Pro-poor? Inclusion and exclusion in native potato value chains in the central highlands of Peru

Daniel Tobin, Leland Luther Glenna, Andre Devaux

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Including smallholding farmers in high value markets has emerged as a pro-poor development strategy. Through a case study of a project that intended to incorporate native potato growers in the central Peruvian highlands into corporate potato chip value chains, this study investigates social differentiation among participants and nonparticipants, as well as reasons for households' inclusion or exclusion. Household surveys and semi-structured interviews in one of the communities where the project was implemented provided the data. Results suggest that value chain participants generally have higher economic status and actively exclude lower-resource households in the community. However, non-participation is not necessarily viewed negatively by all non-participating households. Some deliberately choose not to participate to pursue other livelihood strategies or because of risks involved in participating. These findings indicate that participation in value chains is not necessarily beneficial. For such programs to have broad social benefits, policies and other institutional arrangements are needed to minimize risks of participation in such value chains and to provide support for other market outlets.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)71-80
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Rural Studies
Volume46
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

value chain
Peru
potato
exclusion
inclusion
market
household survey
development strategy
social differentiation
participation
social benefits
livelihood
community
farmer
resource
economics
household
interview
resources
project

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{3c6cdde816f2415ea2e5086e75a0cccf,
title = "Pro-poor? Inclusion and exclusion in native potato value chains in the central highlands of Peru",
abstract = "Including smallholding farmers in high value markets has emerged as a pro-poor development strategy. Through a case study of a project that intended to incorporate native potato growers in the central Peruvian highlands into corporate potato chip value chains, this study investigates social differentiation among participants and nonparticipants, as well as reasons for households' inclusion or exclusion. Household surveys and semi-structured interviews in one of the communities where the project was implemented provided the data. Results suggest that value chain participants generally have higher economic status and actively exclude lower-resource households in the community. However, non-participation is not necessarily viewed negatively by all non-participating households. Some deliberately choose not to participate to pursue other livelihood strategies or because of risks involved in participating. These findings indicate that participation in value chains is not necessarily beneficial. For such programs to have broad social benefits, policies and other institutional arrangements are needed to minimize risks of participation in such value chains and to provide support for other market outlets.",
author = "Daniel Tobin and Glenna, {Leland Luther} and Andre Devaux",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "71--80",
journal = "Journal of Rural Studies",
issn = "0743-0167",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Pro-poor? Inclusion and exclusion in native potato value chains in the central highlands of Peru. / Tobin, Daniel; Glenna, Leland Luther; Devaux, Andre.

In: Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 46, 01.08.2016, p. 71-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pro-poor? Inclusion and exclusion in native potato value chains in the central highlands of Peru

AU - Tobin, Daniel

AU - Glenna, Leland Luther

AU - Devaux, Andre

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Including smallholding farmers in high value markets has emerged as a pro-poor development strategy. Through a case study of a project that intended to incorporate native potato growers in the central Peruvian highlands into corporate potato chip value chains, this study investigates social differentiation among participants and nonparticipants, as well as reasons for households' inclusion or exclusion. Household surveys and semi-structured interviews in one of the communities where the project was implemented provided the data. Results suggest that value chain participants generally have higher economic status and actively exclude lower-resource households in the community. However, non-participation is not necessarily viewed negatively by all non-participating households. Some deliberately choose not to participate to pursue other livelihood strategies or because of risks involved in participating. These findings indicate that participation in value chains is not necessarily beneficial. For such programs to have broad social benefits, policies and other institutional arrangements are needed to minimize risks of participation in such value chains and to provide support for other market outlets.

AB - Including smallholding farmers in high value markets has emerged as a pro-poor development strategy. Through a case study of a project that intended to incorporate native potato growers in the central Peruvian highlands into corporate potato chip value chains, this study investigates social differentiation among participants and nonparticipants, as well as reasons for households' inclusion or exclusion. Household surveys and semi-structured interviews in one of the communities where the project was implemented provided the data. Results suggest that value chain participants generally have higher economic status and actively exclude lower-resource households in the community. However, non-participation is not necessarily viewed negatively by all non-participating households. Some deliberately choose not to participate to pursue other livelihood strategies or because of risks involved in participating. These findings indicate that participation in value chains is not necessarily beneficial. For such programs to have broad social benefits, policies and other institutional arrangements are needed to minimize risks of participation in such value chains and to provide support for other market outlets.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973441037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973441037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.002

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 71

EP - 80

JO - Journal of Rural Studies

JF - Journal of Rural Studies

SN - 0743-0167

ER -