Promoting Fairness in Sport through Performance-enhancing Substances: An Argument for Why Sport Referees Ought to ‘Be on Drugs’

Thomas Søbirk Petersen, Francisco Javier Lopez Frias

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The debate on the use of performance-enhancing substances or methods to improve refereeing is underdeveloped in the sport philosophical literature. This contrast with the attention scholars have devoted to the use of such substances and methods for athletic purposes. However, when considered from the perspective of fairness, this differential treatment is problematic. Since one of the main concerns with performance-enhancing drugs is their detrimental effect on fairness, the use of performance-enhancing drugs and methods to improve refereeing, given their positive effects on fairness, should have more relevance in the literature. If anti-doping advocates aim to protect and promote fairness in sport, they should consider the possibility of using performance-enhancing drugs or methods to improve refereeing. In this article, we make an argument for this possibility and critically discuss some possible objections. We conclude that referees, under certain conditions, ought to use doping substances or methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSport, Ethics and Philosophy
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Philosophy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Promoting Fairness in Sport through Performance-enhancing Substances: An Argument for Why Sport Referees Ought to ‘Be on Drugs’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this