Profiles of cognitive appraisals and triangulation into interparental conflict

Implications for adolescent adjustment

Gregory M. Fosco, Bethany Cara Bray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Youth appraisals and triangulation into conflicts are key mechanisms by which interparental conflict places youth at risk for psychological maladjustment. Although evidence suggests that there are multiple mechanisms at work (e.g., Fosco & Feinberg, 2015; Grych, Harold, & Miles, 2003), this body of work has relied on variable-centered analyses that are limited to the unique contributions of each process to the variance in outcomes. In reality, it is possible that different combinations of these risk mechanisms may account for multifinality in risk outcomes. Using latent profile analysis (LPA) we examined profiles of threat appraisals, self-blaming attributions, and triangulation in relation to internalizing and externalizing problems in a sample of 285, ethnically diverse high school students. The current analyses revealed 5 distinct profiles of appraisals and triangulation, including an overall low-risk group and a global high-risk group, in which all 3 processes were below average or above average, respectively. Additional profiles included combinations of threat and blame, threat and triangulation, and blame and triangulation. Links between these profiles and emotional distress, problem behavior, and academic outcomes are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)533-542
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Family Psychology
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 10 2016

Fingerprint

Social Adjustment
Family Conflict
Students
Psychology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{dcc6c09964624b6587fde59f1d52df65,
title = "Profiles of cognitive appraisals and triangulation into interparental conflict: Implications for adolescent adjustment",
abstract = "Youth appraisals and triangulation into conflicts are key mechanisms by which interparental conflict places youth at risk for psychological maladjustment. Although evidence suggests that there are multiple mechanisms at work (e.g., Fosco & Feinberg, 2015; Grych, Harold, & Miles, 2003), this body of work has relied on variable-centered analyses that are limited to the unique contributions of each process to the variance in outcomes. In reality, it is possible that different combinations of these risk mechanisms may account for multifinality in risk outcomes. Using latent profile analysis (LPA) we examined profiles of threat appraisals, self-blaming attributions, and triangulation in relation to internalizing and externalizing problems in a sample of 285, ethnically diverse high school students. The current analyses revealed 5 distinct profiles of appraisals and triangulation, including an overall low-risk group and a global high-risk group, in which all 3 processes were below average or above average, respectively. Additional profiles included combinations of threat and blame, threat and triangulation, and blame and triangulation. Links between these profiles and emotional distress, problem behavior, and academic outcomes are discussed.",
author = "Fosco, {Gregory M.} and Bray, {Bethany Cara}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1037/fam0000192",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "533--542",
journal = "Journal of Family Psychology",
issn = "0893-3200",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Profiles of cognitive appraisals and triangulation into interparental conflict : Implications for adolescent adjustment. / Fosco, Gregory M.; Bray, Bethany Cara.

In: Journal of Family Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 5, 10.03.2016, p. 533-542.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Profiles of cognitive appraisals and triangulation into interparental conflict

T2 - Implications for adolescent adjustment

AU - Fosco, Gregory M.

AU - Bray, Bethany Cara

PY - 2016/3/10

Y1 - 2016/3/10

N2 - Youth appraisals and triangulation into conflicts are key mechanisms by which interparental conflict places youth at risk for psychological maladjustment. Although evidence suggests that there are multiple mechanisms at work (e.g., Fosco & Feinberg, 2015; Grych, Harold, & Miles, 2003), this body of work has relied on variable-centered analyses that are limited to the unique contributions of each process to the variance in outcomes. In reality, it is possible that different combinations of these risk mechanisms may account for multifinality in risk outcomes. Using latent profile analysis (LPA) we examined profiles of threat appraisals, self-blaming attributions, and triangulation in relation to internalizing and externalizing problems in a sample of 285, ethnically diverse high school students. The current analyses revealed 5 distinct profiles of appraisals and triangulation, including an overall low-risk group and a global high-risk group, in which all 3 processes were below average or above average, respectively. Additional profiles included combinations of threat and blame, threat and triangulation, and blame and triangulation. Links between these profiles and emotional distress, problem behavior, and academic outcomes are discussed.

AB - Youth appraisals and triangulation into conflicts are key mechanisms by which interparental conflict places youth at risk for psychological maladjustment. Although evidence suggests that there are multiple mechanisms at work (e.g., Fosco & Feinberg, 2015; Grych, Harold, & Miles, 2003), this body of work has relied on variable-centered analyses that are limited to the unique contributions of each process to the variance in outcomes. In reality, it is possible that different combinations of these risk mechanisms may account for multifinality in risk outcomes. Using latent profile analysis (LPA) we examined profiles of threat appraisals, self-blaming attributions, and triangulation in relation to internalizing and externalizing problems in a sample of 285, ethnically diverse high school students. The current analyses revealed 5 distinct profiles of appraisals and triangulation, including an overall low-risk group and a global high-risk group, in which all 3 processes were below average or above average, respectively. Additional profiles included combinations of threat and blame, threat and triangulation, and blame and triangulation. Links between these profiles and emotional distress, problem behavior, and academic outcomes are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959890415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959890415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/fam0000192

DO - 10.1037/fam0000192

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 533

EP - 542

JO - Journal of Family Psychology

JF - Journal of Family Psychology

SN - 0893-3200

IS - 5

ER -