Prosody and the meanings of English negative indefinites

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates the acoustic correlates of single and Double Negation (DN) readings of English negative indefinites in question–answer pairs. Productions of four negative words (no one, nobody, nothing, and nowhere) were elicited from 20 native English speakers as responses to negative questions such as “What didn't you eat?” in contexts designed to generate either a single negation reading or a logically affirmative DN reading. A control condition with no negation in the question was employed for comparison. A verification question following each item determined whether tokens were interpreted as expected and, therefore, produced with the target interpretation. Statistical analysis of the f0 curves revealed a significant difference: DN is associated with a higher fundamental frequency than single negation. In contrast, the single negative and control conditions were not significantly different with respect to f0. Analysis of the verification question responses showed significant differences between all three conditions (Control > DN > single negation), suggesting that single negation is more difficult to interpret than DN as a response to a negative question. The results are compared with previous work on Romance, and we demonstrate how English behaves like a prototypical Negative Concord language in that DN is the prosodically marked form.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-139
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Pragmatics
Volume129
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

acoustics
statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Acoustics
interpretation
language
Prosody
Double Negation
Negation
Negative Questions
English Speakers
Eat
Negative Concord
Statistical Analysis
Romance
Language
Fundamental Frequency

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

@article{6a10e9280a664caba037c07034224f34,
title = "Prosody and the meanings of English negative indefinites",
abstract = "This paper investigates the acoustic correlates of single and Double Negation (DN) readings of English negative indefinites in question–answer pairs. Productions of four negative words (no one, nobody, nothing, and nowhere) were elicited from 20 native English speakers as responses to negative questions such as “What didn't you eat?” in contexts designed to generate either a single negation reading or a logically affirmative DN reading. A control condition with no negation in the question was employed for comparison. A verification question following each item determined whether tokens were interpreted as expected and, therefore, produced with the target interpretation. Statistical analysis of the f0 curves revealed a significant difference: DN is associated with a higher fundamental frequency than single negation. In contrast, the single negative and control conditions were not significantly different with respect to f0. Analysis of the verification question responses showed significant differences between all three conditions (Control > DN > single negation), suggesting that single negation is more difficult to interpret than DN as a response to a negative question. The results are compared with previous work on Romance, and we demonstrate how English behaves like a prototypical Negative Concord language in that DN is the prosodically marked form.",
author = "Blanchette, {Frances Kathleen} and Marianna Nadeu",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "129",
pages = "123--139",
journal = "Journal of Pragmatics",
issn = "0378-2166",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Prosody and the meanings of English negative indefinites. / Blanchette, Frances Kathleen; Nadeu, Marianna.

In: Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 129, 01.05.2018, p. 123-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prosody and the meanings of English negative indefinites

AU - Blanchette, Frances Kathleen

AU - Nadeu, Marianna

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - This paper investigates the acoustic correlates of single and Double Negation (DN) readings of English negative indefinites in question–answer pairs. Productions of four negative words (no one, nobody, nothing, and nowhere) were elicited from 20 native English speakers as responses to negative questions such as “What didn't you eat?” in contexts designed to generate either a single negation reading or a logically affirmative DN reading. A control condition with no negation in the question was employed for comparison. A verification question following each item determined whether tokens were interpreted as expected and, therefore, produced with the target interpretation. Statistical analysis of the f0 curves revealed a significant difference: DN is associated with a higher fundamental frequency than single negation. In contrast, the single negative and control conditions were not significantly different with respect to f0. Analysis of the verification question responses showed significant differences between all three conditions (Control > DN > single negation), suggesting that single negation is more difficult to interpret than DN as a response to a negative question. The results are compared with previous work on Romance, and we demonstrate how English behaves like a prototypical Negative Concord language in that DN is the prosodically marked form.

AB - This paper investigates the acoustic correlates of single and Double Negation (DN) readings of English negative indefinites in question–answer pairs. Productions of four negative words (no one, nobody, nothing, and nowhere) were elicited from 20 native English speakers as responses to negative questions such as “What didn't you eat?” in contexts designed to generate either a single negation reading or a logically affirmative DN reading. A control condition with no negation in the question was employed for comparison. A verification question following each item determined whether tokens were interpreted as expected and, therefore, produced with the target interpretation. Statistical analysis of the f0 curves revealed a significant difference: DN is associated with a higher fundamental frequency than single negation. In contrast, the single negative and control conditions were not significantly different with respect to f0. Analysis of the verification question responses showed significant differences between all three conditions (Control > DN > single negation), suggesting that single negation is more difficult to interpret than DN as a response to a negative question. The results are compared with previous work on Romance, and we demonstrate how English behaves like a prototypical Negative Concord language in that DN is the prosodically marked form.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044608508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044608508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.020

DO - 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.020

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85044608508

VL - 129

SP - 123

EP - 139

JO - Journal of Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Pragmatics

SN - 0378-2166

ER -