Preservation or piracy

Diagnosing low-relief, high-elevation surface formation mechanisms

Kelin X. Whipple, Roman Alexander Dibiase, William B. Ouimet, Adam M. Forte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Absent clear lithologic control, the presence of elevated, low-relief topography in upland landscapes has traditionally been interpreted as a signature of relative surface uplift and incision of a paleo-landscape. Such interpretations are commonly supported and quantified using analyses of river longitudinal profiles under the assumption of a static drainage network topology. Drainage networks, however, are not static, and it has been proposed recently that divide migration and drainage capture can lead to the generation of low-relief upland topography that mimics that of incised paleo-landscapes and that might be falsely interpreted as recording surface uplift and/or the onset of accelerated incision. Indeed, the interpretation of the incised southeastern Tibetan Plateau, and thus the associated geodynamic implications, have been called into question. Here we use theory and one- and two-dimensional landscape evolution models to develop a set of morphometric criteria to distinguish these alternative mechanisms of low-relief upland formation. Application to the southeastern Tibetan Plateau illustrates the utility of these metrics and demonstrates that the topography is in no way consistent with the drainage network dynamics mechanism and is fully consistent with incision into an elevated, preexisting low-relief landscape.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-94
Number of pages4
JournalGeology
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

piracy
formation mechanism
drainage network
relief
topography
uplift
plateau
landscape evolution
topology
geodynamics
drainage
river

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geology

Cite this

Whipple, Kelin X. ; Dibiase, Roman Alexander ; Ouimet, William B. ; Forte, Adam M. / Preservation or piracy : Diagnosing low-relief, high-elevation surface formation mechanisms. In: Geology. 2017 ; Vol. 45, No. 1. pp. 91-94.
@article{9e0cc4ebb39a426c855e1f00dc7869f2,
title = "Preservation or piracy: Diagnosing low-relief, high-elevation surface formation mechanisms",
abstract = "Absent clear lithologic control, the presence of elevated, low-relief topography in upland landscapes has traditionally been interpreted as a signature of relative surface uplift and incision of a paleo-landscape. Such interpretations are commonly supported and quantified using analyses of river longitudinal profiles under the assumption of a static drainage network topology. Drainage networks, however, are not static, and it has been proposed recently that divide migration and drainage capture can lead to the generation of low-relief upland topography that mimics that of incised paleo-landscapes and that might be falsely interpreted as recording surface uplift and/or the onset of accelerated incision. Indeed, the interpretation of the incised southeastern Tibetan Plateau, and thus the associated geodynamic implications, have been called into question. Here we use theory and one- and two-dimensional landscape evolution models to develop a set of morphometric criteria to distinguish these alternative mechanisms of low-relief upland formation. Application to the southeastern Tibetan Plateau illustrates the utility of these metrics and demonstrates that the topography is in no way consistent with the drainage network dynamics mechanism and is fully consistent with incision into an elevated, preexisting low-relief landscape.",
author = "Whipple, {Kelin X.} and Dibiase, {Roman Alexander} and Ouimet, {William B.} and Forte, {Adam M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1130/G38490.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "91--94",
journal = "Geology",
issn = "0091-7613",
publisher = "Geological Society of America",
number = "1",

}

Preservation or piracy : Diagnosing low-relief, high-elevation surface formation mechanisms. / Whipple, Kelin X.; Dibiase, Roman Alexander; Ouimet, William B.; Forte, Adam M.

In: Geology, Vol. 45, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 91-94.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preservation or piracy

T2 - Diagnosing low-relief, high-elevation surface formation mechanisms

AU - Whipple, Kelin X.

AU - Dibiase, Roman Alexander

AU - Ouimet, William B.

AU - Forte, Adam M.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Absent clear lithologic control, the presence of elevated, low-relief topography in upland landscapes has traditionally been interpreted as a signature of relative surface uplift and incision of a paleo-landscape. Such interpretations are commonly supported and quantified using analyses of river longitudinal profiles under the assumption of a static drainage network topology. Drainage networks, however, are not static, and it has been proposed recently that divide migration and drainage capture can lead to the generation of low-relief upland topography that mimics that of incised paleo-landscapes and that might be falsely interpreted as recording surface uplift and/or the onset of accelerated incision. Indeed, the interpretation of the incised southeastern Tibetan Plateau, and thus the associated geodynamic implications, have been called into question. Here we use theory and one- and two-dimensional landscape evolution models to develop a set of morphometric criteria to distinguish these alternative mechanisms of low-relief upland formation. Application to the southeastern Tibetan Plateau illustrates the utility of these metrics and demonstrates that the topography is in no way consistent with the drainage network dynamics mechanism and is fully consistent with incision into an elevated, preexisting low-relief landscape.

AB - Absent clear lithologic control, the presence of elevated, low-relief topography in upland landscapes has traditionally been interpreted as a signature of relative surface uplift and incision of a paleo-landscape. Such interpretations are commonly supported and quantified using analyses of river longitudinal profiles under the assumption of a static drainage network topology. Drainage networks, however, are not static, and it has been proposed recently that divide migration and drainage capture can lead to the generation of low-relief upland topography that mimics that of incised paleo-landscapes and that might be falsely interpreted as recording surface uplift and/or the onset of accelerated incision. Indeed, the interpretation of the incised southeastern Tibetan Plateau, and thus the associated geodynamic implications, have been called into question. Here we use theory and one- and two-dimensional landscape evolution models to develop a set of morphometric criteria to distinguish these alternative mechanisms of low-relief upland formation. Application to the southeastern Tibetan Plateau illustrates the utility of these metrics and demonstrates that the topography is in no way consistent with the drainage network dynamics mechanism and is fully consistent with incision into an elevated, preexisting low-relief landscape.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008318929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008318929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1130/G38490.1

DO - 10.1130/G38490.1

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 91

EP - 94

JO - Geology

JF - Geology

SN - 0091-7613

IS - 1

ER -