Properties of the Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics Across Sex, Level of Familiarity, and Interpersonal Conflict

Christopher J. Hopwood, Alana L. Harrison, Marlissa Amole, Jeffrey M. Girard, Aidan G.C. Wright, Katherine M. Thomas, Pamela Sadler, Emily B. Ansell, Tara M. Chaplin, Leslie C. Morey, Michael J. Crowley, C. Emily Durbin, Deborah A. Kashy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics (CAID) is a method in which trained observers continuously code the dominance and warmth of individuals who interact with one another in dyads. This method has significant promise for assessing dynamic interpersonal processes. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of individual sex, dyadic familiarity, and situational conflict on patterns of interpersonal warmth, dominance, and complementarity as assessed via CAID. We used six samples with 603 dyads, including two samples of unacquainted mixed-sex undergraduates interacting in a collaborative task, two samples of couples interacting in both collaborative and conflict tasks, and two samples of mothers and children interacting in both collaborative and conflict tasks. Complementarity effects were robust across all samples, and individuals tended to be relatively warm and dominant. Results from multilevel models indicated that women were slightly warmer than men, whereas there were no sex differences in dominance. Unfamiliar dyads and dyads interacting in more collaborative tasks were relatively warmer, more submissive, and more complementary on warmth but less complementary on dominance. These findings speak to the utility of the CAID method for assessing interpersonal dynamics and provide norms for researchers who use the method for different types of samples and applications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-56
Number of pages17
JournalAssessment
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020

Fingerprint

Sex Characteristics
Mothers
Research Personnel
Conflict (Psychology)
Recognition (Psychology)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Hopwood, C. J., Harrison, A. L., Amole, M., Girard, J. M., Wright, A. G. C., Thomas, K. M., ... Kashy, D. A. (2020). Properties of the Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics Across Sex, Level of Familiarity, and Interpersonal Conflict. Assessment, 27(1), 40-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118798916
Hopwood, Christopher J. ; Harrison, Alana L. ; Amole, Marlissa ; Girard, Jeffrey M. ; Wright, Aidan G.C. ; Thomas, Katherine M. ; Sadler, Pamela ; Ansell, Emily B. ; Chaplin, Tara M. ; Morey, Leslie C. ; Crowley, Michael J. ; Emily Durbin, C. ; Kashy, Deborah A. / Properties of the Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics Across Sex, Level of Familiarity, and Interpersonal Conflict. In: Assessment. 2020 ; Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 40-56.
@article{de95c816e5394b00b779099a635e596c,
title = "Properties of the Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics Across Sex, Level of Familiarity, and Interpersonal Conflict",
abstract = "The Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics (CAID) is a method in which trained observers continuously code the dominance and warmth of individuals who interact with one another in dyads. This method has significant promise for assessing dynamic interpersonal processes. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of individual sex, dyadic familiarity, and situational conflict on patterns of interpersonal warmth, dominance, and complementarity as assessed via CAID. We used six samples with 603 dyads, including two samples of unacquainted mixed-sex undergraduates interacting in a collaborative task, two samples of couples interacting in both collaborative and conflict tasks, and two samples of mothers and children interacting in both collaborative and conflict tasks. Complementarity effects were robust across all samples, and individuals tended to be relatively warm and dominant. Results from multilevel models indicated that women were slightly warmer than men, whereas there were no sex differences in dominance. Unfamiliar dyads and dyads interacting in more collaborative tasks were relatively warmer, more submissive, and more complementary on warmth but less complementary on dominance. These findings speak to the utility of the CAID method for assessing interpersonal dynamics and provide norms for researchers who use the method for different types of samples and applications.",
author = "Hopwood, {Christopher J.} and Harrison, {Alana L.} and Marlissa Amole and Girard, {Jeffrey M.} and Wright, {Aidan G.C.} and Thomas, {Katherine M.} and Pamela Sadler and Ansell, {Emily B.} and Chaplin, {Tara M.} and Morey, {Leslie C.} and Crowley, {Michael J.} and {Emily Durbin}, C. and Kashy, {Deborah A.}",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1073191118798916",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "40--56",
journal = "Assessment",
issn = "1073-1911",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Hopwood, CJ, Harrison, AL, Amole, M, Girard, JM, Wright, AGC, Thomas, KM, Sadler, P, Ansell, EB, Chaplin, TM, Morey, LC, Crowley, MJ, Emily Durbin, C & Kashy, DA 2020, 'Properties of the Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics Across Sex, Level of Familiarity, and Interpersonal Conflict', Assessment, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 40-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118798916

Properties of the Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics Across Sex, Level of Familiarity, and Interpersonal Conflict. / Hopwood, Christopher J.; Harrison, Alana L.; Amole, Marlissa; Girard, Jeffrey M.; Wright, Aidan G.C.; Thomas, Katherine M.; Sadler, Pamela; Ansell, Emily B.; Chaplin, Tara M.; Morey, Leslie C.; Crowley, Michael J.; Emily Durbin, C.; Kashy, Deborah A.

In: Assessment, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.01.2020, p. 40-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Properties of the Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics Across Sex, Level of Familiarity, and Interpersonal Conflict

AU - Hopwood, Christopher J.

AU - Harrison, Alana L.

AU - Amole, Marlissa

AU - Girard, Jeffrey M.

AU - Wright, Aidan G.C.

AU - Thomas, Katherine M.

AU - Sadler, Pamela

AU - Ansell, Emily B.

AU - Chaplin, Tara M.

AU - Morey, Leslie C.

AU - Crowley, Michael J.

AU - Emily Durbin, C.

AU - Kashy, Deborah A.

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - The Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics (CAID) is a method in which trained observers continuously code the dominance and warmth of individuals who interact with one another in dyads. This method has significant promise for assessing dynamic interpersonal processes. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of individual sex, dyadic familiarity, and situational conflict on patterns of interpersonal warmth, dominance, and complementarity as assessed via CAID. We used six samples with 603 dyads, including two samples of unacquainted mixed-sex undergraduates interacting in a collaborative task, two samples of couples interacting in both collaborative and conflict tasks, and two samples of mothers and children interacting in both collaborative and conflict tasks. Complementarity effects were robust across all samples, and individuals tended to be relatively warm and dominant. Results from multilevel models indicated that women were slightly warmer than men, whereas there were no sex differences in dominance. Unfamiliar dyads and dyads interacting in more collaborative tasks were relatively warmer, more submissive, and more complementary on warmth but less complementary on dominance. These findings speak to the utility of the CAID method for assessing interpersonal dynamics and provide norms for researchers who use the method for different types of samples and applications.

AB - The Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics (CAID) is a method in which trained observers continuously code the dominance and warmth of individuals who interact with one another in dyads. This method has significant promise for assessing dynamic interpersonal processes. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of individual sex, dyadic familiarity, and situational conflict on patterns of interpersonal warmth, dominance, and complementarity as assessed via CAID. We used six samples with 603 dyads, including two samples of unacquainted mixed-sex undergraduates interacting in a collaborative task, two samples of couples interacting in both collaborative and conflict tasks, and two samples of mothers and children interacting in both collaborative and conflict tasks. Complementarity effects were robust across all samples, and individuals tended to be relatively warm and dominant. Results from multilevel models indicated that women were slightly warmer than men, whereas there were no sex differences in dominance. Unfamiliar dyads and dyads interacting in more collaborative tasks were relatively warmer, more submissive, and more complementary on warmth but less complementary on dominance. These findings speak to the utility of the CAID method for assessing interpersonal dynamics and provide norms for researchers who use the method for different types of samples and applications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059344364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059344364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1073191118798916

DO - 10.1177/1073191118798916

M3 - Article

C2 - 30221975

AN - SCOPUS:85059344364

VL - 27

SP - 40

EP - 56

JO - Assessment

JF - Assessment

SN - 1073-1911

IS - 1

ER -