Pressure solution for sequential hydraulic tests in low-transmissivity fractured and nonfractured media

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the last decade, considerable effort has been applied to the characterization of low-permeability, heterogeneous formations. A primary reason for the increased activity is the importance of estimating formation properties for use in safety assessments at proposed nuclear waste disposal sites, such as those in Switzerland, Germany, Sweden, and the United States. Methods for determining formation properties (e.g., transmissivity, static head, storativity, and flow boundaries) are varied, but hydraulic testing is commonly used. Hydraulic tests in low-permeability media typically consist of a sequence of multiple test events such as slug, constant pressure, and pulse tests. Each single test event can significantly affect the measured pressure response of subsequent test events. The pressure response can also be affected by borehole mud pressures that occur prior to testing (i.e., pretest pressures) and other factors such as well bore storage, well bore skin, and well bore temperature. We present a new analytical solution that accounts for all of the aforementioned complexities. The solution technique treats a sequence of pretest pressures and multiple test events (slugs, pulses, and shut-ins) as one test sequence, thereby accounting for the influence of one test event upon another. The solution is derived so that only a kernel function, the constant-rate pumping test solution, is required for new flow models. Furthermore, the solution is presented for any flow dimension allowing for interpretation in fractured formations where linear, radial, and fractional flow may exist. We demonstrate the use of the solution by inverse modeling to estimate the flow model and parameters for an example hydraulic test conducted in Switzerland.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)889-895
Number of pages7
JournalWater Resources Research
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

pressure solution
transmissivity
hydraulics
slug
well
test
permeability
waste disposal
radioactive waste
pumping
skin
mud
borehole
safety

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

@article{92ed40e64eb34987bd10fcb76986bddb,
title = "Pressure solution for sequential hydraulic tests in low-transmissivity fractured and nonfractured media",
abstract = "In the last decade, considerable effort has been applied to the characterization of low-permeability, heterogeneous formations. A primary reason for the increased activity is the importance of estimating formation properties for use in safety assessments at proposed nuclear waste disposal sites, such as those in Switzerland, Germany, Sweden, and the United States. Methods for determining formation properties (e.g., transmissivity, static head, storativity, and flow boundaries) are varied, but hydraulic testing is commonly used. Hydraulic tests in low-permeability media typically consist of a sequence of multiple test events such as slug, constant pressure, and pulse tests. Each single test event can significantly affect the measured pressure response of subsequent test events. The pressure response can also be affected by borehole mud pressures that occur prior to testing (i.e., pretest pressures) and other factors such as well bore storage, well bore skin, and well bore temperature. We present a new analytical solution that accounts for all of the aforementioned complexities. The solution technique treats a sequence of pretest pressures and multiple test events (slugs, pulses, and shut-ins) as one test sequence, thereby accounting for the influence of one test event upon another. The solution is derived so that only a kernel function, the constant-rate pumping test solution, is required for new flow models. Furthermore, the solution is presented for any flow dimension allowing for interpretation in fractured formations where linear, radial, and fractional flow may exist. We demonstrate the use of the solution by inverse modeling to estimate the flow model and parameters for an example hydraulic test conducted in Switzerland.",
author = "Johns, {Russell Taylor}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1029/97WR03620",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "889--895",
journal = "Water Resources Research",
issn = "0043-1397",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "4",

}

Pressure solution for sequential hydraulic tests in low-transmissivity fractured and nonfractured media. / Johns, Russell Taylor.

In: Water Resources Research, Vol. 34, No. 4, 01.01.1998, p. 889-895.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pressure solution for sequential hydraulic tests in low-transmissivity fractured and nonfractured media

AU - Johns, Russell Taylor

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - In the last decade, considerable effort has been applied to the characterization of low-permeability, heterogeneous formations. A primary reason for the increased activity is the importance of estimating formation properties for use in safety assessments at proposed nuclear waste disposal sites, such as those in Switzerland, Germany, Sweden, and the United States. Methods for determining formation properties (e.g., transmissivity, static head, storativity, and flow boundaries) are varied, but hydraulic testing is commonly used. Hydraulic tests in low-permeability media typically consist of a sequence of multiple test events such as slug, constant pressure, and pulse tests. Each single test event can significantly affect the measured pressure response of subsequent test events. The pressure response can also be affected by borehole mud pressures that occur prior to testing (i.e., pretest pressures) and other factors such as well bore storage, well bore skin, and well bore temperature. We present a new analytical solution that accounts for all of the aforementioned complexities. The solution technique treats a sequence of pretest pressures and multiple test events (slugs, pulses, and shut-ins) as one test sequence, thereby accounting for the influence of one test event upon another. The solution is derived so that only a kernel function, the constant-rate pumping test solution, is required for new flow models. Furthermore, the solution is presented for any flow dimension allowing for interpretation in fractured formations where linear, radial, and fractional flow may exist. We demonstrate the use of the solution by inverse modeling to estimate the flow model and parameters for an example hydraulic test conducted in Switzerland.

AB - In the last decade, considerable effort has been applied to the characterization of low-permeability, heterogeneous formations. A primary reason for the increased activity is the importance of estimating formation properties for use in safety assessments at proposed nuclear waste disposal sites, such as those in Switzerland, Germany, Sweden, and the United States. Methods for determining formation properties (e.g., transmissivity, static head, storativity, and flow boundaries) are varied, but hydraulic testing is commonly used. Hydraulic tests in low-permeability media typically consist of a sequence of multiple test events such as slug, constant pressure, and pulse tests. Each single test event can significantly affect the measured pressure response of subsequent test events. The pressure response can also be affected by borehole mud pressures that occur prior to testing (i.e., pretest pressures) and other factors such as well bore storage, well bore skin, and well bore temperature. We present a new analytical solution that accounts for all of the aforementioned complexities. The solution technique treats a sequence of pretest pressures and multiple test events (slugs, pulses, and shut-ins) as one test sequence, thereby accounting for the influence of one test event upon another. The solution is derived so that only a kernel function, the constant-rate pumping test solution, is required for new flow models. Furthermore, the solution is presented for any flow dimension allowing for interpretation in fractured formations where linear, radial, and fractional flow may exist. We demonstrate the use of the solution by inverse modeling to estimate the flow model and parameters for an example hydraulic test conducted in Switzerland.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031941105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031941105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/97WR03620

DO - 10.1029/97WR03620

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031941105

VL - 34

SP - 889

EP - 895

JO - Water Resources Research

JF - Water Resources Research

SN - 0043-1397

IS - 4

ER -