river otter latrine sites in Pennsylvania. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 26(4), 836-845.
Swimley, Thomas J. ; Serfass, Thomas L. ; Brooks, Robert P. ; Tzilkowski, Walter M. / Predicting river otter latrine sites in Pennsylvania. In: Wildlife Society Bulletin. 1998 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 836-845.
@article{7a1ef9b718ed4b4088484e135cdfdf23,
title = "Predicting river otter latrine sites in Pennsylvania",
abstract = "Detecting river otter (Lontra canadensis) presence or estimating abundance relies on harvest records, trapper surveys, track surveys, or latrine surveys. Harvest records and trapper surveys are not an option where otters are protected, and track surveys have limited utility in many areas. Latrine surveys are often useful, but may be labor intensive. We used multivariate analysis techniques to examine habitat characteristics at 131 river otter latrines and 113 randomly chosen (nonlatrine) sites along upper Pine Creek, northcentral Pennsylvania, 1991-1992. Discriminant analysis and logistic regression each identified 6 variables as predictors of otter latrine sites: vertical banks, rock formations, points of land, backwater sloughs, tributary streams, and beaver (Castor canadensis) bank dens, lodges, or ponds. Models were cross-validated with ground surveys and low-altitude aerial photographs (1:1,300) from lower Pine Creek, 1993-1994, and Tionesta Creek, northwestern Pennsylvania, 1993-1994. We developed a pattern recognition (PATREC) model using the 6 variables identified as predictors of river otter latrines. Results were similar for all 3 model types, but differed among the 3 survey areas. All 3 model types showed potential for identifying latrines. Allocation of resources to detect otter presence can be adjusted by varying the cutpoint P(E), that defines a predicted latrine for both the logistic regression and the PATREC models.",
author = "Swimley, {Thomas J.} and Serfass, {Thomas L.} and Brooks, {Robert P.} and Tzilkowski, {Walter M.}",
year = "1998",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "836--845",
journal = "Wildlife Society Bulletin",
issn = "0091-7648",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Swimley, TJ, Serfass, TL, Brooks, RP & Tzilkowski, WM 1998, 'Predicting river otter latrine sites in Pennsylvania', Wildlife Society Bulletin, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 836-845.

Predicting river otter latrine sites in Pennsylvania. / Swimley, Thomas J.; Serfass, Thomas L.; Brooks, Robert P.; Tzilkowski, Walter M.

In: Wildlife Society Bulletin, Vol. 26, No. 4, 12.1998, p. 836-845.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting river otter latrine sites in Pennsylvania

AU - Swimley, Thomas J.

AU - Serfass, Thomas L.

AU - Brooks, Robert P.

AU - Tzilkowski, Walter M.

PY - 1998/12

Y1 - 1998/12

N2 - Detecting river otter (Lontra canadensis) presence or estimating abundance relies on harvest records, trapper surveys, track surveys, or latrine surveys. Harvest records and trapper surveys are not an option where otters are protected, and track surveys have limited utility in many areas. Latrine surveys are often useful, but may be labor intensive. We used multivariate analysis techniques to examine habitat characteristics at 131 river otter latrines and 113 randomly chosen (nonlatrine) sites along upper Pine Creek, northcentral Pennsylvania, 1991-1992. Discriminant analysis and logistic regression each identified 6 variables as predictors of otter latrine sites: vertical banks, rock formations, points of land, backwater sloughs, tributary streams, and beaver (Castor canadensis) bank dens, lodges, or ponds. Models were cross-validated with ground surveys and low-altitude aerial photographs (1:1,300) from lower Pine Creek, 1993-1994, and Tionesta Creek, northwestern Pennsylvania, 1993-1994. We developed a pattern recognition (PATREC) model using the 6 variables identified as predictors of river otter latrines. Results were similar for all 3 model types, but differed among the 3 survey areas. All 3 model types showed potential for identifying latrines. Allocation of resources to detect otter presence can be adjusted by varying the cutpoint P(E), that defines a predicted latrine for both the logistic regression and the PATREC models.

AB - Detecting river otter (Lontra canadensis) presence or estimating abundance relies on harvest records, trapper surveys, track surveys, or latrine surveys. Harvest records and trapper surveys are not an option where otters are protected, and track surveys have limited utility in many areas. Latrine surveys are often useful, but may be labor intensive. We used multivariate analysis techniques to examine habitat characteristics at 131 river otter latrines and 113 randomly chosen (nonlatrine) sites along upper Pine Creek, northcentral Pennsylvania, 1991-1992. Discriminant analysis and logistic regression each identified 6 variables as predictors of otter latrine sites: vertical banks, rock formations, points of land, backwater sloughs, tributary streams, and beaver (Castor canadensis) bank dens, lodges, or ponds. Models were cross-validated with ground surveys and low-altitude aerial photographs (1:1,300) from lower Pine Creek, 1993-1994, and Tionesta Creek, northwestern Pennsylvania, 1993-1994. We developed a pattern recognition (PATREC) model using the 6 variables identified as predictors of river otter latrines. Results were similar for all 3 model types, but differed among the 3 survey areas. All 3 model types showed potential for identifying latrines. Allocation of resources to detect otter presence can be adjusted by varying the cutpoint P(E), that defines a predicted latrine for both the logistic regression and the PATREC models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032927683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032927683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032927683

VL - 26

SP - 836

EP - 845

JO - Wildlife Society Bulletin

JF - Wildlife Society Bulletin

SN - 0091-7648

IS - 4

ER -

Swimley TJ, Serfass TL, Brooks RP, Tzilkowski WM. Predicting river otter latrine sites in Pennsylvania. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 1998 Dec;26(4):836-845.