Production and hedging decisions under regret aversion

Xu Guo, Wing Keung Wong, Qunfang Xu, Xuehu Zhu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate regret-averse firms' production and hedging behaviors. We first show that the separation theorem is still alive under regret aversion by proving that regret aversion is independent of the level of optimal production. On the other hand, we find that the full-hedging theorem does not always hold under regret aversion as the regret-averse firms take hedged positions different from those of risk-averse firms in some situations. With more regret aversion, regret-averse firms will hold smaller optimal hedging positions in an unbiased futures market. Furthermore, contrary to the conventional expectations, we show that banning firms from forward trading affects their production level in both directions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)153-158
Number of pages6
JournalEconomic Modelling
Volume51
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Hedging
Risk-averse
Separation theorem
Futures markets

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Guo, Xu ; Wong, Wing Keung ; Xu, Qunfang ; Zhu, Xuehu. / Production and hedging decisions under regret aversion. In: Economic Modelling. 2015 ; Vol. 51. pp. 153-158.
@article{e1aafc9f99b54ae9a5c15ed0fad33443,
title = "Production and hedging decisions under regret aversion",
abstract = "In this paper, we investigate regret-averse firms' production and hedging behaviors. We first show that the separation theorem is still alive under regret aversion by proving that regret aversion is independent of the level of optimal production. On the other hand, we find that the full-hedging theorem does not always hold under regret aversion as the regret-averse firms take hedged positions different from those of risk-averse firms in some situations. With more regret aversion, regret-averse firms will hold smaller optimal hedging positions in an unbiased futures market. Furthermore, contrary to the conventional expectations, we show that banning firms from forward trading affects their production level in both directions.",
author = "Xu Guo and Wong, {Wing Keung} and Qunfang Xu and Xuehu Zhu",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.econmod.2015.08.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "153--158",
journal = "Economic Modelling",
issn = "0264-9993",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Production and hedging decisions under regret aversion. / Guo, Xu; Wong, Wing Keung; Xu, Qunfang; Zhu, Xuehu.

In: Economic Modelling, Vol. 51, 01.12.2015, p. 153-158.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Production and hedging decisions under regret aversion

AU - Guo, Xu

AU - Wong, Wing Keung

AU - Xu, Qunfang

AU - Zhu, Xuehu

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - In this paper, we investigate regret-averse firms' production and hedging behaviors. We first show that the separation theorem is still alive under regret aversion by proving that regret aversion is independent of the level of optimal production. On the other hand, we find that the full-hedging theorem does not always hold under regret aversion as the regret-averse firms take hedged positions different from those of risk-averse firms in some situations. With more regret aversion, regret-averse firms will hold smaller optimal hedging positions in an unbiased futures market. Furthermore, contrary to the conventional expectations, we show that banning firms from forward trading affects their production level in both directions.

AB - In this paper, we investigate regret-averse firms' production and hedging behaviors. We first show that the separation theorem is still alive under regret aversion by proving that regret aversion is independent of the level of optimal production. On the other hand, we find that the full-hedging theorem does not always hold under regret aversion as the regret-averse firms take hedged positions different from those of risk-averse firms in some situations. With more regret aversion, regret-averse firms will hold smaller optimal hedging positions in an unbiased futures market. Furthermore, contrary to the conventional expectations, we show that banning firms from forward trading affects their production level in both directions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940039312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940039312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.08.007

DO - 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.08.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84940039312

VL - 51

SP - 153

EP - 158

JO - Economic Modelling

JF - Economic Modelling

SN - 0264-9993

ER -