TY - JOUR
T1 - Prey perception of predation risk
T2 - volatile chemical cues mediate non-consumptive effects of a predator on a herbivorous insect
AU - Hermann, Sara L.
AU - Thaler, Jennifer S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments We thank Alyssa Cowles, Elizabeth Davidson-Lowe, Stephen Pecylak and Marie Russel for assistance in running experiments and the Cornell Plant-Interactions Group for valuable discussions. We also thank Anurag Agrawal, Jared Ali, Charlie Linn, the Thaler and Poveda laboratories, and Michael Sheriff for comments on the manuscript and Chris Stieha for help with statistics. This project was supported by Hatch grant 139-7406 and NIFA 2014-67013-21785 to J.S.T. The authors have no financial conflicts to declare. All experiments comply with current US laws.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
PY - 2014/10/24
Y1 - 2014/10/24
N2 - Predators can affect prey in two ways—by reducing their density (consumptive effects) or by changing their behavior, physiology or other phenotypic traits (non-consumptive effects). Understanding the cues and sensory modalities prey use to detect predators is critical for predicting the strength of non-consumptive effects and the outcome of predator–prey encounters. While predator-associated cues have been well studied in aquatic systems, less is known about how terrestrial prey, particularly insect larvae, detect their predators. We evaluated how Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, larvae perceive predation risk by isolating cues from its stink bug predator, the spined soldier bug, Podisus maculiventris. When exposed to male “risk” predators that were surgically manipulated so they could hunt but not kill, beetles reduced feeding 29 % compared to controls. Exposure to risk females caused an intermediate response. Beetles ate 24 % less on leaves pre-exposed to predators compared to leaves never exposed to predators, indicating that tactile and visual cues are not required for the prey’s response. Volatile odor cues from predators reduced beetle feeding by 10 % overall, although male predators caused a stronger reduction than females. Finally, visual cues from the predator had a weak effect on beetle feeding. Because multiple cues appear to be involved in prey perception of risk, and because male and female predators have differential effects, beetle larvae likely experience tremendous variation in the information about risk from their local environment.
AB - Predators can affect prey in two ways—by reducing their density (consumptive effects) or by changing their behavior, physiology or other phenotypic traits (non-consumptive effects). Understanding the cues and sensory modalities prey use to detect predators is critical for predicting the strength of non-consumptive effects and the outcome of predator–prey encounters. While predator-associated cues have been well studied in aquatic systems, less is known about how terrestrial prey, particularly insect larvae, detect their predators. We evaluated how Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, larvae perceive predation risk by isolating cues from its stink bug predator, the spined soldier bug, Podisus maculiventris. When exposed to male “risk” predators that were surgically manipulated so they could hunt but not kill, beetles reduced feeding 29 % compared to controls. Exposure to risk females caused an intermediate response. Beetles ate 24 % less on leaves pre-exposed to predators compared to leaves never exposed to predators, indicating that tactile and visual cues are not required for the prey’s response. Volatile odor cues from predators reduced beetle feeding by 10 % overall, although male predators caused a stronger reduction than females. Finally, visual cues from the predator had a weak effect on beetle feeding. Because multiple cues appear to be involved in prey perception of risk, and because male and female predators have differential effects, beetle larvae likely experience tremendous variation in the information about risk from their local environment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919461440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919461440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00442-014-3069-5
DO - 10.1007/s00442-014-3069-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 25234373
AN - SCOPUS:84919461440
SN - 0029-8519
VL - 176
SP - 669
EP - 676
JO - Oecologia
JF - Oecologia
IS - 3
ER -