Prevention of preterm birth by cervical cerclage compared with expectant management: A systematic review

Anthony O. Odibo, Mohammed Elkousy, Serdar Ural, George A. Macones

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our objective was to review the evidence on the use of cervical cerclage to prevent preterm births compared with expectant management. An OVID, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, and Science Citation Index search using the medical subject headings and terms "cervical cerclage," "cervical incompetence" and "preterm delivery" was conducted for the period 1966 to 2002. We included all randomized trials that evaluated the effectiveness of cervical cerclage in preventing preterm birth. Using a standardized data collection instrument, we reviewed trial designs, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and maternal and neonatal outcome. Fixed or random effects model were used to pool both dichotomous and continuous outcomes where appropriate. Seven trials were identified; six met our inclusion criteria. A total of 2190 women enrolled into the trials were identified with 1110 receiving cerclage and 1080 managed expectantly. There were a total of 278 of 2190 (12.7%) deliveries before 34 weeks of gestation. The meta-analysis demonstrated a trend toward cervical cerclage preventing preterm delivery at less than 34 weeks (OR 0.77, 95% Cl, 0.59, 0.99; P = .049). However, there was no demonstrable improvement in neonatal mortality (OR of 0.0.86, 95% Cl, 0.56, 1.33; P = .50). There is a trend toward cervical cerclage reducing preterm births before 34 weeks. The use of cerclage is, however, associated with an increased risk of postpartum fever.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)130-136
Number of pages7
JournalObstetrical and Gynecological Survey
Volume58
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2003

Fingerprint

Cervical Cerclage
Premature Birth
Medical Subject Headings
Infant Mortality
MEDLINE
Postpartum Period
Meta-Analysis
Fever
Mothers
Databases
Pregnancy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Odibo, Anthony O. ; Elkousy, Mohammed ; Ural, Serdar ; Macones, George A. / Prevention of preterm birth by cervical cerclage compared with expectant management : A systematic review. In: Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey. 2003 ; Vol. 58, No. 2. pp. 130-136.
@article{0492f4f3df9542a6b98c2024ced2bd8c,
title = "Prevention of preterm birth by cervical cerclage compared with expectant management: A systematic review",
abstract = "Our objective was to review the evidence on the use of cervical cerclage to prevent preterm births compared with expectant management. An OVID, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, and Science Citation Index search using the medical subject headings and terms {"}cervical cerclage,{"} {"}cervical incompetence{"} and {"}preterm delivery{"} was conducted for the period 1966 to 2002. We included all randomized trials that evaluated the effectiveness of cervical cerclage in preventing preterm birth. Using a standardized data collection instrument, we reviewed trial designs, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and maternal and neonatal outcome. Fixed or random effects model were used to pool both dichotomous and continuous outcomes where appropriate. Seven trials were identified; six met our inclusion criteria. A total of 2190 women enrolled into the trials were identified with 1110 receiving cerclage and 1080 managed expectantly. There were a total of 278 of 2190 (12.7{\%}) deliveries before 34 weeks of gestation. The meta-analysis demonstrated a trend toward cervical cerclage preventing preterm delivery at less than 34 weeks (OR 0.77, 95{\%} Cl, 0.59, 0.99; P = .049). However, there was no demonstrable improvement in neonatal mortality (OR of 0.0.86, 95{\%} Cl, 0.56, 1.33; P = .50). There is a trend toward cervical cerclage reducing preterm births before 34 weeks. The use of cerclage is, however, associated with an increased risk of postpartum fever.",
author = "Odibo, {Anthony O.} and Mohammed Elkousy and Serdar Ural and Macones, {George A.}",
year = "2003",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.OGX.0000047740.21512.FC",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "130--136",
journal = "Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey",
issn = "0029-7828",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

Prevention of preterm birth by cervical cerclage compared with expectant management : A systematic review. / Odibo, Anthony O.; Elkousy, Mohammed; Ural, Serdar; Macones, George A.

In: Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, Vol. 58, No. 2, 01.02.2003, p. 130-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevention of preterm birth by cervical cerclage compared with expectant management

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Odibo, Anthony O.

AU - Elkousy, Mohammed

AU - Ural, Serdar

AU - Macones, George A.

PY - 2003/2/1

Y1 - 2003/2/1

N2 - Our objective was to review the evidence on the use of cervical cerclage to prevent preterm births compared with expectant management. An OVID, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, and Science Citation Index search using the medical subject headings and terms "cervical cerclage," "cervical incompetence" and "preterm delivery" was conducted for the period 1966 to 2002. We included all randomized trials that evaluated the effectiveness of cervical cerclage in preventing preterm birth. Using a standardized data collection instrument, we reviewed trial designs, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and maternal and neonatal outcome. Fixed or random effects model were used to pool both dichotomous and continuous outcomes where appropriate. Seven trials were identified; six met our inclusion criteria. A total of 2190 women enrolled into the trials were identified with 1110 receiving cerclage and 1080 managed expectantly. There were a total of 278 of 2190 (12.7%) deliveries before 34 weeks of gestation. The meta-analysis demonstrated a trend toward cervical cerclage preventing preterm delivery at less than 34 weeks (OR 0.77, 95% Cl, 0.59, 0.99; P = .049). However, there was no demonstrable improvement in neonatal mortality (OR of 0.0.86, 95% Cl, 0.56, 1.33; P = .50). There is a trend toward cervical cerclage reducing preterm births before 34 weeks. The use of cerclage is, however, associated with an increased risk of postpartum fever.

AB - Our objective was to review the evidence on the use of cervical cerclage to prevent preterm births compared with expectant management. An OVID, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, and Science Citation Index search using the medical subject headings and terms "cervical cerclage," "cervical incompetence" and "preterm delivery" was conducted for the period 1966 to 2002. We included all randomized trials that evaluated the effectiveness of cervical cerclage in preventing preterm birth. Using a standardized data collection instrument, we reviewed trial designs, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and maternal and neonatal outcome. Fixed or random effects model were used to pool both dichotomous and continuous outcomes where appropriate. Seven trials were identified; six met our inclusion criteria. A total of 2190 women enrolled into the trials were identified with 1110 receiving cerclage and 1080 managed expectantly. There were a total of 278 of 2190 (12.7%) deliveries before 34 weeks of gestation. The meta-analysis demonstrated a trend toward cervical cerclage preventing preterm delivery at less than 34 weeks (OR 0.77, 95% Cl, 0.59, 0.99; P = .049). However, there was no demonstrable improvement in neonatal mortality (OR of 0.0.86, 95% Cl, 0.56, 1.33; P = .50). There is a trend toward cervical cerclage reducing preterm births before 34 weeks. The use of cerclage is, however, associated with an increased risk of postpartum fever.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037310403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037310403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.OGX.0000047740.21512.FC

DO - 10.1097/01.OGX.0000047740.21512.FC

M3 - Review article

C2 - 12555045

AN - SCOPUS:0037310403

VL - 58

SP - 130

EP - 136

JO - Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey

JF - Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey

SN - 0029-7828

IS - 2

ER -