Profiles of college students mandated to alcohol intervention

Nancy P. Barnett, Brian Borsari, John Hustad, Tracy O.Leary Tevyaw, Suzanne M. Colby, Christopher W. Kahler, Peter M. Monti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Most colleges have sanctions or required interventions for students who receive alcohol violations or medical evaluation for intoxication. The aim of this study was to establish profiles of mandated students from a combined data set using exploratory and replication cluster analysis. Method: Data sets from three samples of mandated students (total participant n = 393) were combined for exploratory analyses, and a fourth sample (n = 289) was analyzed for replication. Clustering variables were past-month heavy drinking, past-year alcohol problems, incident alcohol use, responsibility for the incident, and aversiveness of the incident. Results: A three-cluster solution was produced in the exploratory analysis and confirmed in replication and cross-replication analyses. Clusters formed included a "Why Me?" cluster characterized by a pattern of relatively low heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems, very little incident drinking, and low responsibility and aversiveness. A "So What?" cluster was characterized by high heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems, moderate incident drinking and responsibility, and low aversiveness. A "Bad Incident" cluster was characterized by low scores for heavy drinking and problems and high levels of incident drinking, responsibility, and aversiveness. External variables supported the validity of the cluster solution. Conclusions: Mandated students form clinically meaningful profiles on easily measured constructs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)684-694
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs
Volume69
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Drinking
incident
alcohol
Alcohols
Students
student
Alcohol Drinking
Cluster Analysis
responsibility
Cluster analysis
intoxication
cluster analysis
sanction
evaluation
Datasets

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Toxicology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Barnett, N. P., Borsari, B., Hustad, J., Tevyaw, T. O. L., Colby, S. M., Kahler, C. W., & Monti, P. M. (2008). Profiles of college students mandated to alcohol intervention. Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 69(5), 684-694. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2008.69.684
Barnett, Nancy P. ; Borsari, Brian ; Hustad, John ; Tevyaw, Tracy O.Leary ; Colby, Suzanne M. ; Kahler, Christopher W. ; Monti, Peter M. / Profiles of college students mandated to alcohol intervention. In: Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. 2008 ; Vol. 69, No. 5. pp. 684-694.
@article{aa365cd08f0c408a942298037fd35de7,
title = "Profiles of college students mandated to alcohol intervention",
abstract = "Objective: Most colleges have sanctions or required interventions for students who receive alcohol violations or medical evaluation for intoxication. The aim of this study was to establish profiles of mandated students from a combined data set using exploratory and replication cluster analysis. Method: Data sets from three samples of mandated students (total participant n = 393) were combined for exploratory analyses, and a fourth sample (n = 289) was analyzed for replication. Clustering variables were past-month heavy drinking, past-year alcohol problems, incident alcohol use, responsibility for the incident, and aversiveness of the incident. Results: A three-cluster solution was produced in the exploratory analysis and confirmed in replication and cross-replication analyses. Clusters formed included a {"}Why Me?{"} cluster characterized by a pattern of relatively low heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems, very little incident drinking, and low responsibility and aversiveness. A {"}So What?{"} cluster was characterized by high heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems, moderate incident drinking and responsibility, and low aversiveness. A {"}Bad Incident{"} cluster was characterized by low scores for heavy drinking and problems and high levels of incident drinking, responsibility, and aversiveness. External variables supported the validity of the cluster solution. Conclusions: Mandated students form clinically meaningful profiles on easily measured constructs.",
author = "Barnett, {Nancy P.} and Brian Borsari and John Hustad and Tevyaw, {Tracy O.Leary} and Colby, {Suzanne M.} and Kahler, {Christopher W.} and Monti, {Peter M.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.15288/jsad.2008.69.684",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "684--694",
journal = "Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs",
issn = "1937-1888",
publisher = "Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Barnett, NP, Borsari, B, Hustad, J, Tevyaw, TOL, Colby, SM, Kahler, CW & Monti, PM 2008, 'Profiles of college students mandated to alcohol intervention', Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 684-694. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2008.69.684

Profiles of college students mandated to alcohol intervention. / Barnett, Nancy P.; Borsari, Brian; Hustad, John; Tevyaw, Tracy O.Leary; Colby, Suzanne M.; Kahler, Christopher W.; Monti, Peter M.

In: Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, Vol. 69, No. 5, 01.01.2008, p. 684-694.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Profiles of college students mandated to alcohol intervention

AU - Barnett, Nancy P.

AU - Borsari, Brian

AU - Hustad, John

AU - Tevyaw, Tracy O.Leary

AU - Colby, Suzanne M.

AU - Kahler, Christopher W.

AU - Monti, Peter M.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Objective: Most colleges have sanctions or required interventions for students who receive alcohol violations or medical evaluation for intoxication. The aim of this study was to establish profiles of mandated students from a combined data set using exploratory and replication cluster analysis. Method: Data sets from three samples of mandated students (total participant n = 393) were combined for exploratory analyses, and a fourth sample (n = 289) was analyzed for replication. Clustering variables were past-month heavy drinking, past-year alcohol problems, incident alcohol use, responsibility for the incident, and aversiveness of the incident. Results: A three-cluster solution was produced in the exploratory analysis and confirmed in replication and cross-replication analyses. Clusters formed included a "Why Me?" cluster characterized by a pattern of relatively low heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems, very little incident drinking, and low responsibility and aversiveness. A "So What?" cluster was characterized by high heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems, moderate incident drinking and responsibility, and low aversiveness. A "Bad Incident" cluster was characterized by low scores for heavy drinking and problems and high levels of incident drinking, responsibility, and aversiveness. External variables supported the validity of the cluster solution. Conclusions: Mandated students form clinically meaningful profiles on easily measured constructs.

AB - Objective: Most colleges have sanctions or required interventions for students who receive alcohol violations or medical evaluation for intoxication. The aim of this study was to establish profiles of mandated students from a combined data set using exploratory and replication cluster analysis. Method: Data sets from three samples of mandated students (total participant n = 393) were combined for exploratory analyses, and a fourth sample (n = 289) was analyzed for replication. Clustering variables were past-month heavy drinking, past-year alcohol problems, incident alcohol use, responsibility for the incident, and aversiveness of the incident. Results: A three-cluster solution was produced in the exploratory analysis and confirmed in replication and cross-replication analyses. Clusters formed included a "Why Me?" cluster characterized by a pattern of relatively low heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems, very little incident drinking, and low responsibility and aversiveness. A "So What?" cluster was characterized by high heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems, moderate incident drinking and responsibility, and low aversiveness. A "Bad Incident" cluster was characterized by low scores for heavy drinking and problems and high levels of incident drinking, responsibility, and aversiveness. External variables supported the validity of the cluster solution. Conclusions: Mandated students form clinically meaningful profiles on easily measured constructs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54049131261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54049131261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.15288/jsad.2008.69.684

DO - 10.15288/jsad.2008.69.684

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 684

EP - 694

JO - Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

JF - Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

SN - 1937-1888

IS - 5

ER -