Prospects for experimental approaches to research on bureaucratic red tape

Sanjay K. Pandey, Sheela Pandey, Gregg G. Van Ryzin

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction Red tape (or, more precisely, red ribbons or strings), an attractive and useful physical artifice for securing official documents in the late Middle Ages, ceased to be a symbol of order and efficiency long ago (Bozeman 2000; Brewer and Walker 2010). Instead, modern lexical usage of the term bureaucratic red tape has been unequivocally pejorative, leading Goodsell (1983: 63) to call it a ‘classic condensation symbol’ and Pandey (1995: 5–6) to highlight the term's connotative and evocative usefulness to critics of bureaucracy. Despite the pervasive and sustained use of the term red tape in everyday language, encapsulating different implicit explanations for dysfunctions of bureaucracy and its impact on a variety of stakeholders, neither policy makers nor scholars paid serious attention to bureaucratic red tape until about 25 years ago. This state of affairs began to change in the 1990s in both policy making and academic domains. The reinventing government movement, spearheaded by then Vice President Al Gore, promised results by cutting red tape (Osborne and Gaebler 1992; Thompson and Riccucci 1998). Reinventing government was of course the American version of new public management, a global good government movement targeting bureaucracy and advertising the benefits of ‘business-like’ methods to counter bureaucracy and achieve results (Hood 1991; Moynihan and Pandey 2006; Pandey et al. 2014; Pollitt and Bouckaert 2011). Contemporaneously, the dominant academic view in public management scholarship regarding bureaucratic red tape as an epiphenomenon and a second-order event began to come apart in the 1990s. Barry Bozeman's insightful and frame-breaking scholarship provided the fillip to disintegration of the dominant academic view that regarded red tape as an epiphenomenon and also laid the foundation for a new way of looking at bureaucratic red tape in public management scholarship (Bozeman 1993, 2000; Bozeman and Scott 1996). In this chapter, we begin by providing an overview of advancements in public management theory on red tape. We furnish sufficient detail in this overview to provide insight into key perspectives and findings from the recently resurgent research on red tape. This also sets the stage for our review of the nascent body of work using the experimental method to study red tape and for our recommendations for further research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationExperiments in Public Management Research
Subtitle of host publicationChallenges and Contributions
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages219-243
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)9781316676912
ISBN (Print)9781107162051
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Red tape
Bureaucracy
Public management
Government
Symbol
New public management
Politicians
Disintegration
Usefulness
Condensation
Targeting
Policy making
Stakeholders
Language
Management theory
Experimental method

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Pandey, S. K., Pandey, S., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2017). Prospects for experimental approaches to research on bureaucratic red tape. In Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges and Contributions (pp. 219-243). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316676912.011
Pandey, Sanjay K. ; Pandey, Sheela ; Van Ryzin, Gregg G. / Prospects for experimental approaches to research on bureaucratic red tape. Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges and Contributions. Cambridge University Press, 2017. pp. 219-243
@inbook{7158a79631b94bcfa9a6c23c9b829162,
title = "Prospects for experimental approaches to research on bureaucratic red tape",
abstract = "Introduction Red tape (or, more precisely, red ribbons or strings), an attractive and useful physical artifice for securing official documents in the late Middle Ages, ceased to be a symbol of order and efficiency long ago (Bozeman 2000; Brewer and Walker 2010). Instead, modern lexical usage of the term bureaucratic red tape has been unequivocally pejorative, leading Goodsell (1983: 63) to call it a ‘classic condensation symbol’ and Pandey (1995: 5–6) to highlight the term's connotative and evocative usefulness to critics of bureaucracy. Despite the pervasive and sustained use of the term red tape in everyday language, encapsulating different implicit explanations for dysfunctions of bureaucracy and its impact on a variety of stakeholders, neither policy makers nor scholars paid serious attention to bureaucratic red tape until about 25 years ago. This state of affairs began to change in the 1990s in both policy making and academic domains. The reinventing government movement, spearheaded by then Vice President Al Gore, promised results by cutting red tape (Osborne and Gaebler 1992; Thompson and Riccucci 1998). Reinventing government was of course the American version of new public management, a global good government movement targeting bureaucracy and advertising the benefits of ‘business-like’ methods to counter bureaucracy and achieve results (Hood 1991; Moynihan and Pandey 2006; Pandey et al. 2014; Pollitt and Bouckaert 2011). Contemporaneously, the dominant academic view in public management scholarship regarding bureaucratic red tape as an epiphenomenon and a second-order event began to come apart in the 1990s. Barry Bozeman's insightful and frame-breaking scholarship provided the fillip to disintegration of the dominant academic view that regarded red tape as an epiphenomenon and also laid the foundation for a new way of looking at bureaucratic red tape in public management scholarship (Bozeman 1993, 2000; Bozeman and Scott 1996). In this chapter, we begin by providing an overview of advancements in public management theory on red tape. We furnish sufficient detail in this overview to provide insight into key perspectives and findings from the recently resurgent research on red tape. This also sets the stage for our review of the nascent body of work using the experimental method to study red tape and for our recommendations for further research.",
author = "Pandey, {Sanjay K.} and Sheela Pandey and {Van Ryzin}, {Gregg G.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/9781316676912.011",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781107162051",
pages = "219--243",
booktitle = "Experiments in Public Management Research",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Pandey, SK, Pandey, S & Van Ryzin, GG 2017, Prospects for experimental approaches to research on bureaucratic red tape. in Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges and Contributions. Cambridge University Press, pp. 219-243. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316676912.011

Prospects for experimental approaches to research on bureaucratic red tape. / Pandey, Sanjay K.; Pandey, Sheela; Van Ryzin, Gregg G.

Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges and Contributions. Cambridge University Press, 2017. p. 219-243.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Prospects for experimental approaches to research on bureaucratic red tape

AU - Pandey, Sanjay K.

AU - Pandey, Sheela

AU - Van Ryzin, Gregg G.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Introduction Red tape (or, more precisely, red ribbons or strings), an attractive and useful physical artifice for securing official documents in the late Middle Ages, ceased to be a symbol of order and efficiency long ago (Bozeman 2000; Brewer and Walker 2010). Instead, modern lexical usage of the term bureaucratic red tape has been unequivocally pejorative, leading Goodsell (1983: 63) to call it a ‘classic condensation symbol’ and Pandey (1995: 5–6) to highlight the term's connotative and evocative usefulness to critics of bureaucracy. Despite the pervasive and sustained use of the term red tape in everyday language, encapsulating different implicit explanations for dysfunctions of bureaucracy and its impact on a variety of stakeholders, neither policy makers nor scholars paid serious attention to bureaucratic red tape until about 25 years ago. This state of affairs began to change in the 1990s in both policy making and academic domains. The reinventing government movement, spearheaded by then Vice President Al Gore, promised results by cutting red tape (Osborne and Gaebler 1992; Thompson and Riccucci 1998). Reinventing government was of course the American version of new public management, a global good government movement targeting bureaucracy and advertising the benefits of ‘business-like’ methods to counter bureaucracy and achieve results (Hood 1991; Moynihan and Pandey 2006; Pandey et al. 2014; Pollitt and Bouckaert 2011). Contemporaneously, the dominant academic view in public management scholarship regarding bureaucratic red tape as an epiphenomenon and a second-order event began to come apart in the 1990s. Barry Bozeman's insightful and frame-breaking scholarship provided the fillip to disintegration of the dominant academic view that regarded red tape as an epiphenomenon and also laid the foundation for a new way of looking at bureaucratic red tape in public management scholarship (Bozeman 1993, 2000; Bozeman and Scott 1996). In this chapter, we begin by providing an overview of advancements in public management theory on red tape. We furnish sufficient detail in this overview to provide insight into key perspectives and findings from the recently resurgent research on red tape. This also sets the stage for our review of the nascent body of work using the experimental method to study red tape and for our recommendations for further research.

AB - Introduction Red tape (or, more precisely, red ribbons or strings), an attractive and useful physical artifice for securing official documents in the late Middle Ages, ceased to be a symbol of order and efficiency long ago (Bozeman 2000; Brewer and Walker 2010). Instead, modern lexical usage of the term bureaucratic red tape has been unequivocally pejorative, leading Goodsell (1983: 63) to call it a ‘classic condensation symbol’ and Pandey (1995: 5–6) to highlight the term's connotative and evocative usefulness to critics of bureaucracy. Despite the pervasive and sustained use of the term red tape in everyday language, encapsulating different implicit explanations for dysfunctions of bureaucracy and its impact on a variety of stakeholders, neither policy makers nor scholars paid serious attention to bureaucratic red tape until about 25 years ago. This state of affairs began to change in the 1990s in both policy making and academic domains. The reinventing government movement, spearheaded by then Vice President Al Gore, promised results by cutting red tape (Osborne and Gaebler 1992; Thompson and Riccucci 1998). Reinventing government was of course the American version of new public management, a global good government movement targeting bureaucracy and advertising the benefits of ‘business-like’ methods to counter bureaucracy and achieve results (Hood 1991; Moynihan and Pandey 2006; Pandey et al. 2014; Pollitt and Bouckaert 2011). Contemporaneously, the dominant academic view in public management scholarship regarding bureaucratic red tape as an epiphenomenon and a second-order event began to come apart in the 1990s. Barry Bozeman's insightful and frame-breaking scholarship provided the fillip to disintegration of the dominant academic view that regarded red tape as an epiphenomenon and also laid the foundation for a new way of looking at bureaucratic red tape in public management scholarship (Bozeman 1993, 2000; Bozeman and Scott 1996). In this chapter, we begin by providing an overview of advancements in public management theory on red tape. We furnish sufficient detail in this overview to provide insight into key perspectives and findings from the recently resurgent research on red tape. This also sets the stage for our review of the nascent body of work using the experimental method to study red tape and for our recommendations for further research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048167604&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048167604&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/9781316676912.011

DO - 10.1017/9781316676912.011

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781107162051

SP - 219

EP - 243

BT - Experiments in Public Management Research

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Pandey SK, Pandey S, Van Ryzin GG. Prospects for experimental approaches to research on bureaucratic red tape. In Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges and Contributions. Cambridge University Press. 2017. p. 219-243 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316676912.011