Pricing effects in Fannie Mae agency bonds

Brent William Ambrose, Arthur Warga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As a government-sponsored enterprise, Fannie Mae enjoys certain advantages over other firms. The extent of these advantages, while widely discussed, have not yet been fully quantified. This paper empirically examines the returns to Fannie Mae general obligation bonds under the assumptions of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory. The model provides an explicit method for estimating the risk premium on Fannie Mae bonds. The results indicate that liquidity and tax effects are important in explaining the returns to Fannie Mae bonds. The results also indicate that the market does not incorporate changes in the riskiness of the mortgage market into the returns on Fannie Mae bonds. The results provide support for the contention that Fannie Mae, as a government sponsored enterprise, enjoys a significant advantage over other firms in the capital market.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)235-249
Number of pages15
JournalThe Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 1995

Fingerprint

pricing
capital market
market
firm
liquidity
premium
taxes
obligation
effect
Pricing
Fannie Mae
method
tax
Government sponsored enterprises

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

@article{174360c93d68470e95bf2349913e5933,
title = "Pricing effects in Fannie Mae agency bonds",
abstract = "As a government-sponsored enterprise, Fannie Mae enjoys certain advantages over other firms. The extent of these advantages, while widely discussed, have not yet been fully quantified. This paper empirically examines the returns to Fannie Mae general obligation bonds under the assumptions of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory. The model provides an explicit method for estimating the risk premium on Fannie Mae bonds. The results indicate that liquidity and tax effects are important in explaining the returns to Fannie Mae bonds. The results also indicate that the market does not incorporate changes in the riskiness of the mortgage market into the returns on Fannie Mae bonds. The results provide support for the contention that Fannie Mae, as a government sponsored enterprise, enjoys a significant advantage over other firms in the capital market.",
author = "Ambrose, {Brent William} and Arthur Warga",
year = "1995",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF01099110",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "235--249",
journal = "Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics",
issn = "0895-5638",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

Pricing effects in Fannie Mae agency bonds. / Ambrose, Brent William; Warga, Arthur.

In: The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 11, No. 3, 01.11.1995, p. 235-249.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pricing effects in Fannie Mae agency bonds

AU - Ambrose, Brent William

AU - Warga, Arthur

PY - 1995/11/1

Y1 - 1995/11/1

N2 - As a government-sponsored enterprise, Fannie Mae enjoys certain advantages over other firms. The extent of these advantages, while widely discussed, have not yet been fully quantified. This paper empirically examines the returns to Fannie Mae general obligation bonds under the assumptions of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory. The model provides an explicit method for estimating the risk premium on Fannie Mae bonds. The results indicate that liquidity and tax effects are important in explaining the returns to Fannie Mae bonds. The results also indicate that the market does not incorporate changes in the riskiness of the mortgage market into the returns on Fannie Mae bonds. The results provide support for the contention that Fannie Mae, as a government sponsored enterprise, enjoys a significant advantage over other firms in the capital market.

AB - As a government-sponsored enterprise, Fannie Mae enjoys certain advantages over other firms. The extent of these advantages, while widely discussed, have not yet been fully quantified. This paper empirically examines the returns to Fannie Mae general obligation bonds under the assumptions of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory. The model provides an explicit method for estimating the risk premium on Fannie Mae bonds. The results indicate that liquidity and tax effects are important in explaining the returns to Fannie Mae bonds. The results also indicate that the market does not incorporate changes in the riskiness of the mortgage market into the returns on Fannie Mae bonds. The results provide support for the contention that Fannie Mae, as a government sponsored enterprise, enjoys a significant advantage over other firms in the capital market.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21844510467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21844510467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01099110

DO - 10.1007/BF01099110

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 235

EP - 249

JO - Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics

JF - Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics

SN - 0895-5638

IS - 3

ER -