Probability and punishment: How to improve sentencing by taking account of probability

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The United States Sentencing Guidelines place little emphasis on probability. Instead, the Guidelines recommend a sentence in each case based only on whether certain facts about the offender's crime exceed a "threshold" level of likelihood. Guidelines sentences therefore fail to reflect the precise odds of each defendant's wrongdoing, which makes them both inefficient and unfair. This model of decision making is particularly problematic in drug sentencing, where judges often impose lengthy sentences based on drug quantity calculations that carry a high risk of error. To address these problems, district courts should exercise their discretion, and policymakers should implement reforms that incorporate probability into punishment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)214-272
Number of pages59
JournalNew Criminal Law Review
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Probability and punishment: How to improve sentencing by taking account of probability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this