Production technologies in Ethiopian agriculture

Asmerom Kidane, David G. Abler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the characteristics of and choice among two production technologies in Ethiopian agriculture, one with fertilizer and the other without, using 1989-90 farm-level data. For northwest and central Ethiopia, fertilizer usage determinants are estimated simultaneously with technology-specific production functions. For southern Ethiopia, where fertilizer is rarely used, a single production function is estimated. Three conclusions emerge. First, fertilizer use is not significantly affected by a farm's stocks of capital or land. This is consistent with the fact that fertilizer allocation decisions under the deposed Mengistu regime were politicized to the point where farmers had little control over use. Second, fertilizer is associated with a smaller factor share for cattle and a larger share for land, meaning that those who control land may gain relative to the individual farmers who own cattle as the country develops agriculturally. Third, farms without fertilizer in northwest and central Ethiopia tend to be too small, a problem due to population pressures on the land and communal methods of land allocation. This suggests that land allocation institutions should adjust by distributing land to a smaller but more economically viable number of farmers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-191
Number of pages13
JournalAgricultural Economics
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1994

Fingerprint

production technology
fertilizer
fertilizers
agriculture
Ethiopia
production functions
farm
farmers
farms
cattle
population pressure
land
Agriculture
Production technology
Fertilizer
allocation
Farmers
Farm
Cattle
Production function

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Kidane, Asmerom ; Abler, David G. / Production technologies in Ethiopian agriculture. In: Agricultural Economics. 1994 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 179-191.
@article{6fa4fb2264284b5f8e699ad4da8142be,
title = "Production technologies in Ethiopian agriculture",
abstract = "This article examines the characteristics of and choice among two production technologies in Ethiopian agriculture, one with fertilizer and the other without, using 1989-90 farm-level data. For northwest and central Ethiopia, fertilizer usage determinants are estimated simultaneously with technology-specific production functions. For southern Ethiopia, where fertilizer is rarely used, a single production function is estimated. Three conclusions emerge. First, fertilizer use is not significantly affected by a farm's stocks of capital or land. This is consistent with the fact that fertilizer allocation decisions under the deposed Mengistu regime were politicized to the point where farmers had little control over use. Second, fertilizer is associated with a smaller factor share for cattle and a larger share for land, meaning that those who control land may gain relative to the individual farmers who own cattle as the country develops agriculturally. Third, farms without fertilizer in northwest and central Ethiopia tend to be too small, a problem due to population pressures on the land and communal methods of land allocation. This suggests that land allocation institutions should adjust by distributing land to a smaller but more economically viable number of farmers.",
author = "Asmerom Kidane and Abler, {David G.}",
year = "1994",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/0169-5150(94)90006-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "179--191",
journal = "Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom)",
issn = "0169-5150",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Production technologies in Ethiopian agriculture. / Kidane, Asmerom; Abler, David G.

In: Agricultural Economics, Vol. 10, No. 2, 04.1994, p. 179-191.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Production technologies in Ethiopian agriculture

AU - Kidane, Asmerom

AU - Abler, David G.

PY - 1994/4

Y1 - 1994/4

N2 - This article examines the characteristics of and choice among two production technologies in Ethiopian agriculture, one with fertilizer and the other without, using 1989-90 farm-level data. For northwest and central Ethiopia, fertilizer usage determinants are estimated simultaneously with technology-specific production functions. For southern Ethiopia, where fertilizer is rarely used, a single production function is estimated. Three conclusions emerge. First, fertilizer use is not significantly affected by a farm's stocks of capital or land. This is consistent with the fact that fertilizer allocation decisions under the deposed Mengistu regime were politicized to the point where farmers had little control over use. Second, fertilizer is associated with a smaller factor share for cattle and a larger share for land, meaning that those who control land may gain relative to the individual farmers who own cattle as the country develops agriculturally. Third, farms without fertilizer in northwest and central Ethiopia tend to be too small, a problem due to population pressures on the land and communal methods of land allocation. This suggests that land allocation institutions should adjust by distributing land to a smaller but more economically viable number of farmers.

AB - This article examines the characteristics of and choice among two production technologies in Ethiopian agriculture, one with fertilizer and the other without, using 1989-90 farm-level data. For northwest and central Ethiopia, fertilizer usage determinants are estimated simultaneously with technology-specific production functions. For southern Ethiopia, where fertilizer is rarely used, a single production function is estimated. Three conclusions emerge. First, fertilizer use is not significantly affected by a farm's stocks of capital or land. This is consistent with the fact that fertilizer allocation decisions under the deposed Mengistu regime were politicized to the point where farmers had little control over use. Second, fertilizer is associated with a smaller factor share for cattle and a larger share for land, meaning that those who control land may gain relative to the individual farmers who own cattle as the country develops agriculturally. Third, farms without fertilizer in northwest and central Ethiopia tend to be too small, a problem due to population pressures on the land and communal methods of land allocation. This suggests that land allocation institutions should adjust by distributing land to a smaller but more economically viable number of farmers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028257571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028257571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0169-5150(94)90006-X

DO - 10.1016/0169-5150(94)90006-X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0028257571

VL - 10

SP - 179

EP - 191

JO - Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom)

JF - Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom)

SN - 0169-5150

IS - 2

ER -