Preference-based electronic decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening: Results of a randomized controlled trial

Mack Ruffin, Michael D. Fetters, Masahito Jimbo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Despite the burden of colorectal cancer and improved health care outcomes with early detection and treatment, screening rates among eligible adults are low. We previously developed through a series of studies an interactive electronic tool, Colorectal Web, to promote colorectal cancer screening. Method: From May 2002 to December 2003, we conducted a randomized controlled trial of Colorectal Web compared to a standard Web site on colorectal cancer screening in urban, suburban, and rural communities in Michigan with high colorectal cancer burden. Study participants were age 50 years and older, with no previous colorectal cancer screening. Major outcome was screened for colorectal cancer by 24 weeks post-intervention. Results: 174 eligible adults were randomized and participated. Immediately post-intervention, Colorectal Web participants were significantly more likely to have a preferred colorectal cancer screening method, but this difference did not persist at subsequent follow-up. Eighty-nine participants had been screened for colorectal cancer by 24 weeks post-intervention. The probability of being screened for the Colorectal Web intervention study arm compared to the control is OR = 3.23 (2.73-3.50 95% Confidence Interval). Conclusion: Colorectal Web is more effective than a standard colorectal cancer Web site at prompting previously unscreened individuals to choose a preferred colorectal cancer screening test and to be screened for colorectal cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-273
Number of pages7
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2007

Fingerprint

Decision Support Techniques
Early Detection of Cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms
Randomized Controlled Trials
Rural Population
Confidence Intervals
Delivery of Health Care

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{30cd16e4325049da98f7afce3cb309ff,
title = "Preference-based electronic decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening: Results of a randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Objective: Despite the burden of colorectal cancer and improved health care outcomes with early detection and treatment, screening rates among eligible adults are low. We previously developed through a series of studies an interactive electronic tool, Colorectal Web, to promote colorectal cancer screening. Method: From May 2002 to December 2003, we conducted a randomized controlled trial of Colorectal Web compared to a standard Web site on colorectal cancer screening in urban, suburban, and rural communities in Michigan with high colorectal cancer burden. Study participants were age 50 years and older, with no previous colorectal cancer screening. Major outcome was screened for colorectal cancer by 24 weeks post-intervention. Results: 174 eligible adults were randomized and participated. Immediately post-intervention, Colorectal Web participants were significantly more likely to have a preferred colorectal cancer screening method, but this difference did not persist at subsequent follow-up. Eighty-nine participants had been screened for colorectal cancer by 24 weeks post-intervention. The probability of being screened for the Colorectal Web intervention study arm compared to the control is OR = 3.23 (2.73-3.50 95{\%} Confidence Interval). Conclusion: Colorectal Web is more effective than a standard colorectal cancer Web site at prompting previously unscreened individuals to choose a preferred colorectal cancer screening test and to be screened for colorectal cancer.",
author = "Mack Ruffin and Fetters, {Michael D.} and Masahito Jimbo",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "267--273",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Preference-based electronic decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening : Results of a randomized controlled trial. / Ruffin, Mack; Fetters, Michael D.; Jimbo, Masahito.

In: Preventive Medicine, Vol. 45, No. 4, 01.10.2007, p. 267-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preference-based electronic decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening

T2 - Results of a randomized controlled trial

AU - Ruffin, Mack

AU - Fetters, Michael D.

AU - Jimbo, Masahito

PY - 2007/10/1

Y1 - 2007/10/1

N2 - Objective: Despite the burden of colorectal cancer and improved health care outcomes with early detection and treatment, screening rates among eligible adults are low. We previously developed through a series of studies an interactive electronic tool, Colorectal Web, to promote colorectal cancer screening. Method: From May 2002 to December 2003, we conducted a randomized controlled trial of Colorectal Web compared to a standard Web site on colorectal cancer screening in urban, suburban, and rural communities in Michigan with high colorectal cancer burden. Study participants were age 50 years and older, with no previous colorectal cancer screening. Major outcome was screened for colorectal cancer by 24 weeks post-intervention. Results: 174 eligible adults were randomized and participated. Immediately post-intervention, Colorectal Web participants were significantly more likely to have a preferred colorectal cancer screening method, but this difference did not persist at subsequent follow-up. Eighty-nine participants had been screened for colorectal cancer by 24 weeks post-intervention. The probability of being screened for the Colorectal Web intervention study arm compared to the control is OR = 3.23 (2.73-3.50 95% Confidence Interval). Conclusion: Colorectal Web is more effective than a standard colorectal cancer Web site at prompting previously unscreened individuals to choose a preferred colorectal cancer screening test and to be screened for colorectal cancer.

AB - Objective: Despite the burden of colorectal cancer and improved health care outcomes with early detection and treatment, screening rates among eligible adults are low. We previously developed through a series of studies an interactive electronic tool, Colorectal Web, to promote colorectal cancer screening. Method: From May 2002 to December 2003, we conducted a randomized controlled trial of Colorectal Web compared to a standard Web site on colorectal cancer screening in urban, suburban, and rural communities in Michigan with high colorectal cancer burden. Study participants were age 50 years and older, with no previous colorectal cancer screening. Major outcome was screened for colorectal cancer by 24 weeks post-intervention. Results: 174 eligible adults were randomized and participated. Immediately post-intervention, Colorectal Web participants were significantly more likely to have a preferred colorectal cancer screening method, but this difference did not persist at subsequent follow-up. Eighty-nine participants had been screened for colorectal cancer by 24 weeks post-intervention. The probability of being screened for the Colorectal Web intervention study arm compared to the control is OR = 3.23 (2.73-3.50 95% Confidence Interval). Conclusion: Colorectal Web is more effective than a standard colorectal cancer Web site at prompting previously unscreened individuals to choose a preferred colorectal cancer screening test and to be screened for colorectal cancer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35248877152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35248877152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.003

DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 17689600

AN - SCOPUS:35248877152

VL - 45

SP - 267

EP - 273

JO - Preventive Medicine

JF - Preventive Medicine

SN - 0091-7435

IS - 4

ER -