Presidential coattails and legislative fragmentation

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

130 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Considerable evidence suggests that legislative fragmentation can negatively affect the survival of democratic presidential regimes. While there is a vast literature examining the determinants of legislative fragmentation, one factor that has traditionally been overlooked is the impact of presidential elections. Do presidential elections increase or decrease legislative fragmentation? Does it matter if presidents are elected by plurality rule or by runoff? Using a new dataset that covers all democratic legislative and presidential elections between 1946 and 2000, I find that presidential coattails can reduce, increase, or have no effect on legislative fragmentation depending on the number of presidential candidates. I also find strong evidence that social heterogeneity increases the number of presidential candidates when runoff systems are employed. Taken together, these results suggest that the widespread adoption of runoffs by newly democratic presidential regimes will likely increase legislative fragmentation, thereby putting their democratic survival at increased risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)34-48
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Journal of Political Science
Volume50
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006

Fingerprint

fragmentation
presidential election
candidacy
regime
evidence
president
determinants

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{2ed1b37977b24b059f9c97cb62312bf0,
title = "Presidential coattails and legislative fragmentation",
abstract = "Considerable evidence suggests that legislative fragmentation can negatively affect the survival of democratic presidential regimes. While there is a vast literature examining the determinants of legislative fragmentation, one factor that has traditionally been overlooked is the impact of presidential elections. Do presidential elections increase or decrease legislative fragmentation? Does it matter if presidents are elected by plurality rule or by runoff? Using a new dataset that covers all democratic legislative and presidential elections between 1946 and 2000, I find that presidential coattails can reduce, increase, or have no effect on legislative fragmentation depending on the number of presidential candidates. I also find strong evidence that social heterogeneity increases the number of presidential candidates when runoff systems are employed. Taken together, these results suggest that the widespread adoption of runoffs by newly democratic presidential regimes will likely increase legislative fragmentation, thereby putting their democratic survival at increased risk.",
author = "Golder, {Matthew Richard}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00168.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "34--48",
journal = "American Journal of Political Science",
issn = "0092-5853",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Presidential coattails and legislative fragmentation. / Golder, Matthew Richard.

In: American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 50, No. 1, 01.01.2006, p. 34-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Presidential coattails and legislative fragmentation

AU - Golder, Matthew Richard

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Considerable evidence suggests that legislative fragmentation can negatively affect the survival of democratic presidential regimes. While there is a vast literature examining the determinants of legislative fragmentation, one factor that has traditionally been overlooked is the impact of presidential elections. Do presidential elections increase or decrease legislative fragmentation? Does it matter if presidents are elected by plurality rule or by runoff? Using a new dataset that covers all democratic legislative and presidential elections between 1946 and 2000, I find that presidential coattails can reduce, increase, or have no effect on legislative fragmentation depending on the number of presidential candidates. I also find strong evidence that social heterogeneity increases the number of presidential candidates when runoff systems are employed. Taken together, these results suggest that the widespread adoption of runoffs by newly democratic presidential regimes will likely increase legislative fragmentation, thereby putting their democratic survival at increased risk.

AB - Considerable evidence suggests that legislative fragmentation can negatively affect the survival of democratic presidential regimes. While there is a vast literature examining the determinants of legislative fragmentation, one factor that has traditionally been overlooked is the impact of presidential elections. Do presidential elections increase or decrease legislative fragmentation? Does it matter if presidents are elected by plurality rule or by runoff? Using a new dataset that covers all democratic legislative and presidential elections between 1946 and 2000, I find that presidential coattails can reduce, increase, or have no effect on legislative fragmentation depending on the number of presidential candidates. I also find strong evidence that social heterogeneity increases the number of presidential candidates when runoff systems are employed. Taken together, these results suggest that the widespread adoption of runoffs by newly democratic presidential regimes will likely increase legislative fragmentation, thereby putting their democratic survival at increased risk.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644969195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644969195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00168.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00168.x

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:33644969195

VL - 50

SP - 34

EP - 48

JO - American Journal of Political Science

JF - American Journal of Political Science

SN - 0092-5853

IS - 1

ER -