Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text

Stephen Lehman, Gregory Schraw, Matthew McCrudden, Kendall Hartley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined how seductive details affect on-line processing of a technical, scientific text. In Experiment 1, each sentence from the experimental text was rated for interest and importance. Participants rated seductive details as being more interesting but less important than main ideas. In Experiment 2, we examined the effect of seductive details on reading time and learning. Seductive details reduced the amount of time readers spent reading base text sentences, and hindered recall of important ideas and deeper processing as measured by an essay task. These findings extend previous research [Harp, S. & Mayer, R. E. (1997). Role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: on the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 92-102; Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: a theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 441-434.] to suggest that the negative effects of seductive details' on comprehension were due to a combination of reduced attentional allocation and disruption of text coherence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)569-587
Number of pages19
JournalContemporary Educational Psychology
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2007

Fingerprint

Educational Psychology
Learning
cognitive interest
Reading
educational psychology
learning
experiment
Research
comprehension
damages
science
time

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Lehman, Stephen ; Schraw, Gregory ; McCrudden, Matthew ; Hartley, Kendall. / Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text. In: Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2007 ; Vol. 32, No. 4. pp. 569-587.
@article{3a95b33d672c41128da44b372e4c0f62,
title = "Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text",
abstract = "This study examined how seductive details affect on-line processing of a technical, scientific text. In Experiment 1, each sentence from the experimental text was rated for interest and importance. Participants rated seductive details as being more interesting but less important than main ideas. In Experiment 2, we examined the effect of seductive details on reading time and learning. Seductive details reduced the amount of time readers spent reading base text sentences, and hindered recall of important ideas and deeper processing as measured by an essay task. These findings extend previous research [Harp, S. & Mayer, R. E. (1997). Role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: on the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 92-102; Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: a theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 441-434.] to suggest that the negative effects of seductive details' on comprehension were due to a combination of reduced attentional allocation and disruption of text coherence.",
author = "Stephen Lehman and Gregory Schraw and Matthew McCrudden and Kendall Hartley",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.07.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "569--587",
journal = "Contemporary Educational Psychology",
issn = "0361-476X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text. / Lehman, Stephen; Schraw, Gregory; McCrudden, Matthew; Hartley, Kendall.

In: Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 4, 01.10.2007, p. 569-587.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text

AU - Lehman, Stephen

AU - Schraw, Gregory

AU - McCrudden, Matthew

AU - Hartley, Kendall

PY - 2007/10/1

Y1 - 2007/10/1

N2 - This study examined how seductive details affect on-line processing of a technical, scientific text. In Experiment 1, each sentence from the experimental text was rated for interest and importance. Participants rated seductive details as being more interesting but less important than main ideas. In Experiment 2, we examined the effect of seductive details on reading time and learning. Seductive details reduced the amount of time readers spent reading base text sentences, and hindered recall of important ideas and deeper processing as measured by an essay task. These findings extend previous research [Harp, S. & Mayer, R. E. (1997). Role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: on the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 92-102; Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: a theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 441-434.] to suggest that the negative effects of seductive details' on comprehension were due to a combination of reduced attentional allocation and disruption of text coherence.

AB - This study examined how seductive details affect on-line processing of a technical, scientific text. In Experiment 1, each sentence from the experimental text was rated for interest and importance. Participants rated seductive details as being more interesting but less important than main ideas. In Experiment 2, we examined the effect of seductive details on reading time and learning. Seductive details reduced the amount of time readers spent reading base text sentences, and hindered recall of important ideas and deeper processing as measured by an essay task. These findings extend previous research [Harp, S. & Mayer, R. E. (1997). Role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: on the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 92-102; Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: a theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 441-434.] to suggest that the negative effects of seductive details' on comprehension were due to a combination of reduced attentional allocation and disruption of text coherence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34748817434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34748817434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.07.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34748817434

VL - 32

SP - 569

EP - 587

JO - Contemporary Educational Psychology

JF - Contemporary Educational Psychology

SN - 0361-476X

IS - 4

ER -