TY - JOUR
T1 - Promotive and Prohibitive Ethical Voice
T2 - Coworker Emotions and Support for the Voice
AU - Chen, Anjier
AU - Trevi˜no, Linda K.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by a grant from the Smeal College of Business and a grant from the National University of Singapore BusinessSchool. We thank Stephen Humphrey, Carolyn Dang, Aparna Joshi, KarenWinterich, and Kai Chi Yam for their valuable comments on earlier versionsof the manuscript. Study 1 of this article was part of the first author’s doctoraldissertation
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Psychological Association
PY - 2022/1/6
Y1 - 2022/1/6
N2 - Despite the importance of ethical voice for advancing ethics in organizations, we know little about how coworkers respond to ethical voice in their work units. Drawing on the fundamental approach/avoidance behavioral system and the promotive and prohibitive distinction in the voice literature, we distinguish between promotive and prohibitive ethical voice and propose that they engender different emotions— elevation (an approach-oriented moral emotion) and feelings of threat (an avoidance-oriented emotion), respectively, in coworkers. We propose that these emotions differentially influence coworker subsequent responses to the ethical voice behavior. In a time-lagged critical incident survey and two experimental studies, we consistently found support for our hypothesis that promotive ethical voice elicits moral elevation in coworkers with subsequent coworker verbal support for the ethical voice (an approach-oriented response). However, results for prohibitive ethical voice were more complex because prohibitive ethical voice leads to mixed emotions in coworkers. It sometimes leads to feelings of threat, with indirect negative effects via threat on coworker support. But surprisingly, it also leads to coworker elevation and hence can have positive indirect effects via elevation on coworker support. We will discuss the research and practical implications of these findings.
AB - Despite the importance of ethical voice for advancing ethics in organizations, we know little about how coworkers respond to ethical voice in their work units. Drawing on the fundamental approach/avoidance behavioral system and the promotive and prohibitive distinction in the voice literature, we distinguish between promotive and prohibitive ethical voice and propose that they engender different emotions— elevation (an approach-oriented moral emotion) and feelings of threat (an avoidance-oriented emotion), respectively, in coworkers. We propose that these emotions differentially influence coworker subsequent responses to the ethical voice behavior. In a time-lagged critical incident survey and two experimental studies, we consistently found support for our hypothesis that promotive ethical voice elicits moral elevation in coworkers with subsequent coworker verbal support for the ethical voice (an approach-oriented response). However, results for prohibitive ethical voice were more complex because prohibitive ethical voice leads to mixed emotions in coworkers. It sometimes leads to feelings of threat, with indirect negative effects via threat on coworker support. But surprisingly, it also leads to coworker elevation and hence can have positive indirect effects via elevation on coworker support. We will discuss the research and practical implications of these findings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123179340&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123179340&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/apl0001003
DO - 10.1037/apl0001003
M3 - Article
C2 - 34990163
AN - SCOPUS:85123179340
SN - 0021-9010
VL - 107
SP - 1973
EP - 1994
JO - Journal of Applied Psychology
JF - Journal of Applied Psychology
IS - 11
ER -