Privatization of agricultural extension in New Zealand

Implications for the environment and sustainable agriculture

Marvin H. Hall, S. D. Morriss, D. Kuiper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Government intervention has been an integral part of agricultural policy in most industrialized countries throughout the last half of the twentieth century. Unfortunately, many of the agricultural problems (e.g., market instability, low returns on capital, falling farm incomes, farm failures) that government interventions were intended to correct are still problems today. The combined effects of these policy failures of the past and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) are stimulating countries around the world to begin dismantling their agricultural intervention programs. Movement toward more market economies also frequently includes eliminating or reducing governmental educational and incentive programs including those designed to encourage the adoption of sustainable environmental practices by farmers. Our objectives, therefore, are to explore the potential environmental consequences of dismantling governmental agricultural intervention in extension by taking a close look at New Zealand's experiences. At the time New Zealand began restructuring its agricultural assistance programs, education and extension programs concerned with environmental management on farms, were few and in their infancy. Consequently, it is difficult to assess the effect, if any, that commercialization of New Zealand's extension service had on environmental programming, or for that matter the environment. More recently, environmental-educational programs are being conducted via new and alternative vehicles. These have included government contracts with private farm consultants. In addition, early indications were that environmentally unsustainable activities, e.g., development of environmentally sensitive land for pastoral farming, has declined due largely to the removal of subsidies which encouraged these practices. However, in some other cases, on-farm activities that have the potential to adversely affect the environment have begun to increase again. This time, however, it is in response to market rather than subsidies signals. Not all experiences from the New Zealand situation are applicable to other countries contemplating or initiating reductions in government intervention into agriculture. However, several experiences from the current privatization initiatives provide insight into making the transition with less threat to the environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-71
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Sustainable Agriculture
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2 1999

Fingerprint

privatization
agricultural extension
Privatization
alternative agriculture
sustainable agriculture
Agriculture
Farms
New Zealand
farm
agriculture
farms
subsidies
education programs
dismantling
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
subsidy
markets
market economy
extension programs
consultants

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Development
  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

@article{2e8861df96fd4e9b8ecfe3d049ff80c8,
title = "Privatization of agricultural extension in New Zealand: Implications for the environment and sustainable agriculture",
abstract = "Government intervention has been an integral part of agricultural policy in most industrialized countries throughout the last half of the twentieth century. Unfortunately, many of the agricultural problems (e.g., market instability, low returns on capital, falling farm incomes, farm failures) that government interventions were intended to correct are still problems today. The combined effects of these policy failures of the past and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) are stimulating countries around the world to begin dismantling their agricultural intervention programs. Movement toward more market economies also frequently includes eliminating or reducing governmental educational and incentive programs including those designed to encourage the adoption of sustainable environmental practices by farmers. Our objectives, therefore, are to explore the potential environmental consequences of dismantling governmental agricultural intervention in extension by taking a close look at New Zealand's experiences. At the time New Zealand began restructuring its agricultural assistance programs, education and extension programs concerned with environmental management on farms, were few and in their infancy. Consequently, it is difficult to assess the effect, if any, that commercialization of New Zealand's extension service had on environmental programming, or for that matter the environment. More recently, environmental-educational programs are being conducted via new and alternative vehicles. These have included government contracts with private farm consultants. In addition, early indications were that environmentally unsustainable activities, e.g., development of environmentally sensitive land for pastoral farming, has declined due largely to the removal of subsidies which encouraged these practices. However, in some other cases, on-farm activities that have the potential to adversely affect the environment have begun to increase again. This time, however, it is in response to market rather than subsidies signals. Not all experiences from the New Zealand situation are applicable to other countries contemplating or initiating reductions in government intervention into agriculture. However, several experiences from the current privatization initiatives provide insight into making the transition with less threat to the environment.",
author = "Hall, {Marvin H.} and Morriss, {S. D.} and D. Kuiper",
year = "1999",
month = "7",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1300/J064v14n01_06",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "59--71",
journal = "Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems",
issn = "2168-3565",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Privatization of agricultural extension in New Zealand : Implications for the environment and sustainable agriculture. / Hall, Marvin H.; Morriss, S. D.; Kuiper, D.

In: Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, Vol. 14, No. 1, 02.07.1999, p. 59-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Privatization of agricultural extension in New Zealand

T2 - Implications for the environment and sustainable agriculture

AU - Hall, Marvin H.

AU - Morriss, S. D.

AU - Kuiper, D.

PY - 1999/7/2

Y1 - 1999/7/2

N2 - Government intervention has been an integral part of agricultural policy in most industrialized countries throughout the last half of the twentieth century. Unfortunately, many of the agricultural problems (e.g., market instability, low returns on capital, falling farm incomes, farm failures) that government interventions were intended to correct are still problems today. The combined effects of these policy failures of the past and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) are stimulating countries around the world to begin dismantling their agricultural intervention programs. Movement toward more market economies also frequently includes eliminating or reducing governmental educational and incentive programs including those designed to encourage the adoption of sustainable environmental practices by farmers. Our objectives, therefore, are to explore the potential environmental consequences of dismantling governmental agricultural intervention in extension by taking a close look at New Zealand's experiences. At the time New Zealand began restructuring its agricultural assistance programs, education and extension programs concerned with environmental management on farms, were few and in their infancy. Consequently, it is difficult to assess the effect, if any, that commercialization of New Zealand's extension service had on environmental programming, or for that matter the environment. More recently, environmental-educational programs are being conducted via new and alternative vehicles. These have included government contracts with private farm consultants. In addition, early indications were that environmentally unsustainable activities, e.g., development of environmentally sensitive land for pastoral farming, has declined due largely to the removal of subsidies which encouraged these practices. However, in some other cases, on-farm activities that have the potential to adversely affect the environment have begun to increase again. This time, however, it is in response to market rather than subsidies signals. Not all experiences from the New Zealand situation are applicable to other countries contemplating or initiating reductions in government intervention into agriculture. However, several experiences from the current privatization initiatives provide insight into making the transition with less threat to the environment.

AB - Government intervention has been an integral part of agricultural policy in most industrialized countries throughout the last half of the twentieth century. Unfortunately, many of the agricultural problems (e.g., market instability, low returns on capital, falling farm incomes, farm failures) that government interventions were intended to correct are still problems today. The combined effects of these policy failures of the past and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) are stimulating countries around the world to begin dismantling their agricultural intervention programs. Movement toward more market economies also frequently includes eliminating or reducing governmental educational and incentive programs including those designed to encourage the adoption of sustainable environmental practices by farmers. Our objectives, therefore, are to explore the potential environmental consequences of dismantling governmental agricultural intervention in extension by taking a close look at New Zealand's experiences. At the time New Zealand began restructuring its agricultural assistance programs, education and extension programs concerned with environmental management on farms, were few and in their infancy. Consequently, it is difficult to assess the effect, if any, that commercialization of New Zealand's extension service had on environmental programming, or for that matter the environment. More recently, environmental-educational programs are being conducted via new and alternative vehicles. These have included government contracts with private farm consultants. In addition, early indications were that environmentally unsustainable activities, e.g., development of environmentally sensitive land for pastoral farming, has declined due largely to the removal of subsidies which encouraged these practices. However, in some other cases, on-farm activities that have the potential to adversely affect the environment have begun to increase again. This time, however, it is in response to market rather than subsidies signals. Not all experiences from the New Zealand situation are applicable to other countries contemplating or initiating reductions in government intervention into agriculture. However, several experiences from the current privatization initiatives provide insight into making the transition with less threat to the environment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032836784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032836784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J064v14n01_06

DO - 10.1300/J064v14n01_06

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 59

EP - 71

JO - Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems

JF - Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems

SN - 2168-3565

IS - 1

ER -