Presidential disfluency: Literacy, legibility, and vocal political aesthetics in the rhetorical presidency

Samuel McCormick, Mary Stuckey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The presidency was once a carefully scripted and carefully controlled site of speech production. Today's media environment has not lessened efforts at control, but it has rendered these efforts increasingly difficult. Previously disruptive and disfluent ways of speaking now serve a useful role in presidential address, allowing mass-mediated audiences to apprehend the presidency in ways that appear to be more intimate and more authentic than careful scripting allows. In response to this new and fast-evolving rhetorical landscape, this essay develops an analytically, historically, and conceptually wide-ranging argument, inviting rhetorical scholars to supplement their abiding interest in traditional forms of presidential eloquence with a commitment to the study of presidential disfluency. Awkward pauses, verbal hiccups, botched colloquialisms, confessionals, and overly personalized speech-all transgress the norms and expectations of presidential eloquence, allowing scholars to reflect on the longstanding, rhetorical discrepancy between presidential speech as it appears in the official historical record and presidential speech as mass-mediated audiences actually hear it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-22
Number of pages20
JournalReview of Communication
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

aesthetics
literacy
supplement
speaking
commitment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication

Cite this

@article{163fb8ed39d047c2ab170b52a447c7a8,
title = "Presidential disfluency: Literacy, legibility, and vocal political aesthetics in the rhetorical presidency",
abstract = "The presidency was once a carefully scripted and carefully controlled site of speech production. Today's media environment has not lessened efforts at control, but it has rendered these efforts increasingly difficult. Previously disruptive and disfluent ways of speaking now serve a useful role in presidential address, allowing mass-mediated audiences to apprehend the presidency in ways that appear to be more intimate and more authentic than careful scripting allows. In response to this new and fast-evolving rhetorical landscape, this essay develops an analytically, historically, and conceptually wide-ranging argument, inviting rhetorical scholars to supplement their abiding interest in traditional forms of presidential eloquence with a commitment to the study of presidential disfluency. Awkward pauses, verbal hiccups, botched colloquialisms, confessionals, and overly personalized speech-all transgress the norms and expectations of presidential eloquence, allowing scholars to reflect on the longstanding, rhetorical discrepancy between presidential speech as it appears in the official historical record and presidential speech as mass-mediated audiences actually hear it.",
author = "Samuel McCormick and Mary Stuckey",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15358593.2012.760034",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "3--22",
journal = "Review of Communication",
issn = "1535-8593",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Presidential disfluency : Literacy, legibility, and vocal political aesthetics in the rhetorical presidency. / McCormick, Samuel; Stuckey, Mary.

In: Review of Communication, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 3-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Presidential disfluency

T2 - Literacy, legibility, and vocal political aesthetics in the rhetorical presidency

AU - McCormick, Samuel

AU - Stuckey, Mary

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - The presidency was once a carefully scripted and carefully controlled site of speech production. Today's media environment has not lessened efforts at control, but it has rendered these efforts increasingly difficult. Previously disruptive and disfluent ways of speaking now serve a useful role in presidential address, allowing mass-mediated audiences to apprehend the presidency in ways that appear to be more intimate and more authentic than careful scripting allows. In response to this new and fast-evolving rhetorical landscape, this essay develops an analytically, historically, and conceptually wide-ranging argument, inviting rhetorical scholars to supplement their abiding interest in traditional forms of presidential eloquence with a commitment to the study of presidential disfluency. Awkward pauses, verbal hiccups, botched colloquialisms, confessionals, and overly personalized speech-all transgress the norms and expectations of presidential eloquence, allowing scholars to reflect on the longstanding, rhetorical discrepancy between presidential speech as it appears in the official historical record and presidential speech as mass-mediated audiences actually hear it.

AB - The presidency was once a carefully scripted and carefully controlled site of speech production. Today's media environment has not lessened efforts at control, but it has rendered these efforts increasingly difficult. Previously disruptive and disfluent ways of speaking now serve a useful role in presidential address, allowing mass-mediated audiences to apprehend the presidency in ways that appear to be more intimate and more authentic than careful scripting allows. In response to this new and fast-evolving rhetorical landscape, this essay develops an analytically, historically, and conceptually wide-ranging argument, inviting rhetorical scholars to supplement their abiding interest in traditional forms of presidential eloquence with a commitment to the study of presidential disfluency. Awkward pauses, verbal hiccups, botched colloquialisms, confessionals, and overly personalized speech-all transgress the norms and expectations of presidential eloquence, allowing scholars to reflect on the longstanding, rhetorical discrepancy between presidential speech as it appears in the official historical record and presidential speech as mass-mediated audiences actually hear it.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875362202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875362202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15358593.2012.760034

DO - 10.1080/15358593.2012.760034

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84875362202

VL - 13

SP - 3

EP - 22

JO - Review of Communication

JF - Review of Communication

SN - 1535-8593

IS - 1

ER -