Prevalence of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Immigrants

Bilikisu Reni Elewonibi, Rhonda Belue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Immigrants face barriers to accessing conventional health care systems. Hence, they are expected to have comparatively greater use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). This study examines the prevalence of and reason for CAM use in the U.S. population by citizenship status. Data on 34,483 U.S.-born, naturalized, and non-U.S. citizens from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey was used. CAM was categorized into four domains. Analyses controlling for socioeconomic variables were identified patterns of utilization and reasons for use. The prevalence of all CAM domains was lowest among non-U.S. citizens followed by naturalized citizens. The odds of using CAM were also higher for the immigrants who attained citizenship than for non-citizens. Individuals in all groups reported using more CAM for prevention. Factors related to cost, accessibility, or knowledge of CAM use may contribute to lower use of CAM by naturalized and non-U.S. citizens.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)600-607
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Immigrant and Minority Health
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Complementary Therapies
Health Surveys

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Elewonibi, Bilikisu Reni ; Belue, Rhonda. / Prevalence of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Immigrants. In: Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2016 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 600-607.
@article{f0e5668f9c304534982302f33b9950f3,
title = "Prevalence of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Immigrants",
abstract = "Immigrants face barriers to accessing conventional health care systems. Hence, they are expected to have comparatively greater use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). This study examines the prevalence of and reason for CAM use in the U.S. population by citizenship status. Data on 34,483 U.S.-born, naturalized, and non-U.S. citizens from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey was used. CAM was categorized into four domains. Analyses controlling for socioeconomic variables were identified patterns of utilization and reasons for use. The prevalence of all CAM domains was lowest among non-U.S. citizens followed by naturalized citizens. The odds of using CAM were also higher for the immigrants who attained citizenship than for non-citizens. Individuals in all groups reported using more CAM for prevention. Factors related to cost, accessibility, or knowledge of CAM use may contribute to lower use of CAM by naturalized and non-U.S. citizens.",
author = "Elewonibi, {Bilikisu Reni} and Rhonda Belue",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10903-015-0210-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "600--607",
journal = "Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health",
issn = "1557-1912",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

Prevalence of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Immigrants. / Elewonibi, Bilikisu Reni; Belue, Rhonda.

In: Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.06.2016, p. 600-607.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Immigrants

AU - Elewonibi, Bilikisu Reni

AU - Belue, Rhonda

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Immigrants face barriers to accessing conventional health care systems. Hence, they are expected to have comparatively greater use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). This study examines the prevalence of and reason for CAM use in the U.S. population by citizenship status. Data on 34,483 U.S.-born, naturalized, and non-U.S. citizens from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey was used. CAM was categorized into four domains. Analyses controlling for socioeconomic variables were identified patterns of utilization and reasons for use. The prevalence of all CAM domains was lowest among non-U.S. citizens followed by naturalized citizens. The odds of using CAM were also higher for the immigrants who attained citizenship than for non-citizens. Individuals in all groups reported using more CAM for prevention. Factors related to cost, accessibility, or knowledge of CAM use may contribute to lower use of CAM by naturalized and non-U.S. citizens.

AB - Immigrants face barriers to accessing conventional health care systems. Hence, they are expected to have comparatively greater use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). This study examines the prevalence of and reason for CAM use in the U.S. population by citizenship status. Data on 34,483 U.S.-born, naturalized, and non-U.S. citizens from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey was used. CAM was categorized into four domains. Analyses controlling for socioeconomic variables were identified patterns of utilization and reasons for use. The prevalence of all CAM domains was lowest among non-U.S. citizens followed by naturalized citizens. The odds of using CAM were also higher for the immigrants who attained citizenship than for non-citizens. Individuals in all groups reported using more CAM for prevention. Factors related to cost, accessibility, or knowledge of CAM use may contribute to lower use of CAM by naturalized and non-U.S. citizens.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928619984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928619984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10903-015-0210-4

DO - 10.1007/s10903-015-0210-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928619984

VL - 18

SP - 600

EP - 607

JO - Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

JF - Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

SN - 1557-1912

IS - 3

ER -