Professionalism in medical education: The development and validation of a survey instrument to assess attitudes toward professionalism

George Blackall, Steven A. Melnick, Glenda H. Shoop, John George, Susan M. Lerner, Philip K. Wilson, Richard C. Pees, Margaret Kreher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and aim: This study examined attitudes toward professionalism in an academic medical center. The paper will describe the development and factorial validity of an instrument to measure attitudes toward professionalism in medical education among students, residents and faculty. Methods: A factor analysis of the intercorrelations of responses to 36 items reflecting the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) elements of professionalism for a sample of 765 medical students, residents and faculty was carried out. Data were collected during the spring of 2004. The study was conducted at the Penn State College of Medicine in Hershey, PA, USA. Results: Main outcome measures include internal consistency reliability estimates (Cronbach's alpha) for each element of professionalism and a principal components analysis of the intercorrelations of responses to the 36 items in the questionnaire. Analysis of responses reveals seven identifiable factors of professionalism: accountability, altruism, duty, enrichment, equity, honor and integrity, and respect. Conclusions: The Penn State College of Medicine Professionalism Questionnaire is one of the first valid and reliable surveys of attitudes among medical students, residents, and faculty that reflects seven elements of professionalism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMedical teacher
Volume29
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2007

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Professionalism in medical education: The development and validation of a survey instrument to assess attitudes toward professionalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this