Prevalence of Errors in Anaphylaxis in Kids (PEAK): A Multicenter Simulation-Based Study

the PEAK investigators of the International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research, & Education (INSPIRE)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Multi-institutional, international practice variation of pediatric anaphylaxis management by health care providers has not been reported. Objective: To characterize variability in epinephrine administration for pediatric anaphylaxis across institutions, including frequency and types of medication errors. Methods: A prospective, observational, study using a standardized in situ simulated anaphylaxis scenario was performed across 28 health care institutions in 6 countries. The on-duty health care team was called for a child (patient simulator) in anaphylaxis. Real medications and supplies were obtained from their actual locations. Demographic data about team members, institutional protocols for anaphylaxis, timing of epinephrine delivery, medication errors, and systems safety issues discovered during the simulation were collected. Results: Thirty-seven in situ simulations were performed. Anaphylaxis guidelines existed in 41% (15 of 37) of institutions. Teams used a cognitive aid for medication dosing 41% (15 of 37) of the time and 32% (12 of 37) for preparation. Epinephrine autoinjectors were not available in 54% (20 of 37) of institutions and were used in only 14% (5 of 37) of simulations. Median time to epinephrine administration was 95 seconds (interquartile range, 77-252) for epinephrine autoinjector and 263 seconds (interquartile range, 146-407.5) for manually prepared epinephrine (P =.12). At least 1 medication error occurred in 68% (25 of 37) of simulations. Nursing experience with epinephrine administration for anaphylaxis was associated with fewer preparation (P =.04) and administration (P =.01) errors. Latent safety threats were reported by 30% (11 of 37) of institutions, and more than half of these (6 of 11) involved a cognitive aid. Conclusions: A multicenter, international study of simulated pediatric anaphylaxis reveals (1) variation in management between institutions in the use of protocols, cognitive aids, and medication formularies, (2) frequent errors involving epinephrine, and (3) latent safety threats related to cognitive aids among multiple sites.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1239-1246.e3
JournalJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Immunology and Allergy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence of Errors in Anaphylaxis in Kids (PEAK): A Multicenter Simulation-Based Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    the PEAK investigators of the International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research, & Education (INSPIRE) (2020). Prevalence of Errors in Anaphylaxis in Kids (PEAK): A Multicenter Simulation-Based Study. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 8(4), 1239-1246.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2019.11.013