Preference construction, sequential decision making, and trade space exploration

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper develops and explores the interface between two related concepts in design decision making. First, design decision making is a process of simultaneously constructing one's preferences while satisfying them. Second, design using computational models (e.g., simulation-based design and model-based design) is a sequential process that starts with low fidelity models for initial trades and progresses through models of increasing detail. Thus, decision making during design should be treated as a sequential decision process rather than as a single decision problem. This premise is supported by research from the domains of behavioral economics, psychology, judgment and decision making, neuroeconomics, marketing, and engineering design as reviewed herein. The premise is also substantiated by our own experience in conducting trade studies for numerous customers across engineering domains. The paper surveys the pertinent literature, presents supporting case studies and identifies use cases from our experiences, synthesizes a preliminary model of the sequential process, presents ongoing research in this area, and provides suggestions for future efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication39th Design Automation Conference
PublisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers
ISBN (Print)9780791855881
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013
EventASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2013 - Portland, OR, United States
Duration: Aug 4 2013Aug 7 2013

Publication series

NameProceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
Volume3 A

Other

OtherASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2013
CountryUnited States
CityPortland, OR
Period8/4/138/7/13

Fingerprint

Decision making
Decision Making
Model-based Design
Engineering Design
Use Case
Decision problem
Computational Model
Fidelity
Customers
Trade
Design
Model
Economics
Engineering
Marketing
Simulation
Experience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design

Cite this

Miller, S. W., Simpson, T. W., Yukish, M. A., Bennett, L. A., Lego, S. E., & Stump, G. M. (2013). Preference construction, sequential decision making, and trade space exploration. In 39th Design Automation Conference [V03AT03A014] (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference; Vol. 3 A). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2013-13098
Miller, Simon Walter ; Simpson, Timothy William ; Yukish, Michael Andrew ; Bennett, Lorri A. ; Lego, Sara E. ; Stump, Gary Michael. / Preference construction, sequential decision making, and trade space exploration. 39th Design Automation Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2013. (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference).
@inproceedings{617c0102b98d4225bed7a10ace37e4ed,
title = "Preference construction, sequential decision making, and trade space exploration",
abstract = "This paper develops and explores the interface between two related concepts in design decision making. First, design decision making is a process of simultaneously constructing one's preferences while satisfying them. Second, design using computational models (e.g., simulation-based design and model-based design) is a sequential process that starts with low fidelity models for initial trades and progresses through models of increasing detail. Thus, decision making during design should be treated as a sequential decision process rather than as a single decision problem. This premise is supported by research from the domains of behavioral economics, psychology, judgment and decision making, neuroeconomics, marketing, and engineering design as reviewed herein. The premise is also substantiated by our own experience in conducting trade studies for numerous customers across engineering domains. The paper surveys the pertinent literature, presents supporting case studies and identifies use cases from our experiences, synthesizes a preliminary model of the sequential process, presents ongoing research in this area, and provides suggestions for future efforts.",
author = "Miller, {Simon Walter} and Simpson, {Timothy William} and Yukish, {Michael Andrew} and Bennett, {Lorri A.} and Lego, {Sara E.} and Stump, {Gary Michael}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/DETC2013-13098",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780791855881",
series = "Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers",
booktitle = "39th Design Automation Conference",

}

Miller, SW, Simpson, TW, Yukish, MA, Bennett, LA, Lego, SE & Stump, GM 2013, Preference construction, sequential decision making, and trade space exploration. in 39th Design Automation Conference., V03AT03A014, Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, vol. 3 A, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2013, Portland, OR, United States, 8/4/13. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2013-13098

Preference construction, sequential decision making, and trade space exploration. / Miller, Simon Walter; Simpson, Timothy William; Yukish, Michael Andrew; Bennett, Lorri A.; Lego, Sara E.; Stump, Gary Michael.

39th Design Automation Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2013. V03AT03A014 (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference; Vol. 3 A).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Preference construction, sequential decision making, and trade space exploration

AU - Miller, Simon Walter

AU - Simpson, Timothy William

AU - Yukish, Michael Andrew

AU - Bennett, Lorri A.

AU - Lego, Sara E.

AU - Stump, Gary Michael

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - This paper develops and explores the interface between two related concepts in design decision making. First, design decision making is a process of simultaneously constructing one's preferences while satisfying them. Second, design using computational models (e.g., simulation-based design and model-based design) is a sequential process that starts with low fidelity models for initial trades and progresses through models of increasing detail. Thus, decision making during design should be treated as a sequential decision process rather than as a single decision problem. This premise is supported by research from the domains of behavioral economics, psychology, judgment and decision making, neuroeconomics, marketing, and engineering design as reviewed herein. The premise is also substantiated by our own experience in conducting trade studies for numerous customers across engineering domains. The paper surveys the pertinent literature, presents supporting case studies and identifies use cases from our experiences, synthesizes a preliminary model of the sequential process, presents ongoing research in this area, and provides suggestions for future efforts.

AB - This paper develops and explores the interface between two related concepts in design decision making. First, design decision making is a process of simultaneously constructing one's preferences while satisfying them. Second, design using computational models (e.g., simulation-based design and model-based design) is a sequential process that starts with low fidelity models for initial trades and progresses through models of increasing detail. Thus, decision making during design should be treated as a sequential decision process rather than as a single decision problem. This premise is supported by research from the domains of behavioral economics, psychology, judgment and decision making, neuroeconomics, marketing, and engineering design as reviewed herein. The premise is also substantiated by our own experience in conducting trade studies for numerous customers across engineering domains. The paper surveys the pertinent literature, presents supporting case studies and identifies use cases from our experiences, synthesizes a preliminary model of the sequential process, presents ongoing research in this area, and provides suggestions for future efforts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896985552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896985552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/DETC2013-13098

DO - 10.1115/DETC2013-13098

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780791855881

T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

BT - 39th Design Automation Conference

PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers

ER -

Miller SW, Simpson TW, Yukish MA, Bennett LA, Lego SE, Stump GM. Preference construction, sequential decision making, and trade space exploration. In 39th Design Automation Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. 2013. V03AT03A014. (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2013-13098